Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Posted twice, please ignore and delete

Yennee

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
72
My Brother brought up a good, and terrible point:
This discussion, he could see persuading people to venture away from the Faith, entirely.

A terrifying point:

In person, two persons "of meat" in the Faith may have a conversation of meat. However, there are those, as Paul mentioned, who are of milk, and not ready to receive meat. *Because we're on a forum*, an individual of milk can go through and fall deep into a meaty discussion they cannot bear, of which those of meat or essentially warned nottto thrust upon those of milk, lest they stumble or fall away.

We are not to so much as offend our weaker brethren. How do we protect them from delving too deep, when we are the ones doing it before their very eyes!?

*How do we address ^this^ terrible matter?*





Oh, why is there no *"Friends"* or *"Lovers"* (those seeking marriage, not fooling around), or other social forums alongside men, women, and married?? There's more to Fellowship than of marriage and the division of the only 2 genders/sexes that exist.

Folks these days don't know how to make friends, have a casual conversation, what's appropriate sexually and romantically and socially-sexually (public displays and pursuits if romantic affections).

**We need to address this, and I have nowhere to post!!!**





P.S. What about a discussion area for confusion??
Ex:
Raped by animals. Happened to me and many others as a child! And the Lord's Word says "it is confusion" about this 1, specific form!

Gender confusion! Folks growing up without 2 heterosexual parents in 1 house, and perverted media.

What many say, verses what the Bible actually says! "Masturbation is a sin!", but scholars, Believers, and hottly determined atheists cannot find this in The Law! Moreover, Leviticus and Deuteronomy mention emission of seed without a partner, and how it is unclean, but *no sin offering is required!*

Surely, y'all can think of others.
 
My Brother brought up a good, and terrible point:
This discussion, he could see persuading people to venture away from the Faith, entirely.

A terrifying point:

In person, two persons "of meat" in the Faith may have a conversation of meat. However, there are those, as Paul mentioned, who are of milk, and not ready to receive meat. *Because we're on a forum*, an individual of milk can go through and fall deep into a meaty discussion they cannot bear, of which those of meat or essentially warned nottto thrust upon those of milk, lest they stumble or fall away.

We are not to so much as offend our weaker brethren. How do we protect them from delving too deep, when we are the ones doing it before their very eyes!?

*How do we address ^this^ terrible matter?*





Oh, why is there no *"Friends"* or *"Lovers"* (those seeking marriage, not fooling around), or other social forums alongside men, women, and married?? There's more to Fellowship than of marriage and the division of the only 2 genders/sexes that exist.

Folks these days don't know how to make friends, have a casual conversation, what's appropriate sexually and romantically and socially-sexually (public displays and pursuits if romantic affections).

**We need to address this, and I have nowhere to post!!!**





P.S. What about a discussion area for confusion??
Ex:
Raped by animals. Happened to me and many others as a child! And the Lord's Word says "it is confusion" about this 1, specific form!

Gender confusion! Folks growing up without 2 heterosexual parents in 1 house, and perverted media.

What many say, verses what the Bible actually says! "Masturbation is a sin!", but scholars, Believers, and hottly determined atheists cannot find this in The Law! Moreover, Leviticus and Deuteronomy mention emission of seed without a partner, and how it is unclean, but *no sin offering is required!*

Surely, y'all can think of others.
I understand, but need to have experience and spiritually wise elders. male and female. moderators and time periods. Who can put their hands in the mud. and make suave for the eyes. And put "TRUTH" before feelings. The last part is the hardest. Many cannot handle serpents let alone the meaning of The biblical word.
 
.
in Genesis 38 - where Onan " ruined " or “ corrupted “ his seed that was supposed to be used to creating a son in his sacred act of intercourse with his brother's widowed wife.

The very Hebrew word that the translators are claiming is - “ spilled “

is not ever used again in the translation as the word “ spilled " -

it is not used in any other verse in the entire translation.

The Hebrew word is < " Destroyed " or " Corrupted " - a total of 145 times in the Old Testament and one single time it is used to say “ spilled “ This word is - שָׁחַת Shâchath / Shaw-khath' .

Onan was not punished or killed for simply spilling his seed - this is a Trinitarian untruthful Translation.
Never is this word used as the word " SPILLED " ever in the entire total 145 times in the Old Testament but one single time it is used to say “ spilled “ - this is how Trinitarians invent their entire faith system.

Onan did not have to marry his sister in law but he choose to and he also pledged to have sexual intercourse with her SPECIFICALLY for the SPECIFIC purpose and pledge that he would provide her with a very valuable seed.

Onan broke the law by committing, pledging and agreeing to participate in a sacred marriage plan and he engaged in sexual intercourse with her - but he was deceptive and untruthful and he also lied. Onan Committed to the marriage and agreed and went into Her and had sex with her but pulled out during intercourse and wasted and corrupted / destroyed His own seed onto the ground
. But the law of God designed this marriage plan with this obligation and requirement and Onan refused and broke his word and very vow that he had pledged and agreed to – in marrying her to share an inheritance with her and her eldest son.

He defrauded and cheated his own brother and the widowed wife out of the inheritance and birthright and simply and solely was using the woman for sex and he did it deliberately and purposefully – – and not treating her as family or even with dignity – as he would the rest of his other wives. Onan should have chosen not to marry His brother's wife and let her marry someone who would bring Her a seed and inheritance.

Also " / " - I noticed that You had mentioned the subject of homosexuality and we know that according to the Bible and The Law Of God - the act of Homosexuality ( homosexual sex ) - is considered
so wrong, so perverted and evil. I found that that this sexual act is never, ever even once used by God when SYMBOLICALLY, comparing the acts of spiritual perversion to the acts of this homosexual act

But Even bestiality is used as a symbolic metaphor when God symbolically compares the wrong doings of people who disobeyed Him. As we see here in Eze 23:19 - Yet she ( Israel ) multiplied her whoredoms, ... and played the harlot in the land of Egypt. “20 For she doted upon their connecting wives , whose flesh is as the flesh of donkeys, and whose fluids / issues are like the issue ( gushing of fluid / SEMEN ) - of horses. - - Sexual sins of adultery and fornication are all widely used in the Bible to symbolize in metaphors as = the acts of disobedience to God - as if one is committing adultery against God - by disobeying Him. Even bestiality is used as an example but Pedophilia and Homosexuality are two of the sexual sins that God never ever uses in symbolic meanings to compare the sins of disobedience to God.
 
Back
Top