Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Baptized in JESUS name only???

Mabalot

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
10
ACTS 2:38
Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
ACTS 19:5
On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
ACTS 10:48So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.


I have two questions if I may please? First, I have a friend who is telling me that according to the scriptures (listed above) that you need to be baptized IN THE NAME OF JESUS (only), and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, it is wrong, because simply saying "the Son" is not being baptized in Jesus NAME.

-----------------------------------
Acts 8:14-17
When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to Samaria. <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27192">15</sup> When they arrived, they prayed for the new believers there that they might receive the Holy Spirit, <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27193">16</sup> because the Holy Spirit had not yet come on any of them; they had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27194">17</sup> Then Peter and John placed their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.


I have always been told that once a person believes on Jesus Christ as their savior, and has accepted him into their hearts, at that time is when the Holy Spirit comes into your heart. This same friend is telling me that according to the above scripture, the Holy Spirit is received AFTER you are Baptized in the NAME of JESUS.

Can someone please shed some thoughts on these two factors?
Thank you all, I look forward to your replies.
 
There is only One God. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One. I don't see the Big deal if you use all three or just the one name of Jesus Christ.

I have noted John the Baptist didn't Baptise in anyone's name. Jesus hadn't been revealed at the time, yet he did officially baptise people, even Jesus Christ himself.

AC 11:15 "As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit came on them as he had come on us at the beginning. 16 Then I remembered what the Lord had said: `John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.' 17 So if God gave them the same gift as he gave us, who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could oppose God?"


{John the Baptist is speaking here:-}
MT 3:11 "I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire."

MT 3:13 Then Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John. 14 But John tried to deter him, saying, "I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?"

MT 3:15 Jesus replied, "Let it be so now; it is proper for us to do this to fulfill all righteousness." Then John consented.

MT 3:16 As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him. 17 And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Second Question:-

In this scripture we see Believers getting the Holy Spirit without being baptised in water & in the name of Jesus.

AC 10:44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. 45 The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles. 46 For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God.
Then Peter said, 47 "Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have." 48 So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.
What we can know is that everyone who has repented and received Christ as their Lord and Saviour will GET the Holy Spirit as a guarantee of their Eternal Life.

2CO 1:20 For no matter how many promises God has made, they are "Yes" in Christ. And so through him the "Amen" is spoken by us to the glory of God. 21 Now it is God who makes both us and you stand firm in Christ. He anointed us, 22 set his seal of ownership on us, and put his Spirit in our hearts as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.


1CO 3:16 Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit lives in you? 17 If anyone destroys God's temple, God will destroy him; for God's temple is sacred, and you are that temple.
God promises to give us the Holy Spirit as He is our guarantee of what we are to receive (eternal life) and it is God's seal of ownership.

As we saw in Acts 10:44 people can receive the Holy Spirit without water baptism in the name of Jesus.

Your friend is wrong. The main reason they are wrong is because what John the Baptist had said back in Matthew 3:11

MT 3:11 "I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.
See water baptism is only a baptism of repentance. It doesn't bring on the Holy Spirit. Even Unbelievers can be Baptised in Water and in the Name of Jesus only. God knows the heart. Only Believers get the Holy Spirit and He is given to us by Jesus Christ. When Jesus left this Earth to go back to the Father only then could the Holy Spirit come down to be given to God's children.

AC 8:14 When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them. 15 When they arrived, they prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit, 16 because the Holy Spirit had not yet come upon any of them; they had simply been baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus. 17 Then Peter and John placed their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.

AC 8:18 When Simon saw that the Spirit was given at the laying on of the apostles' hands
, he offered them money 19 and said, "Give me also this ability so that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit."
You will also notice the Believers here received the Holy Spirit NOT through baptism at all but the laying on of hands.

The Simon here was a sorcerer and he wanted the gift of being able to give everyone the Holy Spirit. He didn't understand about the gift of laying on of hands and annointing others with the Holy Spirit. He thought the Apostles could give him the power and he could buy it off them with money. The power comes from God alone. No man has power stored in him from God nor can he just transfer God's power to another person. God acts through people to do what He desires. So here Peter & John were being used by God to directly fill these new Believers with the Holy Spirit.

These days like you said Saved Believers get the Holy Spirit as they repent and come to Christ. You don't need to get water baptised to receive the Holy Spirit. Just to say it again 'water baptism' is simply a baptism of repentance.

EPH 1:11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, 12 in order that we, who were the first to hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory. 13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation. Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God's possession--to the praise of his glory.
Again here with the Apostle Paul:-

AC 19:1 While Apollos was at Corinth, Paul took the road through the interior and arrived at Ephesus. There he found some disciples 2 and asked them, "Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?"
They answered, "No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit."

AC 19:3 So Paul asked, "Then what baptism did you receive?"
"John's baptism," they replied.

AC 19:4 Paul said, "John's baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus." 5 On hearing this, they were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied. 7 There were about twelve men in all.

Again it was the laying on of hands by Paul when these Believers received the Holy Spirit NOT the Water Baptism in the Name of Jesus. NOTE:- They didn't receive the Holy Spirit when they first Believed because they didn't know about the promise of receiving the Holy Spirit.

Now remember there are scriptures where Saved Believers receive the Holy Spirit without the laying on of hands so please don't think that you can only get the Holy Spirit through this method only. It is one way but not the only way.
 
Last edited:
Go Melody

We can only do what we are told to do,

In Jesus name, it is not some fine print,

Jesus is God
 
God and technicalities

I don't believe that God uses technicalities such as the baptizing not counting because you didnt say the exact right words. God(which is Jesus) knows who you are baptizing to, and if it is to God I think he wont be mad at you for using the wrong words as he can see your heart and your thoughts, words are so shallow compared to that.


1 Samuel 16:7

But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.
 
Last edited:
Is It Possible?

Is it possible to recieve the Holy Spirit before Water Baptisim or of laying Hands?
 
Is it possible to recieve the Holy Spirit before Water Baptisim or of laying Hands?

Yes, according to the scriptures.

Even as Peter was saying these things, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who had heard the message.
The Jewish believers who came with Peter were amazed that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out upon the Gentiles, too. And there could be no doubt about it, for they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. Then Peter asked, "Can anyone object to their being baptized, now that they have received the Holy Spirit just as we did?" So he gave orders for them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Afterward Cornelius asked him to stay with them for several days. Acts 10:44-48
 
reply

.
ACTS 2:38
Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
ACTS 19:5
On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
ACTS 10:48So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.

I have two questions if I may please? First, I have a friend who is telling me that according to the scriptures (listed above) that you need to be baptized IN THE NAME OF JESUS (only), and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, it is wrong, because simply saying "the Son" is not being baptized in Jesus NAME.

-----------------------------------
Acts 8:14-17
When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to Samaria. <SUP id=en-NIV-27192 class=versenum>15</SUP> When they arrived, they prayed for the new believers there that they might receive the Holy Spirit, <SUP id=en-NIV-27193 class=versenum>16</SUP> because the Holy Spirit had not yet come on any of them; they had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. <SUP id=en-NIV-27194 class=versenum>17</SUP> Then Peter and John placed their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.

I have always been told that once a person believes on Jesus Christ as their savior, and has accepted him into their hearts, at that time is when the Holy Spirit comes into your heart. This same friend is telling me that according to the above scripture, the Holy Spirit is received AFTER you are Baptized in the NAME of JESUS.

Can someone please shed some thoughts on these two factors?
Thank you all, I look forward to your replies.
add on (the scripture teaches it is by the spirit that ye are in christ. he enters in and seals you in christ. if a perso says they are saved, but have not recieved spirit yet id say they are not saved at all. we do not get saved and then recieve spirit. Christ saves you if you are saved he lives with in, and if hes there it is by the spirit ye are in him. baptisum is and outward sign of an inward work. nothing to do with salvation. it is a work you do after he saves you. to identify youreself with him. and we are not saved by works, but ,works show our faith. religion teaches it is what you do, but salvation is based on what he did. you meet christ upon hearing and believing the word, he saves you. and you know him. right then and there. and at that point the spirit enters. and ye are in christ.
 
This topic is a religious argument that has been waged for some decades now. In truth there is no competition between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
If Jesus said this (and He did) then I simply have to believe it is valid or I must get out a pair of scissors and remove it from the Word:
Mat 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Mat 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
 
Baptism is important. It's only meant for those who had given their life to Christ not unbelievers. As important as your name is so also the name in which you are baptized into is. Don't get wrong, I am living witness of this; i was first baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy-Spirit but in my journeying with the Lord, the Lord came to me and began to open my eyes to see the revelation of Jesus Christ. On the long run, the Lord asked me to go and be re-baptize in the name of Jesus Christ and I did.
So, if anyone says you should be baptize in "Title Name", that is the level of revelation of such people. All I will say is that seek the Lord and ask Him to open your eye to see the revelation of Jesus Christ. Once you have that, no man can take it away from you.
You can check my blog here in Talkjesus where i explained in details.
 
I was baptised as a child, I was marked with a cross and "claimed for Christ", I was baptised in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

At age 26, I was confirmed in the Name of the Holy Spirit as a disciple of Christ, I will need to sit and recall the wording on that one! But anyways I was asked to repeat and confirm the vows that were made on my behalf as a child.

I have invited Jesus into my heart, I have faith that Jesus is my Saviour and has forgiven my sins, and am doing all that I can to be a better person so I don't fall back into my old ways.

I pray regularly (every day)

Do I really need to Baptised as an adult, surely my faith alone should be enough? How am I to trust that the person baptising me has true intentions and isnt just a jobsworth, I trust in God alone.


--Well done for reading this far! more information for those who wish to continue:



I was brought up in a very mixed Christian environment,

I was baptised in the Church of England/protestant/Anglican church at about 3 months old. In the Church of my Grandfathers family. My Grandmother was a member of the Welsh Independent Chapel (independents, or congregationalists, not sure how to describe it in English) And I went to chapel sunday school for a few years (say age 4-8 or 9)
I also for some reason visited a methodist chapel on many occasions, I can only assume it was for eccumenical services or something but am familiar with the baptising pool at the front of the Chapel anyway.

Age 9-14/15 I was a member of the Anglican Church, Altar server, bell ringer etc.

Left Church at 15 partly due to work, partly due to falling out with God when my Grandfather passed away.

I was gone for 10 long years

Came back to God, studied hard, was confirmed in the Anglican Church, am a changed person, I am still studying, and volunteering with sunday schools to make sure that the next generation hear the Word.

Who here thinks I need to be baptised?
 
Last edited:
I have two questions if I may please? First, I have a friend who is telling me that according to the scriptures (listed above) that you need to be baptized IN THE NAME OF JESUS (only), and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, it is wrong, because simply saying "the Son" is not being baptized in Jesus NAME.


and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,

You could say in the name of Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. Three in One, One in three.
 
I have two questions if I may please? First, I have a friend who is telling me that according to the scriptures (listed above) that you need to be baptized IN THE NAME OF JESUS (only), and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, it is wrong, because simply saying "the Son" is not being baptized in Jesus NAME.


and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,

You could say in the name of Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. Three in One, One in three.

Words can't save anyone. God is the savior of all his people because he created them. It's the corrupt flesh that dies in this age but none of his creation dies.
 
I think its important to go back to one of the simplest rules with the bible,scripture cannot contradict itself.

Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

Seems thats very cut and dry,we know Peter just didnt up and decide to change what the Lord commanded,so there must more to what Peter said.

This question plagued me a few years ago,but here is an excerpt from CARM I came across that summed it up for me.

Let's take a look at what is going on in the verses. The phrase, "in the name of the Lord" is not a reference to a baptismal formula, but a reference to authority. It is similar to hearing someone say, "Stop in the name of the Law!". We understand that the "name of the Law" means by the authority of the Law. It is the same with baptism "in Jesus' name." To baptise in Jesus' name is to baptize in the authority of Jesus. Consider the following:

"And when they had placed them in the center, they began to inquire, "By what power, or in what name, have you done this?" 8 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, "Rulers and elders of the people, 9 if we are on trial today for a benefit done to a sick man, as to how this man has been made well, 10 let it be known to all of you, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead — by this name this man stands here before you in good health" (Acts 4:7-10).
Acts 4:17-18, "But in order that it may not spread any further among the people, let us warn them to speak no more to any man in this name. 18And when they had summoned them, they commanded them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus."
Acts 5:28, "We gave you strict orders not to continue teaching in this name, and behold, you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching, and intend to bring this man’s blood upon us."
Acts 5:40, "And they took his advice; and after calling the apostles in, they flogged them and ordered them to speak no more in the name of Jesus, and then released them."
Acts 8:12, "But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike."
Acts 9:27-28, "But Barnabas took hold of him and brought him to the apostles and described to them how he had seen the Lord on the road, and that He had talked to him, and how at Damascus he had spoken out boldly in the name of Jesus. 28And he was with them moving about freely in Jerusalem, speaking out boldly in the name of the Lord."
Acts 16:18, "And this did she many days. But Paul, being grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command thee in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her. And he came out the same hour."

We can see that the phrase is used in the Bible as an expression of authority. This is particularly clarified Acts 16:18 above. Let's look at it again. "And this did she many days. But Paul, being grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command thee in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her. And he came out the same hour." We also see that when people were being baptized that they did it calling on Jesus' name (Acts 22:16); that is, they were calling upon Jesus who has all authority in heaven and earth (Matt. 28:18). The church is supposed to "call upon the name of the Lord Jesus" (1 Cor. 1:2) because it is by His authority (John 1:12) that we Christians have the hope and right of forgiveness of sins and adoption as His children (Rom. 8:15).

Therefore, the Oneness Pentecostal people are simply in error by demanding that baptism be done with the formula "In Jesus name." Instead, it should be done as Jesus commanded.
 
Therefore, the Oneness Pentecostal people are simply in error by demanding that baptism be done with the formula "In Jesus name." Instead, it should be done as Jesus commanded.

Well, baptizing in the name of Jesus Christ in not a formula, neither is it a law. Rather it has to come with revelation and without that one cannot truly know the benefit of it.


I just wonder, why are 21st century Christians questioning the audacity of God's words? Why do we spend time debating and arguing on the things that are boldly written in God words? Is it not that we've left the Holy-Spirit and started to dig our head, knowledge and reasoning to God's word?
I'm very sure that something is really wrong and the problem is our REASONING.
 
Here is an excerpt from a teaching the Lord taught me and my own life experience:

It is very important not to just talk about the water baptism without touching the other aspects of it which are, IN WHAT NAME MUST WE BE BAPTIZED? IS IT BY SPRINKLE OR IMMERSION?

I believed Water Baptism is important and not just fulfillment of all righteousness. Many who seems to use this kind of phrase counted water baptism as not important. By God's grace, I will be showing to you that, in whatsoever baptism you have been baptized has an effect on your Christian walk. In fact, entering to spiritual things may be difficulty if this is not in the proper place.
Let start with; in what name must a Christian be Baptized.

IN WHAT NAME MUST A CHRISTIAN BE BAPTIZED?


Name is very important, if it were not so then, people shouldn't be given name. When God created Man in the Garden, He gave them name. When the Lord brought all the animals before Adam, they were to be given name and whatsoever name that Adam gave to them, it was that they bared even till today. Just imagine how it will look like if everybody in your Family doesn't have a name, there will be disorderliness.
So, name is very important when it come to the issue of water baptism. The scripture said in Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

This was the commandment the Lord gave to the disciples after His resurrection. And this word were to be understood by the revelation of Himself which He has given to them.

John 14:8-9;
Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.

Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

John 8:58
Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

There are many other scriptures that confirmed how the Lord was revealing Himself to them, Who He was and Is and Is to come.

If Jesus Christ has really saved you and I, wouldn't it be proper for us to be baptized in that same name in which we were saved? or Should we just follow the Logos and despise the place of Rhema? The Logos said, we should be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy-Spirit. But what does the Rhema says?

The first step in recognizing what the Rhema said is by asking What is the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy-ghost? These three things mention here are just like a title.

Let me give an analogy:

Imagine yourselves as a married man; to your wife, you are a Husband, to your Children, you are a Father, to your own parent, you a Son but to your friends and colleagues, you are John. Which one of these really described you- I mean your name?
Is it Husband, Father, Son or John? If your wife were to bear your name as a surname will she be called Mrs " Husband" or will your Children be called "James/Jane Father?"

If your answer is no and you believed that the surname in which your children and wife must bear is John, why then should we be baptized in that Title name? Why not in the name of Jesus?

One of the things Baptism does for you is to change your surname- If you have been bearing Janet Marcus, bear in mind that your original surname as an unbeliever or sinner was SATAN but when you came to Christ, you were reborn and at baptism you received a surname of the family that you now belong to and that family is the Family of Christ. Why then did you chose to be surnamed after the title called "Father, Son and Holy-Ghost?" Whynot Janet Marcus Jesus Christ? But some of you are bearing title surname. How contradictory does it sound to the teaching of Christ and His disciples.

Can we look at the application of that Matthew 28:19?;
Note that the verse read NAME not NAMES which implies that the Father, the Son and Holy-Ghost is the same person bearing the same name which is JESUS CHRIST.
Act 2:38
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost

Act 10:48;
And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

What is the name of the Lord? is it the Father, Son and Holy-Ghost or Jesus Christ?

Act 19:5;
When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

This was what the Apostle did and the Lord did not rebuked them for doing such rather He confirmed it.

So, if the truth has to be preached then it will be that those who are baptizing people in TITLE name has not yet received the revelation of what baptism is all about.
A christian must be baptized in the name of JESUS CHRIST and that is the truth.

IS IT BY SPRINKLE OR IMMERSION?

I believed the true baptism should be done by immersion, the scripture has no teaching on baptism by sprinkle. Such things are the traditions of men. John was baptizing people by river side when Jesus came to him. He didn't sprinkle water on Him rather he immersed Him inside the flowing river, Jordan.

Matt 3:16
And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him


Mark 1:9-10
And it came to pass in those days, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in Jordan.


And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him



John 3:26
And they came unto John, and said unto him, Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him.

John 4:1-2

When therefore the Lord knew how the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John,

(Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,)


You can search the scriptures and see for yourself but as far as your Christian walk is concerning, I will advice you that, if you have been baptized by sprinkling of water then you need to be re-baptize again. Also, if your own is that you have been baptized in title name, the truth of the matter is that, the Lord want you to be re-baptized in His name-Jesus Christ.

Let me show you others baptism that are in the scripture:

Baptism into Moses:

1 Cor 10:2;

And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;

Baptism into John the Baptist:

Acts 19:3;

And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

Can wrong baptism affect your Spiritual experiences in the things of God? The answer is Yes;

For example:

Acts 19:2-6
1 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.
3 And he said unto them, Unto "what" then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.

4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.

5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.

6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.

Shouldn't Paul just lay hand on them and allow them to receive the Holy Spirit without baptizing them in the name of Jesus? Why did He first baptized them before laying hand on them? In fact, why did he first asked them "Unto "what" then were ye baptized?"

The second example I will give has to do with my Spiritual experiences:

I was first baptized in the Name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy-Spirit this happened after I refused to be Baptized by Sprinkle of water. But when the Lord started to show me that there is need for me to be re-baptized again, linking it up with some experience the Lord desired me to enter into and the Door way the Lord showed to me was to be Baptized in His name.
After much teaching and conviction from the Lord, I agreed to be re-baptized again in His name (Jesus Christ) and ever since then, some of the experience I have been desiring for came without struggle. In fact, that baptism opened my eyes to many thing and till today I'm still grateful for that opportunity the Lord gave to me
.

If your baptismal experience is wrong, it is time to re-visit and make a proper correction in the light of what has been shared.

My prayer is that the Lord will grant you understanding of this in Jesus name. May the eyes of your understanding be open to see the Revelation of this word and no longer the letter. For the letter killeth but it is the Spirit that giveth Life.
 
ACTS 2:38
Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
ACTS 19:5
On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
ACTS 10:48So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.


I have two questions if I may please? First, I have a friend who is telling me that according to the scriptures (listed above) that you need to be baptized IN THE NAME OF JESUS (only), and if you are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, it is wrong, because simply saying "the Son" is not being baptized in Jesus NAME.

-----------------------------------
Acts 8:14-17
When the apostles in Jerusalem heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they sent Peter and John to Samaria. <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27192">15</sup> When they arrived, they prayed for the new believers there that they might receive the Holy Spirit, <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27193">16</sup> because the Holy Spirit had not yet come on any of them; they had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. <sup class="versenum" id="en-NIV-27194">17</sup> Then Peter and John placed their hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.


I have always been told that once a person believes on Jesus Christ as their savior, and has accepted him into their hearts, at that time is when the Holy Spirit comes into your heart. This same friend is telling me that according to the above scripture, the Holy Spirit is received AFTER you are Baptized in the NAME of JESUS.

Can someone please shed some thoughts on these two factors?
Thank you all, I look forward to your replies.

Answer to question 1:

Mt 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:


Answer to question 2:


Firstly, there is no scripture that supports the assertion that
"once a person believes on Jesus Christ as their savior, and has accepted him into their hearts, at that time is when the Holy Spirit comes into your heart."

When I received the Holy Spirit I neither "accepted Jesus Christ as my saviour" and nor did I "accept Jesus into my heart". A man placed hands on me and prayed and I sought for the Holy Spirit and when I received I spoke in tongues. Simple as that ! Anyone who has received the Holy Spirit can speak in tongues. It is a sign to unbelievers that God is present in that person's life.
 
Last edited:
Peace be unto you,

When you look up the word 'name' in the Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, you should find that what GetSaved!! said is, at least, interesting. I also totally agree with the statement that scripture cannot contradict. If there is even one verse in the Bible that seems to contradict something that you believe, you are reading something the wrong way. Get a Strong's Concordance, use some of the older translations of the Bible ( many of them can be downloaded or viewed on the net) and listen to what others believe about the same verses to see if you can find something that makes sense to you.

Let's look at a set of verses ( KJV ):


Acts 19:11 And God wrought special miracles by the hands of Paul:

Acts 19:12 So that from his body were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of them.

Acts 19:13 Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth.

Acts 19:14 And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so.

Acts 19:15 And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?

Acts 19:16 And the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, and overcame them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded.

Acts 19:17 And this was known to all the Jews and Greeks also dwelling at Ephesus; and fear fell on them all, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified.

Acts 19:18 And many that believed came, and confessed, and shewed their deeds.

What happened to the exorcists, and why? They used Jesus' name just like Paul did, but it is apparent that they lacked something. They even seemed to be exercising faith. One could argue that they had not been saved, and that could help to explain things, but do all believers experience the same power that Paul seemed to have had? No, right? Why? Can all believers not call on the name of Jesus? Don't all believers have faith? Paul obviously had been given the authority to do the things that he did. So, yes, I suppose that I am saying that he who baptizes must first have the authority to do so. And there is only one place to get that authority.

If you find yourself disagreeing with what I am saying, ask yourself this question: Would you ask someone that you know to be an unbeliever to baptize you?

lioncub: When I received the Holy Spirit I neither "accepted Jesus Christ as my saviour" and nor did I "accept Jesus into my heart". A man placed hands on me and prayed and I sought for the Holy Spirit and when I received I spoke in tongues. Simple as that ! Anyone who has received the Holy Spirit can speak in tongues. It is a sign to unbelievers that God is present in that person's life.
Each one of the following questions were implied by Paul to have the same answer, what was that answer?

I Corinthians 12:27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.

I Corinthians 12:28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

I Corinthians 12:29 Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles?

I Corinthians 12:30 Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?

I Corinthians 12:31 But covet earnestly the best gifts: and yet shew I unto you a more excellent way.

<table class="tborder" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr title="Post 181362" valign="top"><td class="alt1">
</td> </tr><tr><td class="thead" colspan="2">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
 
Back
Top