What do you believe and know about the giants?

[Admon Mikha'el]

But why would the world of science go to such great measures to cover up their existence?

And what do you know and believe about the existence of the giants?

Science does not want to aknowledge God or even the possibility of God, so they deny the bible. They want their evolution theories....In North America, the Smithsonian was built and given a mandate to round up all the bones of the giants they could and make them disappear...
Other countries have their own organiizations to do the same job...Sardinia...or Giant Central There they have a powerful organization to destroy all the bones....If you go to Sardinia to see the graves of the giants, you will find yourself followed by the military whose job it is to , see you don't find anything...and if you do....to make it disappear, and possibly you too.

 

[Waggles]

2Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into Tartarus and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment;

Jude 1:6 And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment
of the great day —

 

[backNforth]

...Genesis says that before the flood, fallen demonic spirits had children by human women.

1- There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after the flood...

2- They were not "fallen demonic spirits." The giants were the offspring of the fallen ones and the earthly women they mated with. IOW, the offspring were a "hybrid" of fallen angel and human.

...the teaching that there are modern people in modern times who are descended from demons...

It's not about descendancy; it's about the consequences of willful choices - both for the one in authority (e.g. father/mother), and for the one under that authority (e.g. offspring).

If willfully eating a forbidden fruit brought death, what could willfully accepting a poison injection bring? What will the consequences be for the offspring of the jabbed (I deal with this often in deliverance i.e. generational demonization)?

...the denial of the doctrine of Free Will.

As I've illustrated, this claim is a non sequitur.

...the doctrine of "giants in the land" violates the Jeffersonian principle that all men are created equal, by teaching that "demon blood" is more powerful than either human bloodlines alone and more influential on the person's life than either spirituality or pedagogy.

Followers of Christ are not concerned with man's "doctrines" or "Jeffersonian principles." This is not about "demon blood" and, apart from Christ, "human bloodlines" wield zero power.

Witches and Calvinists who believe in "giants" minimize the doctrine of the fall and doctrines of the soul, the teaching of the Holy Spirit, the practice of prayer, and a host of other spiritual teachings and practices in the Christian church.

A "belief" in giants, and the reality of their existence, should not be conflated.

2Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into Tartarus and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment;

Jude 1:6 And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment
of the great day —

Yep, some, but not all, of the fallen ones are thus imprisoned. Meanwhile, the spirits of their drowned progeny remain among us, and their physical re-emergence in a post-flood world (i.e. "and also after that") is also a reality.

 

[theLeadmonger]

1- There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after the flood...

2- They were not "fallen demonic spirits." The giants were the offspring of the fallen ones and the earthly women they mated with. IOW, the offspring were a "hybrid" of fallen angel and human.



It's not about descendancy; it's about the consequences of willful choices - both for the one in authority (e.g. father/mother), and for the one under that authority (e.g. offspring).

If willfully eating a forbidden fruit brought death, what could willfully accepting a poison injection bring? What will the consequences be for the offspring of the jabbed (I deal with this often in deliverance i.e. generational demonization)?


As I've illustrated, this claim is a non sequitur.


Followers of Christ are not concerned with man's "doctrines" or Jefferson's principles. This is not about "demon blood" and, apart from Christ, "human bloodlines" wield zero power.


A "belief" in giants, and the reality of their existence, should not be conflated.


Yep, some, but not all, of the fallen ones are thus imprisoned. Meanwhile, the spirits of their drowned progeny remain among us, and their physical re-emergence in a post-flood world (i.e. "and also after that") is also a reality.

Fascinating. Tell me what you see as the forbidden fruit. After Eve and Adam ate it, they were expelled from the garden, so that they could not then also eat from the tree of life, which would have made an evil first family immortal. Neith Cain nor Able ate from the tree, and neither did Seth. Enoch and Eligah, who were both translated, were saved in early times by God, they had not eaten from the tree of life.

Since the expulsion from the Garden of Eden, the tree of life has been inaccessible to man, and salvation has relied on following the law, piety in service, belief in the coming messiah, and acceptance of His status and teaching in the world since the crucifixion.

Regarding your beliefs on Free Will and human choice, are you looking more at smaller "God is in the details" morals and dogma style practice, or more at faith alone, which could have been in anything after all, including Thomas Jefferson, or something else? Do you theorize that Satanists have an "Antichrist communion" of forbidden fruit, or are you simply a stateless republican socially following the ten commandments' laws without reference to national status, or Hebrew tribal status, or racial birth?

 

[backNforth]

Tell me what you see as the forbidden fruit. After Eve and Adam ate it, they were expelled from the garden, so that they could not then also eat from the tree of life...

In Jewish tradition, the Tree of Knowledge and the eating of its fruit represents the beginning of the mixture of good and evil together. Before that time, the two were separate, and evil had only a nebulous existence in potential.

The tree of knowledge brings death.

The dominion granted to Adam over all the earth was conditional. Of course, Satan seized on that opportunity.

Regarding your beliefs on Free Will and human choice...

I have no such "beliefs." I only know Christ and him crucified.

...are you looking more at smaller "God is in the details" morals and dogma style practice, or more at faith alone, which could have been in anything after all, including Thomas Jefferson, or something else?

Neither.

Do you theorize that Satanists have an "Antichrist communion" of forbidden fruit...?

I don't "theorize." I do know that Satanists continue to gorge themselves on that forbidden fruit/tree of knowledge as their main course.

...or are you simply a stateless republican socially following the ten commandments' laws without reference to national status, or Hebrew tribal status, or racial birth?

ROFL! and not facetiously, either. Folks seem unable to resist the conditioning to slot what they do not understand.

Republican, national/tribal status, racial birth - all traps for young players.

 

[theLeadmonger]

Well, if you're happy being a Man Without a Country, that's on you.

I'd have said the tree of knowledge of good and evil was poetically described in a false dichotomy, evil is the opposite of good. "Eating it", symbolically, is not a two-branch choice, but rather just doing the opposite of a divine command so you'll know where that branch in the decision tree leads to.

As far as your faith regarding the modern knowledge of good and evil, have you ever read Fredrick Nietzsche, or examined his original source references and citations? Nietzsche wrote on the conditions of people and the world who had partaken, and the society they would live in as they moved on from the tree of knowledge experience. His Zarathustra was based on Persian writings (maybe genuine and maybe of later fabrication) from the time of Cyrus the Persian, the same Cyrus the Persian mentioned in the Biblical Book of Daniel as the ally of Derius the Mede, who diverted the Tigris and Euphrates rivers and conquered Babylon. One reference for you to look at is Khalil Gibran's "The Prophet".

Just out of curiosity, why did you decide to renounce your citizenship and assume alien status? You still have civil rights under Israeli law, of course, but do you even speak Hebrew? You cut yourself off from the United States, and for all I know, in your local municipality, none of the judges might be biblically literate enough to grant you Deuteronomic status at a trial or court hearing anyway. It must have been your parents. I know many new immigrants locally who shelter in sanctuary churches and study Ancient Hebrew in the evenings and on the weekend in case the Department of Immigration catches them. Don't worry, Barach Obama and Joseph Biden will see to it that you are fully integrated and granted welfare, refugee immunity, a free education and an affirmative action job.

 

[backNforth]

Well, if you're happy being a Man Without a Country, that's on you.

Jesus was one such "Man Without a Country;" I want to be like him.
But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city. (Hebrews 11:16)

...have you ever read Fredrick Nietzsche, or examined his original source references and citations?

Yeah, that piece of social conditioning trash was required reading in Caesar's God-less schools. A passionate atheist, Nietzsche said God is dead, a fiction created by human beings; then he went insane.

ust out of curiosity, why did you decide to renounce your citizenship and assume alien status?

"Citizenship" is a corporate fiction, Maritime Admiralty law, an invention of Caesar to bring men into bondage, which is where the majority are right now. And I have certainly not "assume[d] alien status."

You still have civil rights under Israeli law, of course

All "rights" offered by Caesar are conditional. I neither claim nor accept any such things.

"Civil rights" is Caesar's invention. There is only one "right" mentioned in the Holy Bible: the right of believers to the tree of life. (Rev.22:14)

...but do you even speak Hebrew?

If I don't, it is to my heavenly benefit.

You cut yourself off from the United States,..

Yeah, and I repented for not doing it sooner.

...and for all I know, in your local municipality, none of the judges might be biblically literate enough to grant you Deuteronomic status at a trial or court hearing anyway.

I don't have anything to do with the world's "judges."

It must have been your parents. I know many new immigrants locally who shelter in sanctuary churches and study Ancient Hebrew in the evenings and on the weekend in case the Department of Immigration catches them. Don't worry, Barach Obama and Joseph Biden will see to it that you are fully integrated and granted welfare, refugee immunity, a free education and an affirmative action job.

Well, well. The trolls are busy fishing. Looks like an A.I. response if there ever was one!

Getting back to StewardoftheMystery's OP,

The only way there could be a remnant of the giants left after the flood is if the “seed” was spiritual in meaning.

This is not necessarily true. Satan is not about to change a game plan that works. Throughout history, genetic manipulation has been integral to gaining access to the temple (i.e. the believer's body).

The Holy Bible states, "...and also after that..." so the existence of post-flood giants is within God's purview.