Rhema
Active
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
- Messages
- 2,887
Oh for Pete's sake. I'm not the one running around here calling your church a cult or denying your guidance by the Holy Spirit. Why do you find it necessary to do that to me?Now you might consider yourself governed by man,
Now if you believe yourself to be at the pinnacle of total comprehension of the Gospel of Jesus, then what? You're just here to take pot shots at me? Rattle my cage? You wish me to validate your beliefs, and yet cannot find the grace to do so towards me?
I stand amazed that you cannot recognize the impact that Martin Luther has on your beliefs.
Am I now to presume that the Holy Spirit has guided you personally into some insight that was not accorded to Martin Luther? (I ask, because it might be so.)
And "governed by man" ?? I can allow that all of the elders in your church are believers, but at the end of it, somebody somewhere published governing rules for the style of your church service, the music, the finances, the statement of faith (or whatever) and all the other structures of behavior for your congregation. And rightly so...
(Acts 6:2-4 KJV) Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business. But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word.
So yeah, at some point, within your church, you're governed by man. (Assembly of God if I remember correctly.)
Furthermore, what word was being ministered, since none of the New Testament texts had been written yet?
Not without the direction of the Holy Spirit, since I was actually led to that which I believe today.but for your sake, I'd help you by asking you to just flip the coin to the other side.
At this point, it's not a question of what I believe, it's a question of what the Holy Spirit has taught me, which would exclude the AoP as well as the AoJ. And for the sake of transparency, that includes Hebrews, but I'm not about to ridicule anyone if they need Holy Books, although that is fraught with danger. But I believe that one's faith should be based upon having direct interaction with God as the Holy Spirit cleanses our heart. The scriptures point to God, they should not be God.Nope. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I'm a simple man. Personally, I have not read the AoP. Since you apparently have, do you believe it should be canon?
God is not pleased with this, no matter the interpretation. God was not pleased with David Koresh, God was not pleased with Harold Camping, God was not pleased with Joseph Smith, God was not pleased with William Miller, God was not pleased with Charles Taze Russell, God was not pleased with John Calvin, God was not pleased with Mary Baker Eddy, God was not pleased with John Darby. And God was not pleased with Athanasius.depending on the age in question you will find as many interpretations as possible that man can come up with!
But I also believe that you and I desire for God to be pleased with us.
I cannot be disrespectful to that which is Not the Word of God.I will not engage in a discussion about your subsequent input, as it appears to be disparaging rather than respectful towards the Word of God, which you evidently do not accept or regard as truth.
But are we discussing Logos or Rhema?
Kindly,
Rhema