Rhema. I was sharing what I found when I googled those two terms.
So you're welcome to Google them yourself.
And you can go Google and Wikipedia the Pastoral Epistles and the origin of the book of Revelation, and then deal with what you "find" contradicting what you "believe".
I have no problem with being Baptist why do You.
Well first, questions are supposed to end with a question mark, so you're making me assume you asked a question.
I have no problem with being Baptist why do You.
And yet you do have a problem with others being Catholic or Pentecostal, or even Presbyterian for that matter.
To be honest, though, the question itself shows an insular bias that is impossible to address.
No singular church put the Bible together.
The facts of history disagree with you, dearie, but why let that matter?
Just don't happen to agree with some of it.
Indeed.... you have your own opinions and have avidly expressed them with no foundation (i.e. fact or reason). Please, trumpet on...
I'd ask "Why don't you agree?" but you have no respect to answer real questions.
And, no, I'm not going expound.
It's because you truly can't... without spilling some of that tea.
Well , I've done okay for many years without your approval so will continue to do so.
It has nothing to do with MY approval. You seem happy to live as a mushroom, and will continue to do so as well, since you think that such is
okay with your God.
It was the council of Nicea.
"It"
what?
The council where a canon of scripture was established?
(or is
more accurate?)
Sue, there is nothing in the articles of canon from the council of Nicaea that establishes a canon of scripture, nor are there articles of canon that establish criteria for the selection of texts to be considered canonical.
I would strongly advise that you get a refund from your Bible College. (And improve your "Google" skills.)
Rhema