DO THE NEW BIBLES MAKE JESUS A LIAR?

[Br. Bear]

You think somebody added "yet", but it could also be a possibility "yet" was removed
Either position is opinion as there are no original autographs to determine what was in them
It must be decided on an individual basis which Bible to use

Greetings @DougE

You appear to be more knowledgeable than all previous scholars yet deem your knowledge an opinion.
What I have shared is based upon the work of many more knowledgeable than myself who have gone before me and is not my opinion.

If,

It must be decided on an individual basis which Bible to use

then there is no point to your posting this thread or many like it in TalkJesus.

May I ask if you have studied any of these things you post about and how familiar you are with Greek and Hebrew and early Church history? You post as if you have some authority on the subject you write about yet pass off any attempt at Bible Study by others as of no value while exhibiting no actual learning yourself.

It is good to share concerns about what differences there are in different translations and version of the Bible. However, you make your concerns of no effect if you then render them your mere opinion and written basically, each to their own.

Where you wrote,

but it could also be a possibility "yet" was removed

could you please give some indication what proof of that you base that statement upon?

Regarding "original autographs ", I think you'll find there are plenty enough texts and manuscripts to work with. If not, how can we uphold the KJV?


Bless you ....><>

 

[DougE]

You appear to be more knowledgeable than all previous scholars yet deem your knowledge an opinion.
What I have shared is based upon the work of many more knowledgeable than myself who have gone before me and is not my opinion.

With all due respect then you are conveying their opinion
The only thing that can be definitively said is one manuscript says "yet" and the other doesn't

 

[DougE]

then there is no point to your posting this thread or many like it in TalkJesus.

I fail to understand your reasoning
How does me saying it has to be decided which Bible is chosen have to do with the pertinence of my postings?

 

[DougE]

May I ask if you have studied any of these things you post about

Yes I have

 

[DougE]

how familiar you are with Greek and Hebrew and early Church history?

Why would that be necessary?

 

[DougE]

You post as if you have some authority on the subject you write about yet pass off any attempt at Bible Study by others as of no value while exhibiting no actual learning yourself.

Haven't we had a Bible discussion?

 

[DougE]

It is good to share concerns about what differences there are in different translations and version of the Bible. However, you make your concerns of no effect if you then render them your mere opinion and written basically, each to their own.

I have merely cited verses, and point out the differences, and how it impacts doctrine
It's not my opinion that there are missing words or verses, seeing there are missing words and verses, which you can read for yourself
It would be my opinion if I asserted why there are missing words or verses, which I dont.
I can only assert that one manuscript has the word or verse, and the other doesnt

 

[DougE]

could you please give some indication what proof of that you base that statement upon?

"but it could also be a possibility "yet" was removed"​

Proof?????
If a word isnt there in a verse in one Bible and it is there in another, it was either added or removed. There are no other possibilities