Admon Mikha'el
Active
In several places throughout the bible there are references to things that came before....The fallen angels, possible references to a preAdamic race....You have to see them.Okay. I'm all ears (eyes).
In several places throughout the bible there are references to things that came before....The fallen angels, possible references to a preAdamic race....You have to see them.Okay. I'm all ears (eyes).
Brother,In several places throughout the bible there are references to things that came before....The fallen angels, possible references to a preAdamic race....You have to see them.
Let us learn from what scripture truly teaches us and not add to the story - you are promulgating mediaeval Roman Church teaching here - the same teaching that insisted that the Earth was in the centre of the solar system.
Also you are adding a great deal of evolutionary theory to the story of creation.
The differences between the six major human races is more than skin colour - there are a lot of physiological differences. Compare the negroid peoples of sub-Sahara Africa with the Chinese peoples of eastern Asia.
Brother,In several places throughout the bible there are references to things that came before....The fallen angels, possible references to a preAdamic race....You have to see them.
Read the scriptures and stick to what scripture actually teachesBrother,
Adam is the "first man." 1 Corinthians 15:45. Eve was created from Adam, and Adam called his wife Eve "because she was the mother of all the living." Genesis 3:20. If Seth came right after Abel's death, then it is possible that in the 130 years before Seth's birth that Adam and Eve had scores of (perhaps over 100) children. It is plausible that Cain feared one of his siblings avenging their brother Abel's murder. As far as a pre-Adamic race of people, Scripture does not point in that direction.
Please provide such scriptures.It is the BIBLE that says there is only one human race
Again pure conjecture.Also, if Adam and Eve had scores of children in the 130 years before Seth was born, then it's absolutely plausible that those chidren married when they reached the age of marrying and they had chidren, and then their children had children, and so on...
Just for example: if Adam and Eve had 100 children after Abel and before Seth, and after the first male and female turned 16 years old they procreated, and then every year afterwards all of the children that could procreate did procreate, and that cycle of procreation continued until God marked Cain, there could have been over 100,000 people on earth.
True, scripture is silent on whether Adam and Eve had children after Cain, Abel, and in the 130 years before Seth. However, I'm going to say they did because they were humans with human passions for sexual relations, and then their children and their grand and great-grand children and great-great-great grand children had the same human passions for sexual relations. So, yes, there were thousands of people walking the earth in the 130 years before Seth was born, and before Cain slew Abel.Read the scriptures and stick to what scripture actually teaches
"then it is possible that in the 130 years before Seth's birth that Adam and Eve had scores of (perhaps over 100) children" - scripture does not teach such speculation - you are adding your own ideas derived from mediaeval church
teachings to the narrative. Go back and read how the story in Genesis actually unfolds.
Cain was concerned that other people would take vengeance on him and further he left and married a woman (which is good) before Seth was born. And there is no teaching in scripture that other children to Adam & Eve were
born before Seth (otherwise in the genealogies of Jesus to Adam would include any other son prior to Seth).
"As far as a pre-Adamic race of people, Scripture does not point in that direction" - oh yes they do for Genesis 1 is a different story to Genesis 2.
Abel was the first one Eve lost, obviously. Thus the statement of Eve that God had appointed her another child for the murdered Abel.Again pure conjecture.
Where does the narrative in Genesis 1-5 lay this out in detail for us to know.
Genesis 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again, and she bore a son and called his name Seth, for she said, “God has appointed for me another offspring instead of Abel, for Cain killed him.”
I seriously doubt that Eve would have made such a statement if she had already other sons and daughters.
That is illogical - if Eve had another son before Seth then she would have made this claim about him, and not in regard to Seth.Abel was the first one Eve lost, obviously. Thus the statement of Eve that God had appointed her another child for the murdered Abel.
Why is that? Because you say so? All the hundreds or thousands of children and grandchildren of Eve had were still alive before Cain murdered Abel. Thus the statement of Eve.That is illogical - if Eve had another son before Seth then she would have made this claim about him, and not in regard to Seth.
And this earlier son is not mentioned in the genealogies of Jesus back to Adam.
Why would any child beside Seth need to be mentioned in the genealogy? One generation to the next.That is illogical - if Eve had another son before Seth then she would have made this claim about him, and not in regard to Seth.
And this earlier son is not mentioned in the genealogies of Jesus back to Adam.
Both Genesis 1 and genesis 4 give good evidence for pre-Adamic peoples.After admonishing me for adding to scripture, you add a pre-Adamic race where one clearly does not exist. LOL
Where??? Quote the scriptures in Genesis 4 to substantiate such speculation.All the hundreds or thousands of children and grandchildren of Eve had were still alive before Cain murdered Abel.
After you give me Scripture that says Adam was not the first man.Where??? Quote the scriptures in Genesis 4 to substantiate such speculation.
Really??Why would any child beside Seth need to be mentioned in the genealogy? One generation to the next.
That proves God chose Seth just as God chose Abram, just as God chose Isaac, just as God chose Jacob, and just as God chose Ephraim.Really??
Is not the first born the one to inherit a blessing and a double portion??
If there was a son before Seth he would be in scripture and he would be in any genealogy -
Luke 3:37 the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalaleel, the son of Cainan,
3:38 the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.
see there is no other son between Seth and Adam.
Genesis 1:26 And God said, let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the heavens, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over all the creepers creepingAfter you give me Scripture that says Adam was not the first man.