God's gift of Tongues Are Not for Private Use

[Phedup]

and Peter supported him.

According to Paul he did.

2 Peter 3:15

2 Peter is most likely a forgery. Look it up. The near unanimous consenses is that it is an attribution and not authentic to Peter. That said, it is also a slap in the face to Paul under the complement. 2 Peter undercuts Paul's teaching by telling the reader that Paul is too hard for people to understand and that it will lead to their damnation. That the reader is to listent to their elders in the guidence of interpreting Paul. Or, in the words of Tertullian, "Paul is the apostle of the heretics.."-See the heresy of Marcion.

There is only one gospel for them all to share the right hand of fellowship.

The gospel of Paul and the gosple of Jesus are not only different, but are mutally exclusive of one another.

 

[Phedup]

Where are the moderators??
How much more doctrinal gobbledegook must we suffer here on TalkJesus ??

I am talking Jesus on TalkingJesus. If I am in error, show me where I am wrong. If I am not, then it is on you what to do.. Paul is not Jesus, you must choose who you are going to follow.

 

[God's Truth]

Again false doctrine.
The book of Acts (and also Jesus in John and Mark) teaches us that speaking in tongues is the evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit for every disciple who receives the Spirit.

You are not telling the truth, for scripture plainly says that NOT ALL SPOKE IN TONGUES.

The epistles to the Spirit-filled churches, the ekklesia, the saints, teaches them and us on how to walk in the Spirit and to conduct ourselves in an orderly fashion.

Which is more proof that not all spoke in tongues. Just as not all prophesied.

1Corinthians 14 is about the proper and orderly conduct of the body of Christ when holding a worship meeting - rules concerning the proper operation of the three voice gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Pentecostal churches that follow the word of God obediently and also conduct themselves in accordance to Paul's teachings are made up of Spirit-filled disciples who ALL can pray in tongues AND also some

That is not scriptural.

who can operate a different kind of tongue from their everyday prayer tongue at meetings.

Tongues is NOT a SPECIAL prayer language. Tongues, when no one can understand, is fruitless, even for the one who is talking only to God.

The one who doesn't understand what he is saying is like an UNBELIEVER who does NOT hear God.

20Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men. 21In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear me, saith the Lord. 22Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.

SPEAKING IN TONGUES IS FOR UNBELIEVERS.

If you don't understand what you are saying, you are like those who do not hear the Lord.
Tongues are a sign to them that don't believe and it caused some to hear and believe, yet some did not.

Some will speak in this different tongue by the Holy Spirit, but not all in the church operate this gift.

You contradict yourself. You said earlier all spoke in tongues.

There are also disciples who pray in tongues at home and can operate the gift of interpretation.
And likewise the same as pertaining to the gifts of prophecy.
But ALL those baptized in water and the Spirit of God can and do pray in tongues at home.

Tongues are understood in EARTHLY LANGUAGES by those who are given to hear and understand.

 

[Fragrant Grace]

Thread closed for moderation

This will take some time