Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Literal or Figurative?

christserf

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
111
Hello Board:

In doctrinal discussion lines of reasoning usually hinge on whether a passage is taken literally or figuratively. There should be logical, reasonable rules for determining whether or not a passage is literal or figurative. If we don't agree on how to take a passage then much of our discussion will be wasted time. Here is my proposal:

1) The main subject of a passage is more likely to be literal than figurative.
2) Something which is not the main subject of a passage should not be taken literally if doing so contradicts a literal rendition of the main subject of the same or another passage.
3) A heavenly vision is likely to be figurative, and should not be taken literal if doing so contradicts a literal rendition of the main subject of the same or another passage.
4) A command is more likely to be literal than figurative.
5) Among the possible explanations of a doctrine, we should prefer the one which takes the least passages figuratively.


Please let me know if you agree and if you don't please tell me why and offer an alternative. I am usually only able to access the Internet once or twice a week, sometimes less, so please be patient.

In Yahweh's Love,

Christ's Serf
 
Back
Top