Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards and did HE used Bad Metaphor sometime when He referred to Some women

[PloughBoy]

Many people of this world thinks so. If so, then a kinder and more gentle "translations" and "Paraphrases" are Justified. And Gender sensitivity such be considered as well, for HE is a "GOD" of LOVE. In the past, translations had been outlawed because of Their insensitivity. For a movement has been honored through out "Christianity" of this day and age, to honor all "Religious" faiths in a act of LOVE and Peace. That is being honor . Even The Large Croup of "The Atheists " Organization has Proven That "The BIBLE' is also a Book of Violence, Beginning from "GENESIS to REVELATION" and They have justified it by The Content within its pages.

Examples of Jesus words:

1. Jesus referring to The Canaanite Women: (Matthew 15:26)BSB
"The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said. But Jesus replied,“It is not right to take the children’s bread and TOSS IT TO THE DOGS.”
2.
Matthew 7:6
Do not give dogs what is holy; do not throw your pearls before swine [HE is referring to People}

3.
New International Version (John 6:70]
Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” [ he called a person a devil] This is not the words of love, they have said!

Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards and did HE used Bad Metaphor sometime when He referred to Some women

4.
New American Standard Bible(Matthew 16)
But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! [They say how could He refer to PETER as SATAN! these are not the words of LOVE!]

5. How can a loving GOD call people these words and condemn them to HELL! They proclaim!
“You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell? Callin people such names,
For This Jesus is not kind and god is a fake and hateful GOD, And these christians don't read their Bibles for if they did they would know this!

And they proclaim this god of theirs in the Old testament was not kind to women and babies, and they say we got their scriptures to backed them up!
( For China already are burning Bibles and other books now! And "Communism" is The wealth today. For The christian nations are in so much debt to them that the christian nations have become their slaves! [If The Bible is True"]

American Standard Version
The rich ruleth over the poor; And the borrower is servant to the lender.
Berean Study Bible
The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is SLAVE TO the lender. ... [ but who believes the words of the bible really anymore]


So claim The "ATHEIST" Organizations and they have Big Time Lawyers to back them up and the Words of the whole Bible to prove they speak the truth!

And this movement is strong through out the world! And christianity is growing smaller and smaller by the day in REALTY! And the question must be answered. Who are The People Who grew this generation into what it is today"?


According to a report by the Institute of International Finance in January 2021, China's outstanding debt claims on the rest of the world increased from about US$1.6 trillion in 2006 to more than US$5.6 trillion as of mid-2020, making China one of the biggest creditors to low-income countries.Jun 5, 2021

China, which owns an estimated $1.1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries, is the number-two investor among foreign governments. China buys Treasuries to help depress the value of its currency, the yuan; a cheaper yuan makes the country's exports less expensive for foreign buyers.

Wisdom is known by Her Children [And I can on and on that many, some are pagans some are not finds, very interesting, and their eyes lights up}



And Jesus said: Telling HIS "Disciples"
King James Bible
"Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen."

"Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards and did HE used Bad Metaphor sometime when He referred to Some women"

That is a Question and Discussion concerning The Truth.

 

[Bob Carabbio]

Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards?

OF COURSE he did!! By today's "standards" du jour, THE BIBLE is "hate speech"

 

[PloughBoy]

OF COURSE he did!! By today's "standards" du jour, THE BIBLE is "hate speech"

You right BOB, You better change the words in GOD word. and make it fit for modern day society! You better, do what they tell you! and before it all over, people are going to have take The SHOT. And we are going to do what they tells us to do too!! We have been groom already.

This didn't start yesterday! They are going to band certain translations and copyrights dates! For they have started that already! Just like King James and the Pope told the translators what to print and how to print it> "AUTHORIZE by King James" you better doit the way HE said it! Off with your head!

The "ADVERSARY " he ain't no joke! cut Pauls head off, Crucified Peter upside down, Stone Stephen, Pulled ANDREW apart with 2 wild Horses. Sawed James into 2 pieces dip John in hot oil, Tied "William Tyndale" to the Stake choke him to death and reviled him then set him on Fire, for translating the Bible into the English Language. It is getting so bad, it is effecting me like what Peter did to "Barnabas"

 

[PloughBoy]

These will be christians who will do this:
New American Standard Bible
And at that time many will fall away, and they will betray one another and hate one another.

For many have been offended by the words of Jesus and how he have spoke.

New American Standard Bible
And blessed is any person who does not take offense at Me.”
Matthew 13:57
And they took offense at Him. But Jesus said to them, "Only in his hometown and in his own household is a prophet [has no honor] without honor."
Mark 6:4
Then Jesus said to them, "Only in his hometown, among his relatives, and in his own household is a prophet [ has no honor] without honor."

Jesus does not lie! Ain't no use in you crying, They did it to HIM, what do you think they going to do to you in your "OWN" house! LOL in Your good christian home. Now i am not talking about those who do not fit this "Scenario" or their christian homes are peaceful and quiet and they Love the Lord.

I am taking about how Jesus said HIS relatives, and the town HE live in and the house he stayed in. "he didn't have No Honor there" .... He didn't, Talk Right!

What did the people say about him in his own town?

The Rejection at Nazareth
"When the Sabbath came, He began to teach in the synagogue, and many who heard Him were astonished. “Where did this man get these ideas?” they asked. “What is this wisdom He has been given? And how can He perform such miracles? ...Isn’t this the carpenter, the son of Mary and the brother of James, Joses, Judas,and Simon? Aren’t His sisters here with us as well?” And they took offense at Him"


Nazareth is what we would call a "Ghetto City" today. I wish I could put this in "Modern Day " [Common] "Ghetto Vernacular" and how they say it! (Mark 6:3,4)

Example: "Who he think he is, coming in here teaching us, Is this not the carpenter...etc

Y'all ain't right, LOL I can tell you, what they said about Jesus and his mama! and they knew, they knew the whole family! generations. Those Hebrews was something else! it is written in the Book and Jewish history, And how GOD talked to them! LOL! You see, to many have become so holy in their own right, in this day and age! And A promoter of "Emily Post' and "Maybelline Cosmetics" Rather Than hear The Truth about mankind and how GOD view them, by using "Strong Language". in The culture they live in.



People where offend of the words he spoke and how He spoke those words!
This is why he replied to them in this way, at a certain time.
(John 12)BSB
"There is a judge for the one who rejects Me and does not receive My words: The word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day. ...I have not spoken on My own, but the Father who sent Me has commanded Me what to say AND HOW TO SAY IT."

 

[Garee]

4.
New American Standard Bible(Matthew 16)
But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! [They say how could He refer to PETER as SATAN! these are not the words of LOVE!]

Simply without parables the signified tongue of God . .Christ spoke not.

He was not referring to Peter as Satan. The unseen Lord rebuked Satan

The Son of man as the chief apostles and prophet came do do the will of the father .The father and Son as a living parable .No Son, no Father .No Father no Son .

Giving rise or meaning meaning of the antichrists the many or legion that were there then as the many today . God gave His word to His prophet Jesus Jesu empower by the Father rebuked Satan. Satan the one spirit of the antichrists' many. .

The Son of man has no power to rebuke or rise men from the dead All power is attributed to the unseen words of Father working in the Son of man, Jesus .

The same reason Blasphemy against the Son of man Jesus is forgiven. . But blasphemy against the unseen father who worked in the Son of man is not forgiven in any time period

In effect saying to Peter caught in false pride forbidding the Son of man of doing the will of the Father in respect to the evil influence of the father of lies .

Rather to walk by faith get behind the unseen father. Not Peter seen .Again Peter who folowed after the lust leading to the false pride of this world is used as one of the many antichrists (plural) deceived by the father (singular) of antichrists .

One of the problems today is many sign and wonders seekers are still looking for the antichrist (singular) or called the man of sin because Satan who has no DNA uses mankind subject to the god of this world . Again according to the example in Mathew 16


1 John 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.

Both the singular antichrist (Satan)and the plural. .antichrists as false disciples or false apostles as used with Peter must be taken together .The deceiver and those deceived.

1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

 

[PloughBoy]

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him; and without him was not anything made that hath been made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in the darkness; and the darkness apprehended it not."

New American Standard Bible
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us; and we saw His glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

"My Father who has given them to Me is greater than all. No one can snatch them out of My Father’s hand. 30I and the Father are one."

Proverbs 8:23
From everlasting I was established, from the beginning, before the earth began.

John 8:58
"Truly, truly, I tell you," Jesus declared, "before Abraham was born, I am!"

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify Me in Your presence with the glory I had with You before the world existed.
Proverbs 8:22-31
The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old…

American Standard Version(Hebrews 1:8)ASV
but of the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever; And the sceptre of uprightness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

"Your throne, O God, endures forever and ever, and justice is the scepter of Your kingdom. ..You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has anointed you above your companions with the oil of joy.…"

A "Finite Mind" cannot Comprehend The InComprehensible, of an "INFINITE GOD" For No one can explain HIM and NO one can Explain HIS Ways or HIS Existence.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways,”declares the LORD. “For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so My ways are higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts.…"

So in essence:

Acts 28:26
Go to this people and say, "You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving."

 

[Mister]

Indeed...and hasn't it always been hate speech to things of this world as they oppose each other, do they not? Jesus brought a sword!

The first time I heard Jesus say let the dead bury the dead but you go proclaim the Kingdom of God...and many of his teachings could be twisted up into a lie of "hate speech" by this world, and it's because they love not the truth, no?

Since I know God is good, I just need to understand Him more, simply learning His ways. I can clearly see that Jesus was emphasizing how great the Kingdom of God will be and to prepare for it, not this earthly kingdom.

And truly a part of me was glad to hear Jesus say it! I'm ok with what my King has to say. Please reign forevermore over me and in me Lord!

 

[only son]

the Greek word --- κυνάριον --- kunarion, ---means --- PUPPY, ---not dog

Yahashua's main ministry of healing and miracles was specifically to Hebrew people and not to Canaanites

Although Yahashua --did - heal- the woman's daughter, - he was not trying to insult the woman by literally calling her a puppy, rather, - he was using a figure of speech and implying that his work while he was living on earth was specifically designated and sent - for the Jews only, it would not be normal for him to help someone who was not a part of Israel.

But he did heal her daughter. Yahashua was taking the existing conflict that existed between Jews and Canaanites who were generational enemies - and there were a lot of hurt and bad feelings that Jews felt towards Canaanites - but Jews did allow peaceful Canaanites to live among them and probably referred to some of them as """ dogs """' because the way they - LITERALLY - lived differently morally .
NOT- BECAUSE- THEY - WERE - RACISTS

Yahashua was using a metaphor, saying that the little puppies around the table were not a part of the main meal-- but the woman was genuinely and truly wanting to believe upon him - and receive a healing for her daughter with a sincerer heart - so Yahashua healed her daughter immediately.

The story shows that Yahashua was referring to the fact that - it was rare that a Canaanite would even approach Yahashua or even believe in him or God. - He never called her a- " DOG " - but the Greek word kunarion, ---means --- A – LITTLE - PUPPY, --- not dog

furthermore this Greek word- kunarion, --- is ONLY used - { FOUR TOTAL TIMES } in the New Testament - and these are only - for the Canaanite woman, - - However, the Greek word for " DOG " is - κύων / kuōn

kuōn - and - kunarion - are not the same - in Greek, - one means a little puppy - and - the other means a dog which is - ANOTHER WORD - A - DIFFERENT- WORD - is used separately, 5 other total different times as dogs, - and a different Greek word.

The Trinitarian Translators - who translated the Bible knew exactly what the word means, - yet they take this word that is a different Greek word than the other word in the manuscripts literally describing a { DOG } and they intentionally and purposefully changed the meaning - in order to castigate the Jews in a horrible, despicable manner. AS RACISTS

This is how Trinitarians literally - re- create- their entire faith system in the Bible, - by changing, deleting, and adding words throughout the entire Bible. - to change and alter the narrative and true storyline and drift of the original message.

The purpose- of the Trinitarians changing the word into " DOGS " - was to insinuate that the Jews- were racists - and would call anyone who was not like them as a - " dog " - when this is simply not truth - -

Trinitarians need it to be truth. The fact is that the term DOG was used to refer to immorality in the Bible

Trinitarians change the narrative of how that Immoral people are called as dogs, that they turn this into a racial aspect that would depict Yahashua calling a Canaanite woman a dog because the Jews were racists.

When in fact Yahashua was being kind and respectful and even humorous to the Canaanite woman- AND INTENDED IT IN A LOVING AND HUMOROUS MANER - but Trinitarians absolutely need it to be hatefully and racist -

this comes from the Catholic Translation -which Protestants copied nearly everything every single passage, word for word, exactly - from the Catholic Bible.

 

[PloughBoy]

the Greek word --- κυνάριον --- kunarion, ---means --- PUPPY, ---not dog

Yahashua's main ministry of healing and miracles was specifically to Hebrew people and not to Canaanites

Although Yahashua --did - heal- the woman's daughter, - he was not trying to insult the woman by literally calling her a puppy, rather, - he was using a figure of speech and implying that his work while he was living on earth was specifically designated and sent - for the Jews only, it would not be normal for him to help someone who was not a part of Israel.

But he did heal her daughter. Yahashua was taking the existing conflict that existed between Jews and Canaanites who were generational enemies - and there were a lot of hurt and bad feelings that Jews felt towards Canaanites - but Jews did allow peaceful Canaanites to live among them and probably referred to some of them as """ dogs """' because the way they - LITERALLY - lived differently morally .
NOT- BECAUSE- THEY - WERE - RACISTS

Yahashua was using a metaphor, saying that the little puppies around the table were not a part of the main meal-- but the woman was genuinely and truly wanting to believe upon him - and receive a healing for her daughter with a sincerer heart - so Yahashua healed her daughter immediately.

The story shows that Yahashua was referring to the fact that - it was rare that a Canaanite would even approach Yahashua or even believe in him or God. - He never called her a- " DOG " - but the Greek word kunarion, ---means --- A – LITTLE - PUPPY, --- not dog

furthermore this Greek word- kunarion, --- is ONLY used - { FOUR TOTAL TIMES } in the New Testament - and these are only - for the Canaanite woman, - - However, the Greek word for " DOG " is - κύων / kuōn

kuōn - and - kunarion - are not the same - in Greek, - one means a little puppy - and - the other means a dog which is - ANOTHER WORD - A - DIFFERENT- WORD - is used separately, 5 other total different times as dogs, - and a different Greek word.

The Trinitarian Translators - who translated the Bible knew exactly what the word means, - yet they take this word that is a different Greek word than the other word in the manuscripts literally describing a { DOG } and they intentionally and purposefully changed the meaning - in order to castigate the Jews in a horrible, despicable manner. AS RACISTS

This is how Trinitarians literally - re- create- their entire faith system in the Bible, - by changing, deleting, and adding words throughout the entire Bible. - to change and alter the narrative and true storyline and drift of the original message.

The purpose- of the Trinitarians changing the word into " DOGS " - was to insinuate that the Jews- were racists - and would call anyone who was not like them as a - " dog " - when this is simply not truth - -

Trinitarians need it to be truth. The fact is that the term DOG was used to refer to immorality in the Bible

Trinitarians change the narrative of how that Immoral people are called as dogs, that they turn this into a racial aspect that would depict Yahashua calling a Canaanite woman a dog because the Jews were racists.

When in fact Yahashua was being kind and respectful and even humorous to the Canaanite woman- AND INTENDED IT IN A LOVING AND HUMOROUS MANER - but Trinitarians absolutely need it to be hatefully and racist -

this comes from the Catholic Translation -which Protestants copied nearly everything every single passage, word for word, exactly - from the Catholic Bible.

so I perceive that you believe the Bible is a common book with common words that have common meaning arriving from a common Koine Greek “Lexicon”.
And if possible could you gives us the date of that “Lexicon” and if possible the “Etymology” and archaic but not referring to “Transliteration”.
“dog” “puppy”.
And while you are there, look up “vipers” and “devil”. He told those religious rulers their father is the devil!

dogs.”
κυναρίοις (kynariois)
Noun - Dative Neuter Plural
Strong's 2952: A little dog, a house dog. Neuter of a presumed derivative of kuon; a puppy.

New American Bible
“Do not give what is holy to dogs, or throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them underfoot, and turn and tear you to pieces.

dogs
κυσίν (kysin)
Noun - Dative Masculine Plural
Strong's 2965: A dog, universally despised in the East. A primary word; a dog.

quick note:
A dog is a dog whether it is puppy or a Female dog
What does your “Pedigree “ papers say about one your dogs.
When he was talking about that Swine was he referring to a “piglet”?
Only for our information, since you are there.

 

[only son]

.
the first Bible lexicon was not invented until nearly 2000 years after Yahashua

and not exist until 1612, - this was, over 30 years after the " complete Bible " was translated into a modern language in - 1582

Honest Christians would not look to a Trinitarian Lexicon to explain the truth about original Greek language but only to explain the claims of the Trinitarian Translation.

 

[PloughBoy]

And who was it and what diagram this person gave us as a clear definition of The Trinty and what conclusion He came to after He “gave” the “Doctrine of The Trinty”, His conclusion!
Point Blank that Cannot be “Reputed”.

And if anyone has ever spent the time the discipline in Study The Doctrine of The Trinty should know point blank right now his conclusion without even. Thinking.

And I have study this doctrine over 40 years ago when i was nothing but a young man and it is still flesh in my mind.

My children at the age of 3 and 4 years old understood the Trinty and could explain it with clarity to the un-learn., when the pastor couldn’t. And they were not converted nor contaminated by church drama.
If you haven’t spent at least a 100 hours into The Doctrine of The Trinty, you have come up short, and need to keep your mouth shut!

That is why I do not engage with “JackLeg” “Goat Herder” scholars pertaining to The Doctrine of The Trinty, They make me, want to “Throw up”! And that is the Truth.

I have more respect for “Grandma Hattie” who claims I do not understand it but, I believe in “GOD my FATHER and in HIS Only Begotten SON and I believe in THE Holy Spirit Of GOD which “Resides in my Soul!
And I know The 3 and they are in a Agreement and and they reveals this Truth to me! And there is only “One” GOD, One SON and One Parakletos and One Baptism One LORD!

“And the world didn’t give this me, and The World can’t take it away”
And if it was good enough for Paul and Silas it’s good enough for me” I might be ignorant but I been with JESUS!
And if you are confuse you best figure it out, I am not confused and I am going to sit down until my Change come for I has a place in sky!

Complements,
From “Grandma Hattie”

 

[Garee]

the Greek word --- κυνάριον --- kunarion, ---means --- PUPPY, ---not dog

Yahashua's main ministry of healing and miracles was specifically to Hebrew people and not to Canaanites

Although Yahashua --did - heal- the woman's daughter, - he was not trying to insult the woman by literally calling her a puppy, rather, - he was using a figure of speech and implying that his work while he was living on earth was specifically designated and sent - for the Jews only, it would not be normal for him to help someone who was not a part of Israel.

But he did heal her daughter. Yahashua was taking the existing conflict that existed between Jews and Canaanites who were generational enemies - and there were a lot of hurt and bad feelings that Jews felt towards Canaanites - but Jews did allow peaceful Canaanites to live among them and probably referred to some of them as """ dogs """' because the way they - LITERALLY - lived differently morally .
NOT- BECAUSE- THEY - WERE - RACISTS

Yahashua was using a metaphor, saying that the little puppies around the table were not a part of the main meal-- but the woman was genuinely and truly wanting to believe upon him - and receive a healing for her daughter with a sincerer heart - so Yahashua healed her daughter immediately.

The story shows that Yahashua was referring to the fact that - it was rare that a Canaanite would even approach Yahashua or even believe in him or God. - He never called her a- " DOG " - but the Greek word kunarion, ---means --- A – LITTLE - PUPPY, --- not dog

furthermore this Greek word- kunarion, --- is ONLY used - { FOUR TOTAL TIMES } in the New Testament - and these are only - for the Canaanite woman, - - However, the Greek word for " DOG " is - κύων / kuōn

kuōn - and - kunarion - are not the same - in Greek, - one means a little puppy - and - the other means a dog which is - ANOTHER WORD - A - DIFFERENT- WORD - is used separately, 5 other total different times as dogs, - and a different Greek word.

The Trinitarian Translators - who translated the Bible knew exactly what the word means, - yet they take this word that is a different Greek word than the other word in the manuscripts literally describing a { DOG } and they intentionally and purposefully changed the meaning - in order to castigate the Jews in a horrible, despicable manner. AS RACISTS

This is how Trinitarians literally - re- create- their entire faith system in the Bible, - by changing, deleting, and adding words throughout the entire Bible. - to change and alter the narrative and true storyline and drift of the original message.

The purpose- of the Trinitarians changing the word into " DOGS " - was to insinuate that the Jews- were racists - and would call anyone who was not like them as a - " dog " - when this is simply not truth - -

Trinitarians need it to be truth. The fact is that the term DOG was used to refer to immorality in the Bible

Trinitarians change the narrative of how that Immoral people are called as dogs, that they turn this into a racial aspect that would depict Yahashua calling a Canaanite woman a dog because the Jews were racists.

When in fact Yahashua was being kind and respectful and even humorous to the Canaanite woman- AND INTENDED IT IN A LOVING AND HUMOROUS MANER - but Trinitarians absolutely need it to be hatefully and racist -

this comes from the Catholic Translation -which Protestants copied nearly everything every single passage, word for word, exactly - from the Catholic Bible.

It really has nothing to to with race or gender. As new creatures, sons of God we are no longer considered male or female, Jew nor Gentile
God is not a man as us . He is the one Spirit of truth .

Two represents his witness of faith " Let there be " and "it was good " The testimony of His faith or labor of His love .

A dog like a ass or other unclean animal is used as a shadow in ceremoniless it speaks of the un-redeemed . The ass signified as one with no faith as it is written. It must be redeemed with a lamb or break its neck (the spirit of judgment) .

Psalm 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.

 

[MedicBravo]

Jesus didn't use "hate speech".
Hate speech is a subjective opinion. A tactic used to try to shut up people by certain people who don't agree with them 100%.
The world and most people have a flawed idea of good speech. They turn good things into hate. Evil is seen as good and good as evil.

 

[PloughBoy]

Jesus didn't use "hate speech".
Hate speech is a subjective opinion. A tactic used to try to shut up people by certain people who don't agree with them 100%.
The world and most people have a flawed idea of good speech. They turn good things into hate. Evil is seen as good and good as evil.

I understand what you have said.

But did you really read The Title Thread, and comprehended what was being addressed?

“Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards and did HE used Bad Metaphor sometime when He referred to Some women”​

 

[MedicBravo]

I understand what you have said.

But did you really read The Title Thread, and comprehended what was being addressed?

“Did Jesus Christ use hate Speech by Today Standards and did HE used Bad Metaphor sometime when He referred to Some women”​

Yes.
Look at "today's standards" only the non-Christians and brainwashed use hate speech. There is hate speech but is an opinion like insults by one person or many on others. Hate speech is not speech someone hates b/c they don't like it.
Calling a transgender person by their biological, factual sex and gender isn't hate speech.
What is wrong about "some women"? Why would it be considered "hate speech"?
Some - could be any number of women here. It's excluding all and one women/woman.