By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!This thread runs on...........
The important question remains.......Have you met Jesus.?
If you have met the Master....in whatever way....
Saul of Tarsus met Jesus riding a donkey as he pursued his religeous frame. Book of Act ch.9
Meeting Jesus is paramont....absolutely vital......debate is futile
Experience.....essential
A lot of people have MET Jesus. The rich young ruler, Judas Iscariot, the scribes, the Pharisees, Pontius Pilate, Roman soldiers, those who mocked Him, those who spat upon Him - the list is quite exhaustive. They MET Him and yet were just as LOST as a goose in a horserace! Many others throughout the last 2,000 years have MET Him through the pages of Scripture, with the same result.
Judas Iscariot's condemnation is confirmed by Scripture ( Acts 1:15-20). But, where is it shown in Scripture that the other individuals listed were never converted? Where is it shown that none of the Scribes, Pharisees, or Roman soldiers were never converted?
We need to avoid jumping to the conclusion that all of these peoples' hearts were never softened toward Him after His death and rfesurrection.To do so is to cast doubt on the Holy Spirit's power.
SLE
By way of introduction, I want to mention that when the term “Christian” was first coined in early New Testament times, it was a term of derision, as used in Acts 11:26 and 1Peter 4:16. Simply stated, when folks called someone a “Christian” it was not a term of endearment!
However, putting that history aside for the moment, let us focus on our current understanding of the term “Christian” in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century. If we conducted a survey on the streets of America, we would have an untold number of ideas and beliefs on the definition. So, let’s put aside all of the church creeds, denominational statements of faith, catechisms, confessions of faith, and such like, and let’s focus solely on what the Holy Scriptures define for us a true Christian to be.
With great appreciation, I anticipate that those who respond to this “thread” will stick strictly to the Bible as their sole authority and will quote corresponding Scripture references for their position. Any thing else offered is mere opinion - and even though opinions are interesting - they are not authoritative.
I look forward to everyone’s responses. I trust this will be an interesting study for us all. BLESSINGS. Doc
How any professing believer, with the indwelling Spirit of God, could read passages like Matthew 23:13-36 or verses like John 8:44 and walk away believing these folks could possibly have been saved is quite amazing. But, believe what you will. BLESSINGS. Doc
I see nothing in those citations that pronounces permanent condemnation on any individuals in that room. Go back to John 8:24 where Jesus tells the Pharisees they will die in their sin IF they CHOOSE TO NOT BELIEVE that He is the Messiah There's no way that I can make a blanket statement that all of the men Jesus was speaking to there were condemed to eternal Hell fire. Some of those men were present when He died and witnessed the events that followed immediately thereafter. Who's to say that their hearts were never softened?
Salvation is available to anyone who has heard the Gospel up to the very moment of death. My son died of liver disease in August of 2007. He had rejected Christianity all of his adult life until approximately thirty minutes before he passed away, when he made a sincere confession of Jesus as his Lord and Savior. I know it was sincere because I was the one who led him to Christ. The Holy Spirit's presence was palpable in that hospice room that afternoon. It was awesome!
SLE
Doc,
No offense to you but I happen to agree with SLE.
I think your statement about anyone not believing what you believe with the passages of Mathew and John and, that in your opinion, that they therefore are not indwelt with the only Holy Spirit. That’s tragic; because that is the same as saying they are not saved!?
Since Jesus would have known in advance whether these people would ultimately be saved, didn’t mean that they did not have the right to choose Him after his death and resurrection. I agree with SLE, any of these people that Jesus was referring to, could have been saved; they probably weren’t, but they had as much right to God’s Grace as anyone.
You just can’t say for sure if any of them accepted Christ or not. Jesus Christ died for all, so their sins were not the issue. And Jesus Christ said unbelief was the only sin that would keep man unsaved
If you truly believe in what you say, you run the risk of not understandings God’s Grace…God’s free gift of Christ and how He brings salvation to all who believe.
To have open statements is to have oneself misinterpreted.
There are plenty of individuals, being indwelt with the only spirit that is, that don't see it the way you do; I'm one of them.
Especially after Christ died, the truth is that anyone can blaspheme Christ and still be saved.....but, you can't blaspheme the Holy Spirit.
You have no way of knowing who recieved the Holy Spirit and who didn't in that day.
And as far as your judgement statement, when Christ died, He ushered in the New Covenant. We live in the New Covenant and , in fact, God said that he abolished the Old Covenant. You show me where the bible talks about your kind of judgement in the new testament.
Once Christ died, those people, who you say were already judged,
were forgiven for there sins as much as you or I and they have as much right to God's saving Grace.
So, my friend, we can just agree to disagree.
God's Blessing to you.
You are right.
If you or anyone else feels that we are arguing, rather than having a healthy discourse, that is negative, sinful and needs to stop.
I just happen to have a different understanding of these verse and, evidently a different understanding of Grace than you do.
We can just respectfully agree to disagree and others reading our threads can do the same.
Blessings to you and your ministry,
Joe
Doc,
With regard to our previous threads and since you persist on your point view, I feel I must reply in order for others to get a fair and balanced discussion:
- You said: The Old Testament establishes a principle that carries over into the New Testament. I totally disagree;
- The very instant that Christ died on the cross, the New Covenant of love and Grace was ushered in by God. In fact in HEB 8:13, God , at that instant, He abolished the Old Covenant (Law and Legalism).
- Your Old Covenant Marpe or "No Cure", "No deliverance', does not apply. Grace has taken over and it is free to EVERYONE and the exception, of course, are non believers.
- Grace
Look at it this way. God is a perfect and sinless being, right?
- Lasciviousness has occured and still does but not by believers. To be a believer (saved) and still live in lasciviousnes is a conundrum, the two can not coexsist. In HEB 4:4-6 Paul is actually talking about people that could live in lasciviousness. Here, Paul says it is impossible to bring people back who fall away, meaning that these are people who, may have talked a good Christian life; but, you can't bring them back because they were not saved in the first place.
- Once truly saved, always saved and you will not exhibit lasciviousness.
- Sin and Grace. Your approach is just as wrong as lasciviousness. From Romans 6: 1-11: Grace does not free us from sining, He frees us from the penalty of sin which is spiritual death. In these verses, God tells me that yes you are free from sin, dead to sin. But, you are not dead to sining!
Anything outside of His perfectness is sin. Can you go 24/7, the rest of your mortal life with out having, say, some doubt, or just being negative about something? Both are sin to God's perfectness.
When we die, God will look at us,see Jesus Christ, who lives in us and is perfect. At that point He will perfect us so we can live in His perfect realm. And as Paul puts it, we will see Him face to face and know Him as perfectly as He knows us.
But now, we are still in an imperfect state and have a sin nature. As a Christian, it is still sin, but we are not a slave to it. That has nothing to do with lasciviousness!
Thanks be to God for Jesus Christ.