v 37 Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom... 
                   God in His Sovereign wisdom allowed Babylon to exist. 
                   “Let every soul be  subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the  powers that be are ordained of God.” Rom 13:1. 
                   
                   ...power, and strength, and glory.
                   
                   v 38 And wheresoever the  children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the  heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them  all. Thou art this head of gold. 
                   Nebuchadnezzar the king of BABYLON personified his kingdom. 
                   The golden head  represented not just Nebuchadnezzar but his kingdom, for after it there  would arise “another kingdom” (v 39). Daniel uses “king” as a synonym  for “kingdom” as he does elsewwhere in his book. Compare with Dan 8:20. 
                   
                   Babylon was called the  “golden city” (Isa 14:4; Jer 51:7) and boasted the wondeful hanging  gardens, built by Nebuchadnezzar for his favourite wife who loved the  tree- covered hills of her home country, Media. 
                   A century and a half  later the Greek poet Aeschylus (who died 456B.C.) similarly wrote of  Babylon as “teeming with gold.” Heredotus (who died 424B.C.) was amazed  at the lavishness of the gold within the sanctuary of Bel-Marduk.
                   See Loeb Classical  Library, Aeschylus, Vol. 1, p115; Loeb Classical Library, Herodotus,  Vol. 1, p227, 229. Also Charles Boutflower, In and Around the Book of  Daniel, p25.
                   
                   A great religious centre,  Babylon was the centre of world idolatry. Under Nebuchadnezzar, Babylon  became the superpower of its day. Fortified by massive walls and  watered by the river Euphrates which flowed under its walls and through  the city, it was thought to be impregnable.
                   
                   v 39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom...
                   History and Scripture  show that in 539-8 BC the combined kingdom of “the MEDES and the  PERSIANS” (Dan 5:28-31), led by Cyrus, conquered Babylon. They diverted  the river Euphrates, upon which Babylon sat, (i.e. was built over) and  they went up the river bed, under the river gates, and took the city by  surprise to fulfil the prophecy: “The word that the Lord spake against  Babylon...A drought is upon her waters; they shall be dried up.” Jer  50:1, 38. See also Jer 51:11, 28;  2 Chron 36:20.
                   
                   “[Babylon had] stored  provisions enough for very many years; so they cared nothing for the  siege; and Cyrus knew not what to do...whether, then someone advised him  in his difficulty, or he perceived himself what to do, I know not, but  this is what he did...drawing off the river by canal...he made the  stream to sink till its former channel could be forded. When this  happened the Persians who were posted with this intent made their way  into Babylon by the channel of the Euphrates...and brought them to a  miserable end.” Herodotus, Book 1, sec 191; A.D. Godley, Loeb Classical  Library, p239. 
                   
                   ...inferior to thee...
                   Medo-Persia was “inferior” to Babylon not in size, as Medo-Persia was more vast than the Babylonian Empire, but in moral worth.
                   Daniel probably did not  know who this succeeding kingdom was until he read the handwriting on  the wall years after Nebuchadnezzar’s death. See Dan 5:28.
                   The historian Herodotus says Persia received tribute from subject states, paid mostly in silver talents. 
                   
                   ...and another third kingdom of brass [or bronze], which shall bear rule over all the earth. 
                   About 200 years later, at  the battle of Arbela in 331 BC, GRECIA, (the semi-Greek Macedonian  empire) led by Alexander the Great, ended the Persian reign and began to  “bear rule over all the earth” that is, it conquered everything it  attempted to.” 
                   It is interesting to note  that the Greek soldiers were known for their bronze armour. Herodotus  tells that Psammtichus I of Egypt, an older contemporary of  Nebuchadnezzar’s father, saw in the invading Greek pirates the  fulfillment of an oracle that foretold “men of bronze coming from the  sea.” Herodotus, i, 152, 154.
                   Nebuchadnezzar was probably already aware of the Greeks “another king from the west, clad in bronze,” as Josephus puts it.
                   See Josephus, Antiquities, book 10, chap. 10, sec. 4, in Loeb Classical Library, Josephus, vol. 6, p273, and note i.
                   Javan’s “vessels of  brass” (Eze 27:13) takes on new significance when one learns that Javan  is seen to refer to the Ionian Greeks.
                   In Dan 8:5-7, 20-21 the angel Gabriel clearly foretold that  “Grecia” would conquer “Media and Persia.”
                   
                   v 40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron... 
                   Like the other metallic  sections, the iron represents a singular “kingdom.” The iron of the legs  represents ROME, from its coming to power until its break-up into the  nations of Europe.
                   
                   ...forasmuch  as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that  breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise. 
                   Following Greece, Rome  rose to worldwide power, as is shown by the fact that Cæsar Augustus  could issue a decree “that all the world should be taxed” (Luke 2:1).
                   
                   “...the images of gold,  or silver, or brass, that might serve to represent the nations or their  kings, were successively broken by the iron monarchy of Rome.” Decline  and Fall of the Roman Empire, Edward Gibbon, chap. 73, par 43. 
                   
                   Polybius, a Roman historian, wrote:
                   “...the Romans have  subjected to their rule not portions, but nearly the whole of the world  (and possess an empire which is not only immeasurably greater than any  which preceded it, but need not fear rivalry in the future.)” Polybius  the Histories, translated by W. R. Patton, Loeb Classical Library, Vol.  1, p7. 
                   
                   No single rival conquered Rome, but Rome fell apart.
                   
                   The four metals thus represent, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece and Rome.
                   Any decent History book  will confirm the sequence. Stewart C. Easton’s college textbook, The  Heritage of the Ancient World, lists on its table of contents, “The  Chaldeans and the New Babylonia,” “The Great Persian Empire,” “The Greek  Civilization,” and “The foundations of the Roman Empire.” 
                   
                   v 41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided...
                   TEN divisions - THE NATIONS OF EUROPE WHICH AROSE FROM THE ROMAN EMPIRE
                   The Roman Empire was  broken up in the fourth and fifth centuries A.D. among Barbarian  invaders from Northern & Eastern Europe.
                   
                   The toes of the image  suggest that the fourth kingdom, Rome, would be divided into ten, but  the interpretation in Daniel 2 makes no mention of their number. We find  the number of divisions in Daniel 7 where the same series of four great  kingdoms is described again, under the symbols of “four great beasts.”  From the fourth beast come ten horns, declared to be “ten kings  [kingdoms].” These ten kingdoms correspond with the feet and toes of  iron and clay into which the image’s legs divided.
                   The Roman Empire was  weakened by wealth, luxury, and excess, and she could not withstand the  onslaught of the rude barbarian tribes from the north and east of  Europe. By 476AD 10 kingdoms had been established. Those which survived  make up the nations of Europe today, and are still distinctly divided.  Some have been notably strong, others weak. The prominent barbarian  tribes which became the kingdoms of Europe are:
                   
                   1. Alemani- Germans
                   2. Franks - French
                   3. Burgundians - Swiss
                   4. Suevi - Portugese
                   5. Vandals - Extinct
                   6. Visigoths- Spanish
                   7. Saxons - English
                   8. Ostrogoths - Extinct
                   9. Lombards- Italy
                   10. Heruli - Extinct.
                   
...but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. 
                   The iron was Rome and the Roman influence continued into the feet and toes in the form of Roman Catholicism.
v 42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken. 
                   Some European kingdoms are strong, some weak.
                   
                   v 43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry [from a word meaning “damp “or “sticky”] clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men... 
                   
                   The four metals had  represented earthly governments - State powers. The clay represents a  new distinct element - the religious or Church power.
                   
                   UNION OF CHURCH & STATE
                   Evidently “they” who   mingle with the seed of men are not the seed of men. They must therefore  be the “seed,” or children, of God. Here then is foretold the mingling,  or attempted union, of the church with the world. Such a union is as  unnatural as attempting to mix iron & clay, and is destined for  dissolution.
                   
Ezra 9:2 “... the holy  seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the  hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.”
                   
                   
                   
                   ...but they shall not cleave one to another.
                   Royal and common marriages among the nations of Europe have also failed to bring about unity. 
                   A partial unity was  brought about by the uniting of the Roman Catholic Church (the papacy)  and some of the European nations during the Dark Ages, but this  Religious-Political system -  The Holy Roman Empire - did not last. With  the advent of the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century,  protesting the errors & abuses of misdirected Catholicism, Europe  began to withdraw their support from the Vatican. In France, papal  hypocrisy and abuses led to a rejection of all religion, giving rise to  the Atheism of the French Revolution.
                   
                   “All the reigning princes in Europe are closely related.” The Royal Relatives of Europe, World’s Work, Oct. 1914
                   
                   ...even as iron is not mixed with clay.
                   The Roman Empire has been  described as history’s Humpty Dumpty. After Rome’s downfall in 476 AD   “all the king’s horses and all the king’s men (the warriors and  statesmen of fifteen centuries have failed) “couldn’t put Humpty  together again.”
                   Six notable rulers who have tried in vain to defy the prophecy & reunite Europe were:
                   
                   1. Charlemagne (of the Franks) 8th century
                   2. Charles V (of Spain) 16th century
                   3. Louis XIV (of France) 18th century
                   4. Napoleon (of France) 19th century
                   5. Kaiser Wilhelm (Germany) 20th century
                   6. Adolf Hitler (Germany) 20th century
                   
                   The image of chapter 2  exactly parallels the vision of the four beasts in chapter 7.  The  fourth beast of chapter 7 represents the same kingdom as the iron legs  of chapter 2. The ten horns of the beast correspond to the divided feet  and toes of the image. These horns are said to be ten kings which should  arise; and they are just as much independent kingdoms as are the beasts  themselves, for the beasts are spoken of in precisely the same manner;   namely, as “four kings which shall arise.” Dan 7:17.  The ten horns do  not denote a line of successive kings, but kingdoms which exist  contemporaneously; for three of them were plucked up by the little  horn.  The ten horns represent the ten kingdoms into which Rome was  divided, and these horns correspond to the divided feet and toes of Dan  2.
                   
                   v 44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed...
                   Daniel uses the words “king” and “kingdom” interchangeably. 
CHRIST’S KINGDOM SET UP
                   At the time this kingdom  is set up, there will be a plurality of kings existing  contemporaneously.  These kingdoms cannot refer to the four preceding  kingdoms; for it would be absurd to use such language in reference to a  line of successive kings, since it would be in the days of the last king  only, not in the days of any of the preceding, that the kingdom of God  would be set up.
                   The Kingdom of God was  set up after the stone hit the image on the feet. The stone cannot refer  to Christ’s first advent, because when Christ came Rome was one united  superpower, whereas the stone hit the image upon the feet AFTER Rome had  divided into the feet and toes of iron and clay (the 10 nations of  Europe AD476.
                   Christ is the stone which  will pulverize the image. Speaking of Himself, Christ said, “And  whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it  shall fall, it will grind him to powder.” Matt 21:44
                   
                   The reigns of the various kingdoms get longer and longer:
                   Babylon605 - 539
                   Medo-Persia539 - 331
                   Greece331 - 169
                   Rome (pagan & papal)169 - the Second Coming
                   Christ’s Kingdom        Second Coming to eternity!
                   
                   ...and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms...  
                   At Christ’s coming the  nations are not to be converted, but destroyed (Rev 19:11-21). Those  “filthy” when Jesus comes are forever lost. (Rev 22:11-12) 
                   
                   ...and it shall stand for ever.
                   
                   v 45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone [compare with Matt 21:44] was cut out of the mountain without hands... 
                   “Without hands” means by Divine power. See Heb 9:11, 24;  2 Cor 5:1; Col 2:11.
                   Christ’s kingdom is not  to be brought in by human devising. Thus all efforts to establish  Christ’s kingdom by political or military means are misdirected.
                   Mountains represent  kingdoms (see Dan 2:35). The stone is Christ. The mountain from which he  was cut is the great universal kingdom of God.
                   
                   ...and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold... 
                   God sees past kingdoms as still present: 
                   (1) Though the earlier  nations represented by the metallic sections had their dominions taken  away, yet in a certain sense they live on and will be fully destroyed  when the stone strikes.
                   (2) The end-time beast of  Rev 13 is made up of the previous beasts (nations) of Dan 7. This shows  that though the previous nations lost their dominion, yet in a sense  they still exist, amalgamated in the beast. 
                   (3) Of the first three  beasts in Dan 7 we read, “they had their dominion taken away: yet their  lives were prolonged for a season and time.” Dan 7:12. The fourth beast  itself exists till its destruction after the judgment.
                   God clearly sees all  previous powers as still living even though their dominions have been  taken away. Thus their complete destruction is to occur at the  brightness of Christ’s Second Coming. (2 Thess 2:8)
                   
                   ...the  great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass  hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof  sure. 
                   The fact that Daniel could tell the king his dream, confirmed to the king that the interpretation was also correct.
Thus far, the reformers, in their study of prophecy, had good reason to believe the RCC was the Antichrist, however, when prophecy is being used as in this case to identify someone or thing, it must meet the requirements or criteria of every single aspect of the prophecy. So far the RCC fits the bill of 2 Thess. and Daniel 2. Will it continue to pass the test? Daniel 7 next.