I do not disagree with basis of applying our faith in Christ Jesus. The point being is "Love our Neighbors as ourselves" and how it is put to action. The assumption is the foundation of that one has is based upon you being likeminded with your neighbor and knowing first what love is to begin with and that it will be beneficial to them. This is in part is the point that I am trying to show you. Romans 13:10 states
Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
How can you be sure your actions are truly loving, and not unintentionally harming the very neighbor you claim to love through the methods you choose to help them; especially if those methods are simply the ones
you prefer? This matters all the more when alternative ways exist that achieve the same goal without the wrongs of the process you have decided to use. Put it another way: if the loving path required the long, difficult, more dangerous road rather than the easier, less dangerous one (even if the easier road is just as long or longer), would you still be willing to accept that danger, especially if it endangered not only you but your family as well and would your neighbor make that same choice? Remember that the ends do not justify the means, particularly when you know the road others will travel is likely to fail and cause them greater harm in the long run. Shelah
Agree in part. It still doesn't change what I address above in applying that very love.
You should not disagree "completely"! How can you and still be a Christian, a follower of Jesus. So, you would wrong another by satisfying your professed love for a neighbor? That is not love brother Steve! Far from it. By excusing/disregarding the very things that God has put in place (which I to have covered) to satisfy your particular actions doesn't bring justice to them or in truth change anything. All it does is switch the pain to another to have to deal with, while you walk away in the belief of having shown your love. We should not disagree with Acts 5:29! What I disagree with is how you extrapolated it to cover your own actions above what God has also established to be true.
Here is why: No one is stopping you from spreading the Word of God, only identifying your actions as being done that is contrary to what they already have in place and are doing. The issue is that they are not doing it in the way you believe they should be. That makes it your problem not theirs and has nothing to do with what happened in Acts. Scripture calls us to seek justice and care for the vulnerable (Micah 6:8; Matthew 25), and we as Christians can advocate strongly for better approaches, but that doesn't make every enforcement action a violation of 'obey God rather than men.' that you are applying to what you are doing.
We can hold a wide range of good-faith views on immigration policy while submitting to the rule of law. The verse of Acts 5:29 is powerful for religious liberty; but broadening it risks undermining the very order the Bible says God uses to restrain evil.
True—if you are applying the entirety of Scripture to your actions and are guided by the Holy Spirit. Commands are not isolated in their own bubble, granting carte blanche to do whatever one has decided is right. The negative effect on others is not mere speculation; had the rest of Scripture been weighed beforehand, the harm would be recognized as real rather than dismissed as subjectively inconsequential.
Exactly right brother. Kudos!
Now that is within the governance structure set up by God. What did our Lord say when given a Roman coin? Mark 12:17 Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s. Now, Ananias and Sapphira had a choice to make, and they took what they determined was for God, and kept it for themselves. It was the lie that cost them, because they didn't have to do any of it in the first place!
You are right it is not either/or. That is why the example I set before you. You were doing the Christian virtues, but without the Gospel being given. As you now know that won't work and you are changing accordingly. At least I truly hope so!
Now are you in charge of that 1.5 trillion? But you are in charge of what you have, after taking care of your own, so do with that as supports the helping of others. As we both know, and you have acknowledged as well, we can't take care of everyone. It's not going to happen. So, we do the best we can, in the structure that is set up. And work within the system to make it better. Again, it will come down to is the government doing all it can do? My answer is no! But do we blow it up, and why start with the government that is doing the best? Why not taking down all the other ones first, so that this country with the resources will have an example to follow.

Because if you take this one down, you'll wind up with what until a new one is established? Chaos, and even more poverty and oppression then there was before! Is this helping?
Oh, when I say give them Jesus, the Gospel which is Jesus is what is meant. You can't have the Gospel without Jesus brother!
Yes! You have your own government, established by God to work through and will have greater influence than you can as an individual. The budgeting of what is spent is not only the US but done by every other country out there! Stop trying to bring down the one country that has a greater chance of helping instill Christian values throughout the world! Try that with others, like ungodly China, and see where that will get you.
Of course you don't see it as socialism. Yet, it does more to not help the poor or I should say creates poorer people than a democracy does. The incentive that I've spoken of before, is just not there to change the people to increase productivity to allow it to be otherwise. If you don't think any government out there, be it socialism, democracy what have you don't have people lining their pockets of those already wealthy, then you're just not seeing it. For it is there even in China, or any other form of government. As we have both acknowledged before, until Jesus returns its not going to change, try as we might. Oh, and yes, we try, but remember...."process".
Because as you've said yourself, the government does a poor job of it, and in truth its not their job! Before technology increased, cars, air etc. Who divided the resources to help the poor??? It surely was not the government, but people in communities who came together to help each other. We are the Church brother!
Agree!
I support that which motivates people to being creative, because they bring to bear talents that I believe are God given. Right now, capitalism is the one system out there, at least until the return of Jesus, that does that. Oddly, enough in the world that we live in, greed & selfishness move more people to do good than the Love of God does.

That is why the Gospel and abiding in Christ Jesus, is more powerful than any other confab that one came come up with to solve that can eradicate "sin", as He did on the Cross!
Well, like you in this post I've finished the first part, but still have your next post to go that is a part of it, so don't reply to this one yet!!!
Love you brother!
With the Love in Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
Note: Normally, I double check these postings, but it's getting quite long, and I'm tired. Maybe, the next one will be shorter. I haven't looked at it yet, so it may be a couple of days before getting to it. Ah, it should give you some time to digest this long one!

\o/