By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!@ushalk
There is none. Church is the body of Christ. I don't agree with the whole numerous denominations thing but it's done and our job is to spend time wisely preaching the gospel not criticizing the church. Let's focus on the leading of the Holy Spirit.
There are no denominations in the Bible or in heaven and only church buildings made by man in this physical world. The biblical mentioning of church was of no denomination but the body of Christ.
Hello James.Denominations are God's permissive will, not His perfect will.
Yet, they are intrinsically linked to God's purpose and plan and used by Him.
God uses imperfect vessels, and He also uses imperfect organizations of man, including, but not limited to, the Roman Catholic church.
Individually we should walk according to the light that we have each received.
One man's light leads him to a particular denomination, another man's light leads him to reject denominations completely.
We are each accountable to the Lord alone in this matter.
Hello James.
You have an opinion on this subject that I find difficult to comprehend.
God's permissive will? Satan is included in God's so called 'permissive will' but satan
will be dealt with very harshly by God.
I would not be using the phrase 'permissive will' so loosely James. Because something
that is permissible within the domain of God's sovereignty never implies that the action
itself is acceptable in any manner.
Cults exist within this domain and the members of the cults seek to steer people away
from Christ. Some churches also perform the same function as the cults, nothing can
be gained by attending these churches. They are entirely opposed to truth and sound
doctrine, they will lead you far from Christ.
If you can please explain which particular church is the right one? I was referring to denominations not to cults.Yes God's permissive will does not imply it is right. We have to be pragmatic about it DHC. God's perfect will is the ideal, but we know things will never be ideal. Denominations are not ideal, but they are necessary...otherwise we'd all be Roman Catholic now I suppose, if it weren't for the necessity of the reformation.
There cannot be a visible, doctrinal, manifestation of the church in the world. According to theIf you can please explain which particular church is the right one? I was referring to denominations
not to cults.
Rather the will of God is that you conform to Jesus Christ and the doctrine of Godliness.God's perfect will is the ideal, but we know things will never be ideal.
Denominations have nothing to do with the kingdom of God, they are simply religious divisionsDenominations are not ideal, but they are necessary
Neither Catholicism nor any Reformation matters, only the Gospel of Jesus Christ and all whootherwise we'd all be Roman Catholic now I suppose, if it weren't for the necessity of the
reformation.
There cannot be a visible, doctrinal, manifestation of the church in the world. According to the
scripture the essence of the real church conforms to the following.
2 Corinthians 4:18
we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which
are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.
The true church has always been an invisible church, it is a spiritual entity built by the Lord
Jesus Christ. It only has ever been composed of those who love Jesus Christ.
It is composed of the chosen of Jesus Christ and is only founded on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
This church has no worldly name and is void of worldly membership. It is powered and governed
by the Holy Spirit. All ministries and gifts of the Holy Spirit will be evident to some extent in this
church. You will know when you are in one of the true churches, because the Holy Spirit will make
this abundantly clear to you.
You have seen the truth that denominations are wrong. However concerning the nature of the church, you believe in the invisible/visible division which is not supported by Scripture. This is an idea which arose as a response to many unsaved people and wordliness existing in "state churches" and denominations. Roman Catholic and Protestant alike were state churches. A person was born into these churches but many did not actually believe in Christ and were in fact unsaved. As a consequence, a natural reaction is to say that visible church = imperfect, invisible church = perfect. In the visible church is true and false Christians but in the invisible church is only true Christians. But this view is wrong for a number of reasons. Firstly, any entity in which unsaved people are members, are not true churches, either visibly or invisibly - only believers can be the church. Let us face the fact, that any church which has unsaved people in it, is not a true church. Secondly, believers on the Earth are not only spiritual, but also physical and visible.
In Scripture there are many examples which show the visible nature of church:
John 13:35 "Your love for one another will prove to the world that you are my disciples"
1 Cor 14:24 But if all of you are prophesying, and unbelievers or people who don't understand these things come into your meeting, they will be convicted of sin and judged.
Our light must shine before men (Matt 5:16). In Revelation, each church has a visible lampstand, shining its light for the world to see.
The church on earth is to be seen by the world. Jesus said his church was like a city on a hill (Matt 5:14). The future New Jerusalem will also be visible coming down from heaven.
In contrast to the idea that there cannot be a visible manifestation of the church in the world - in the time of the New Testament the church was very much visible and tangible. Church in Ephesus, Corinth etc. They were governed by the Holy Spirit operating in and through the elders appointed by the apostles.
The concept of saying here is a visible church (e.g. Roman Catholic church), and within this church is saved and unsaved, and these saved people are the "invisible true church", a "invisible true church within a false visible church" is not a biblical concept. The truth is, this saved/unsaved mixture visible church is not a church at all, and the saved people in it should separate themselves from the world, by coming out of this "church", and maintaining their own visible presence on the Earth, as they were in the New Testament.
Denominations are prohibited, verbotten.You have seen the truth that denominations are wrong.
Are all churches that claim to be Christian churches really authentic churches of Christ?However concerning the nature of the church, you believe in the invisible/visible division which
is not supported by Scripture.
Firstly, salvation is administered at a personal level, a person must believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ.In the visible church is true and false Christians but in the invisible church is only true Christians.
This is primarily a personal instruction James.Our light must shine before men (Matt 5:16).
Yes James that is true but each of the seven churches were in error and needed to repent.In Revelation, each church has a visible lampstand, shining its light for the world to see.
This instruction is once again a personal instruction.Jesus said his church was like a city on a hill (Matt 5:14).
It is not the concept that is important but the reality that a church cannot save anyone.The concept of saying here is a visible church (e.g. Roman Catholic church), and within this church
is saved and unsaved, and these saved people are the "invisible true church", a "invisible true church
within a false visible church" is not a biblical concept.
Are all churches that claim to be Christian churches really authentic churches of Christ?
This is the question that we are dealing with, is the visible representative of the invisible.
Let's consult the scripture and examine a church to see if the above is true.
Galatians 5
4 You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen
from grace.
There should be no doubt that the Galatian church was at the very least a borderline church.
If the Galatian church persisted with the addition of the law to the Gospel they had 'fallen from
Grace'. So the visible church in the region of Galatia was at the time of Paul's letter not a true
church of Christ in any sense. The Galatian church was rather a church that needed to repent
for it had been bewitched by an alternative Gospel.
So in this particular case, it must hold true that the visible church was not a church of Christ.
It is irrevelant whether the Galatian church responded to the apostle Paul's warning. For at the
time Paul wrote this letter, the visible Galatian church was definitely not a true church.
So we are forced to conclude James, that any church will only ever be a true church. If and only
if the specific church is currently aligned with the apostle's teaching. Further it should be obvious
from Paul's letter to the Galatians, that any church may be mislead and church history abounds
with the failed, visible churches.
Thus James, you should have no further objection to the claim that any visible church can never
represent a true church. For the status of the church is temporal and conditional on obedience
to the apostles teaching. The visible perspective is useless in the assessment of the overall
standing of the church as a whole before the Lord.
Firstly, salvation is administered at a personal level, a person must believe the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Secondly, a person must also have received the Holy Spirit. Thirdly, the person must follow the
apostle's teaching. Organizational salvation is not within the pages of the scripture, membership
of a church body does not mean salvation.
Membership in the church is strongly encouraged but membership does not imply salvation.
An adherent of the Galatian church is never saved on the basis of their membership.
To call the Galatian church, the one and only true church of God would be erroneous.
In the Galatian church it was not their works that mattered, but who they listened to and
who they followed.
Referring to Matt 5:14, not true again. In revelation each church has only one lampstand, not many. Jesus referring to a city implies the collected body of believers in a location, and may even imply the future New Jerusalem which is the source of light to the whole earth.This instruction is once again a personal instruction.
It is not the concept that is important but the reality that a church cannot save anyone.
Only the Gospel of Jesus Christ carries the power to save and consequently the Gospel
must be believed at the primary level. This is the teaching of the apostles and this teaching
is always the primary teaching within the walls of any Christian institution.
The Catholic Church is a physical entity composed of adherents to the Catholic agenda.
The observable Catholic church is the church you have made reference to James.
But you have a vexing problem to deal with in using the Catholic church as an example.
The Catholic church is a multi denominational structure. There are thousands of
subset denominations within the Catholic membership. This is a contradiction of Paul's
instruction that there be no divisions. 'I am of Thomas', 'I am of Mary', e.t.c, this is
not in keeping with the Biblical teaching. Why is your church a contradiction of the
apostles instruction?
The New Testament refers to the physical church as the Church of God, as many as 10 times I believe.
that is what I believe it should be called.
today we have the church of immaculate conception, the church of the apostles by individual names, the church of the sacred hearts, the holy rosary church,
the list goes on and on by the thousands.
wouldn't it be nice to be unified under one name-the one the Bible called " The Church of God " - Acts 20:28
the church of God are all of us that have accepted Christ as their lord and savior. there is not one verse that refers church to a building or a denomination. the church is the body of Christ. the physical form is our bodies.
I understand the church is not a building
but the Biblical name of the true church is " The Church of God "
God names things in the Bible and He gave this name to us, His collective group of believers.
One of the identifying " signs " of the true church is that it must bear God's name.
So many groups are named after towns or countries even. Presbyterians are named after their form of government by elders or " presbyters "
Baptists are named after one doctrine-baptism.
And the list goes on.
God's name should always be attached to the true followers of the true church
we should always give this reverence and recognition to the body of Christ -the Church of God.
The Apostles did and we should observe this as well.
God built the Church and it was named after Him-that honor should be fundamental understanding to the people today.
I can agree with this if the name that we are bearing is Jesus Christ. that is the only name under heaven which we are saved by. ( Acts 4:12)
I can agree with this if the name that we are bearing is Jesus Christ. that is the only name under heaven which we are saved by. ( Acts 4:12)