Let's me remind everyone that Rhema is Catholic
"Let's" ???
Let me remind everyone that MB seems to not have a good grasp of language and likely has reading comprehension difficulties in that -
I am NOT a Catholic.
Shall I remind everyone that you're a JW ??
There is no record of everything Jesus said
But there IS a record of things he
did say. It seems that you would like to toss all that into the rubbish bin, and then invent things about Jesus from this non-existent record.
most of them think they are the Right ones in Christianity with "Faith and works" being what they believe.
I am glad, though, to see that you think the author of James was not "Right."
Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
- James 2:18, 21-22, 24 KJV
Or do you wish to erase the book of James from the bible like Martin Luther wanted?
It's astonishing just how humans will fight tooth and nail to the death for their religious fantasies.
Still have been given this "list of works by any Catholic.
I translated those but you did not.
Sorry, this word salad makes no sense. I would encourage you to try again.
Pneuma is a Greek word that in English means "spirit, breath, or unseen force". Which is it Rhema?
I'll let you figure that out.
LINK to the Liddell Scott for G4151 πνεῦμα Pneuma
A. blast, wind
Maybe
A. II. 3. flatulence
But you know I'm not Trinitarian. (So how the crap did you come up with the
flatulence claiming that I'm Catholic?)
The next verse shows "the Holy Spirit, Breathe of God, or Spirit of God."
What next verse? There is no John 16:34. (And verse 33 is the only verse in my post.)
You
really might want to put on your thinking cap when you post. It would benefit us both. I remember a long time ago in a forum far far away, a member would get drunk and then post (he was mean drunk). It was almost funny.
If that's a stab that I don't have common sense, your opinon I don't is just your opinion not a fact.
It wasn't (a stab at you), but this post of yours sure dispels any doubt.
And it does lack common sense to say that Jesus spoke on topics for which there is no written account.
How would you know? Since there's no record of such. Did Jesus speak on tariffs? The internal combustion engine? Oreo cookies? Perhaps you think Jesus invented the chair like Mel Gibson does? But hey, we can just claim that Jesus spoke on any topic if we toss out the written accounts. Let me know what Jesus said about DNA.
Point is, in any language words do not exist as a direct translation so other words are used and even more words in fact. That's in learning the basics of any non-English to English translation.
Dear Lord, now
YOU'RE a translation expert. And I've changed my mind. I would never want you to ever work on me as a medic.
In every language words exist that
are a direct translation. (Mother, sky, water, comes to mind.) But am I to assume that you meant to write, "Point is, in any language there MAYBE BE SOME words where a direct translation does not exist." Let's go with that. So what's your point? Your list is still composed mostly of theological terms invented by man that do not exist (whether as a direct translation or not) in the Greek manuscripts. But by all means, Dr. MB, prove me wrong. (It would be a breath of fresh air after this pneuma.)
“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (
John 14:6b). No good deeds, no chants, no sacrifices are enough. Only the blood of Jesus has the power to wash away someone’s sins forever.
How, given any possible definition of common sense, can one get "blood of Jesus has the power to wash away someone's sins forever" out of "I am the way, and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." ??? UNLESS you add words to say "No one comes to the Father except through my blood." (But that's NOT what is written.)
Jesus
IS his Teaching (LOGOS means teachings)
LINK to the Liddell Scott Lexicon for LOGOS
III. 2. my teaching,
And His teachings are the way. His teachings are the truth. His teachings gives life, and no other way will get you to the Father, especially when one changes the words OR looks to the words written by other people.
It's truly a mental illness for a person to say, Jesus is my saviour, or Jesus is my Messiah, and yet claim to have no need whatsoever to obey his teachings. How is that anywhere near common sense?
Most importantly, "take up the cross, and follow me."
Truly, stupidity is the god of this world. Can you possibly (fingers crossed) think through this one with me? When Jesus (supposedly) said "
take up the cross, and follow me," what did the CROSS mean to his fellow Jew? What was the CROSS? What was the CROSS used for? It was an instrument of capital punishment used by the Roman Empire to execute rebels -
insurrectionists. There are records of crucifixion dating back to 479 BC in Greece. The Jewish king
Alexander Jannaeus, king of Judea from 103 to 76 BC, crucified 800 rebels, said to be Pharisees, in the middle of Jerusalem (citations upon request).
When any Jew heard "take up your cross" it likely meant "Join the rebellion (follow me)." This isn't a translation issue, but one of informed interpretation - a wisdom that takes into account both history and General Semantics. Was the rebellion against Rome? Or was the rebellion against the Jewish
Sanhedrin? (Likely both, to be honest.) Pilate didn't put "KING of the Jews" on the cross of Jesus for shucks and giggles.
Now what
IS a translation issue, is that you read Jesus was crucified with two thieves. Yet G2812
κλέπτης kleptēs means thief, not G3027
λῃστης lēstēs. G3027 is best translated as "brigand" (cf. Cambridge Greek Lexicon) or INSURRECTIONIST - Rebel. Jesus was indeed crucified between two insurrectionists who tried to overthrow Rome. That's what crucifixion was for.
But was Jesus an insurrectionist? And NOW we're back to a translation issue.
αρατω (G142 ???) τον (
THE)
σταυρον (
CROSS)
αυτου (
OF HIM)
και (
AND)
ακολουθειτω (
FOLLOW)
μοι (
ME)
I Provide a
LINK to the Liddell Scott Lexicon for G142 αἴρω
A. III. lift and take away, remove
One might just as easily read, "REMOVE your cross and follow me," to mean STOP your rebellion against Rome and obey
my teachings.
Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
- Matthew 11:29-30 KJV
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
- Matthew 5:44 KJV
If you continue to listen to the traditions of your religion, you will never understand.
Look at what Jesus DID and along with the Ten strive to do what He did.
(I think you mean the Eleven.. cf. Mat. 28:16 and Acts 1:26)
But I have no problem with your encouragement to DO what Jesus said.
And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?
- Luke 6:46 KJV
Especially to repent and ask the Father for the Forgiveness of Sin.
And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us.
- Luke 11:4 KJV
Secular it may be the "Pilate's Letter to Cesear"
So we are to believe a forgery. (Utterly Amazing.) But "secular"? No. It's Catholic. (And here you call me Catholic when it's
you who cite their documents.)
A complete set of documents from the Fathers of the Church: saintly writers of the early centuries whom the Church recognizes as her special witnesses of the faith.
www.catholicculture.org
Here Jesus stayed SILENT.
According to Luke. What's your point?
There is no record of everything Jesus said nor ANY person at any time in history who was significant.
Glad to see that you believe Pilate wasn't "significant."
And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor. ... And Jesus stood before the governor: and the governor asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest.
- Matthew 27:2, 11 KJV
And Pilate asked him, Art thou the King of the Jews? And he answering said unto him, Thou sayest it.
- Mark 15:2 KJV
And by John's account, Jesus was downright chatty.
Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
- John 19:10-11 KJV
(And it almost sounds like Jesus was saying that God had the greater sin.)
But since we also have no record of most of what Mary said, maybe the Catholics are right? (That would be the logical outcome of your position - that we can rely on things said about which we have no account or record.)
I'd ask that you re-think your position and try to explain things a bit better.
Thank you,
Rhema