Rhema
Active
No it doesn't.You would have to go directly to read the Hebrew scripture and then do the direct translation of it not using a computer because the computer will auto correct everything as it is anyways.
Rhema
(It didn't correct you.)
No it doesn't.You would have to go directly to read the Hebrew scripture and then do the direct translation of it not using a computer because the computer will auto correct everything as it is anyways.
Look up actual translation from Hebrew to English
You may not find it nowadays as everything is going through AI. It is the literal translation and not the actual translation.
I rather think you looked up the wrong word.For me when I did it I went to the library and I looked it up in the Webster's not the dictionary but the other one I can't think of the name of it. It stated that the words I am who I am cannot be translated correctly into the English language because we do not have a singular plural noun.
PS: Just to say, I have the actual book in my hands, Bill, and Dylan's entry from the Greek Orthodox Study Bible is spot on.As I told you trying to get things off the internet is highly unlikely to give you what you're looking for because it does too much autocorrect before you have a chance.
Thank you Dylan, it rather saved me the work of typing it in.The Orthodox Study Bible of 2008, as customary for the Orthodox Church, uses the Septuagint and the annotation on Exodus 3:14 reads:
"The name I AM the Existing One is the name for the Essence of God, which is one and undivided (AthanG, JohnDm). This Essence is like a boundless sea, containing all things yet not contained by anything. The Son is eternally begotten from the Essence of the Father. When Jesus said He was the Existing One, the Jews who were listening took up stones to stone Him, for they knew this passage in Exodus (Jn 8:57-59). He is acknowledged as the Existing One in every Vespers service of the Church."
Really there's a difference between entity and person then you don't understand God at all.You are using non-standard theological or doctrinal language that is very misleading. You wrote as follows:
"...there is a God and then there's the Spirit of God as two separate entities and yet one God"
The Athanasian Creed
"Now this is the catholic faith: that we worship one God in Trinity and the Trinity in unity, neither confounding their persons nor dividing the essence. For the person of the Father is a distinct person, the person of the Son is another, and that of the Holy Spirit still another. But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal." This creed is online with the scripture proofs.
Athanasian Creed According to Scripture
steadfastlutherans.org
From the Merriam-Webster
"person 3 a: one of the three modes of being in the Trinitarian Godhead as understood by Christians b: the unitary personality of Christ that unites the divine and human natures"
entity 1 a: BEING, EXISTENCE especially :independent, separate, or self-contained existence
b: the existence of a thing as contrasted with its attributes
2 : something that has separate and distinct existence and objective or conceptual reality
When you look at the definitions of the words it is obvious the problems that can develop when you leave accepted theological language. The Trinity is difficult enough without adding to the difficulty with non-standard, misleading words.
"In the beginning the Word already was. The Word was in God’s presence, and what God was, the Word was." (John 1:1 REB)
The translator discussion from the NET2.1 Bible on John 1:1 as quoted from the REB -
" From a technical standpoint, though, it is preferable to see a qualitative aspect to anarthrous θεός in John 1:1c (ExSyn 266-69). Translations like the NEB, REB, and Moffatt are helpful in capturing the sense in John 1:1c, that the Word was fully deity in essence (just as much God as God the Father). However, in contemporary English “the Word was divine” (Moffatt) does not quite catch the meaning since “divine” as a descriptive term is not used in contemporary English exclusively of God. The translation “what God was the Word was” is perhaps the most nuanced rendering, conveying that everything God was in essence, the Word was too. This points to unity of essence between the Father and the Son without equating the persons."
There is a difference between "entity" and "person" as seen in the Trinity. The Trinity is difficult enough without muddying the waters with unusual wording. You get the last word on this.![]()
So you looked it up on a computer which translates for you, you'll never understand what I'm trying to tell you. Because the computer translates it for you. Really need to go to the specific verbiage not through the computer and translate it
Follow the link, Bill, and you tell me what is wrong with what you said.
I rather think you looked up the wrong word.
There is quite a difference between אֱלֹהִים֙ and אֶֽהְיֶ֑ה.
Follow the link, I'm sure you'll figure it out.
Rhema
Who readily admits that Hebrew makes his head hurt.
And just who made up that rule?
When someone tells me the Holy Spirit told them thus and so, I compare it to what the Scriptures state as -One can arrive at the truth of God every single time simply by listening to the teacher and counsellor God gave us, the Holy Spirit. Anyone can be called foolish that undertakes to read the Word without the Holy Spirit guiding him. The Word is not so much for the intellect as for the spirit
Most of what the Holy Spirit says to you is for YOU. Not for telling others...Its for YOUR growthWhen someone tells me the Holy Spirit told them thus and so, I compare it to what the Scriptures state as -
"To the law and to the testimony! if they speak not according to this word, surely there is no morning for them." (Isa 8:20 ASV)
If it is a question of interpretation, I try to do as Jesus did when tempted by the devil. Scripture to Scripture, "It is written", "It is written", and then "Again it is written". Compare Scripture to Scripture.
But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
1Jn 2:27 But as for you, the anointing (the sacred appointment, the unction) which you received from Him abides [permanently] in you; [so] then you have no need that anyone should instruct you. But just as His anointing teaches you concerning everything and is true and is no falsehood, so you must abide in (live in, never depart from) Him [being rooted in Him, knit to Him], just as [His anointing] has taught you [to do]. (AMP)
1Co 2:12 Now we have not received the spirit [that belongs to] the world, but the [Holy] Spirit Who is from God, [given to us] that we might realize and comprehend and appreciate the gifts [of divine favor and blessing so freely and lavishly] bestowed on us by God.
1Co 2:13 And we are setting these truths forth in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the [Holy] Spirit, combining and interpreting spiritual truths with spiritual language [to those who possess the Holy Spirit].
1Co 2:14 But the natural, nonspiritual man does not accept or welcome or admit into his heart the gifts and teachings and revelations of the Spirit of God, for they are folly (meaningless nonsense) to him; and he is incapable of knowing them [of progressively recognizing, understanding, and becoming better acquainted with them] because they are spiritually discerned and estimated and appreciated.
1Co 2:15 But the spiritual man tries all things [he examines, investigates, inquires into, questions, and discerns all things], yet is himself to be put on trial and judged by no one [he can read the meaning of everything, but no one can properly discern or appraise or get an insight into him]. (AMP)
My favorite way to describe Abba is He whom is ancient before days.. idk I just really like thatReally there's a difference between entity and person then you don't understand God at all.
You know I really get amused when people try to tell me that God is spirit. But I do understand that that's the only way that people can describe God. Even in the scripture it's the only way that they can describe God as spirit. But God is much more than spirit. God is God and there's no real description of that. Remember God created spirits.
God is more than his creation.
To me the term entity is the best way I can describe the individual aspects of God. Others say the three persons in God, but they mean the same to me. Only twice in my life have I experienced the Trinity as One. In both cases it was in spiritual warfare, and it was the Trinity acting against the darkness.
I can say that I've heard the voice of the Trinity in that moment, it was awesome.
It needs saying.So you looked it up on a computer which translates for you, you'll never understand what I'm trying to tell you. Because the computer translates it for you. Really need to go to the specific verbiage not through the computer and translate it
What a nasty thing to say. Just plain nasty.Really need to go to the specific verbiage not through the computer and translate it
And so you place the Holy Spirit subordinate to your books.When someone tells me the Holy Spirit told them thus and so, I compare it to what the Scriptures state as -
The proper term is "attributes of God". To avoid thinking of God with just one attribute, such as "God is love", many illustrate the attributes like the spokes on a wagon wheel. All are needed for a proper view of God. Here are a few, God is:Really there's a difference between entity and person then you don't understand God at all.
You know I really get amused when people try to tell me that God is spirit. But I do understand that that's the only way that people can describe God. Even in the scripture it's the only way that they can describe God as spirit. But God is much more than spirit. God is God and there's no real description of that. Remember God created spirits.
God is more than his creation.
To me the term entity is the best way I can describe the individual aspects of God. Others say the three persons in God, but they mean the same to me. Only twice in my life have I experienced the Trinity as One. In both cases it was in spiritual warfare, and it was the Trinity acting against the darkness.
I can say that I've heard the voice of the Trinity in that moment, it was awesome.