@Dave L. @Butch5,
@Brother Paul,
@DieAmartyr,
@Andyindauk,
@Christ4Ever,
@Admon Mikha'el,
@Br. Bear,
@Rockerduck,
@Sue D.
Hello there,
I have just read through the thread once more, and have enjoyed reading the exchanges between each one. Thank you Dave L for introducing the subject, and to you all for the thought provoking points raised along the way.
* There are two passages of Scripture which I would like to share, which my mind has been drawn to recently, and which has application to this subject, I believe. The first is
John 14:26:-
'But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost,
whom the Father will send in My name,
He shall teach you all things,
and bring all things to your remembrance,
whatsoever I have said unto you.'
* The words, 'The Comforter', is followed by the word, 'which', because it is referring to the work that He would do, whereas the words, 'the Holy Ghost, is followed by the word, 'Whom', for it is referring to the being of the Holy Ghost, which the Father would send in Jesus name. Then the word, 'He' personifies Him, as did the word, 'Whom'. He is not just an extention of God the Father, He is also not just power from on high, as some say. He is the Holy Spirit who is sent from God the Father.
'Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.
And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord.
And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.
But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.'
(1Co 12:4)
* The other passage of Scripture which came to mind was, 1 Corinthians 15:27-28:-
' For He (God the Father) hath put all things under His feet .(God the Son)
But when He saith all things are put under Him,
it is manifest that He is excepted, which did put all things under Him.
And when all things shall be subdued unto Him,
then shall the Son also Himself be subject
unto Him that put all things under Him,
that God may be all in all.'
* The role of the Son is a means to an end in the purposes of God, as is the role of the Holy Spirit. The end being that 'God may be all in all'. Praise God!
* I feel that God is endeavouring to impart something to our minds: (the infinite to the finite) and is therefore condescending to use words and concepts which we can understand to explain what to the finite mind is inexplicable. Therefore rather than trying to rationalise these things, by using words such as TRINITY, why do we not stay within the confines of the words and concepts that God has used in His Word, and just accept what is written for our learning in simple faith?
* I hope this makes sense.
Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris