First and the Last
Member
Let me ask this. Can God be divided?The bottom line is that you're rejecting the person of Christ as God, being distinct from the Father and equal with the Father in deity.
Could you comment on that?
Let me ask this. Can God be divided?The bottom line is that you're rejecting the person of Christ as God, being distinct from the Father and equal with the Father in deity.
Could you comment on that?
Let me ask this. Can God be divided?
The Father and the Son are most certainly divided in person, but not in deity.
The Son is sitting right now at the right hand of the Father, two distinct persons.
When we read that "the Son is sitting at the right hand of the Father," it signifies a position of authority and honor rather than spatial separation or distinct personhood. This metaphorical language emphasizes the exalted status of Jesus Christ following His earthly ministry, where He reigns in glory and power as God manifested in the flesh.The Father and the Son are most certainly divided in person, but not in deity.
The Son is sitting right now at the right hand of the Father, two distinct persons.
When we read that "the Son is sitting at the right hand of the Father," it signifies a position of authority and honor rather than spatial separation or distinct personhood. This metaphorical language emphasizes the exalted status of Jesus Christ following His earthly ministry, where He reigns in glory and power as God manifested in the flesh.
In Oneness Pentecostal theology, we affirm the full divinity and humanity of Jesus Christ. We believe that Jesus is indeed God incarnate, fully God and fully man. However, we differ from traditional Trinitarian views in our understanding of the nature and manifestation of God.
Firstly, we do not reject the deity of Christ. On the contrary, we uphold that Jesus Christ is the one true God manifested in the flesh. Scriptures such as John 1:1, 14 ("In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us") and Colossians 2:9 ("For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily") affirm that Jesus embodies the fullness of God.
Secondly, the distinction we make is not between separate persons but rather between different manifestations or roles of the one God. We believe that God is one (Deuteronomy 6:4: "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD") and that He has revealed Himself in various ways. As the Father, He is the Creator; as the Son, He is the Redeemer; and as the Holy Spirit, He is the Comforter and Sustainer. These are not separate beings but different ways in which the one God interacts with His creation.
Regarding the equality of Jesus with the Father, we fully agree that Jesus is equal in deity. In John 10:30, Jesus declares, "I and my Father are one," indicating His unity with the Father. This unity is not one of separate persons being united but of the one God's nature being fully present in Jesus Christ. Jesus’ statement in John 14:9, "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father," further supports this understanding.
In conclusion, as a Oneness Pentecostal, I hold firmly to the belief that Jesus is God. We believe that the distinctions made in scripture between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not of separate persons but of the one God manifesting Himself in different ways. This belief maintains the absolute oneness of God while recognizing the full deity and humanity of Jesus Christ.
According to this passage, the Son of God was baptized, the Spirit descended like a dove, and a voice spoke from heaven. Luke 3:22 adds the further information that “the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him.No need to argue it any further. We will never see eye to eye on this. But let me say two things.
First, I respect you as a Brother in Christ, and I'm sorry that we have this disagreement!
Secondly, I can't see the Oneness Theology getting around Matt. 3:16-17, where the distinct three persons of the Triune God are present. But I'm sure they will explain it away without a second thought.
"And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:
And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."
Believe me I also wish there wasn't such a division among us on the nature of God. I think the hardest thing to get past is using "distinct" and "separate", for an indivisible God, when talking about the nature and character of God. Those words alone mean separation.No need to argue it any further. We will never see eye to eye on this. But let me say two things.
First, I respect you as a Brother in Christ, and I'm sorry that we have this disagreement!
Secondly, I can't see the Oneness Theology getting around Matt. 3:16-17, where the distinct three persons of the Triune God are present. But I'm sure they will explain it away without a second thought.
"And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:
And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."
From a theological standpoint, both Old and New Testament writers affirmed monotheism—belief in one God—and consistently emphasized God's unity rather than His plurality of persons. The phrase "the right hand of God" serves as a powerful metaphor to convey God's supreme authority and favor, not to suggest multiple persons within God Himself. The original writers understood and conveyed this symbolism to highlight God's sovereignty and the exalted position of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, without compromising the foundational belief in the oneness and unity of God.
Therefore, while the phrase "the right hand of God" portrays Jesus' exalted status and authority, it does so within the context of monotheism and divine unity, as understood by the original writers of Scripture. It emphasizes God's singular sovereignty and the unique role as Jesus Christ, the Son of God, in God's redemptive plan for humanity.
In ancient cultures, the right hand symbolizes power and honor. So, the "right hand of God" could be understood literally as a place of highest authority next to God. This wouldn't necessarily imply a separate person, but rather an emphasis on God's power. Many scholars believe the phrase is metaphorical. It wouldn't be meant to be taken literally, but as a way to describe God's power, favor, and authority.
According to this passage, the Son of God was baptized, the Spirit descended like a dove, and a voice spoke from heaven. Luke 3:22 adds the further information that “the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him.
To understand this scene, we must remember that God is omnipresent. Jesus is God and was God manifested in flesh while on earth. He could not and did not sacrifice His omnipresence while on earth because that is one of God’s basic attributes, and God does not change. Of course, the physical body of Jesus was not omnipresent, but His Full Deity was. Furthermore, although the fullness of God’s character was resident in the body of Jesus, the omnipresent Spirit of Jesus could not be so confined. Thus, Jesus could be on earth and in heaven at the same time (John 3:13) and with two or three of His disciples at any time (Matthew 18:20).
With the omnipresence of God in mind we can understand the baptism of Christ very easily. It was not at all difficult for God to speak from heaven and to send a manifestation of His Spirit in the form of a dove even while His human body was in the Jordan River. The voice and the dove do not represent different persons any more than the voice of God from Sinai indicates that the mountain was a second intelligent person in the Godhead.
Jesus was baptized as a means of manifesting Himself, or making Himself known, to Israel (John 1:26-27, 31). In other words, Jesus used the baptism as the starting point in His ministry. It was a public declaration of who He was and what He came to do. For example, at Christ’s baptism, John the Baptist learned who Jesus was. He did not know that Jesus really was the Messiah until the baptism, and after the baptism he was able to declare to the people that Jesus was the Son of God and the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29-34).
John 1:32-34 clearly states that the dove was a sign for the benefit of John the Baptist. Since John was the forerunner of Jehovah (Isaiah 40:3), he needed to know that Jesus was really Jehovah come in flesh. God had told John that the One who would baptize with the Holy Ghost would be identified by the Spirit descending upon Him. Of course, John was incapable of seeing the Spirit of God anointing Christ, so God chose a dove as the visible sign of His Spirit. Thus the dove was a special sign for John to let him know that Jesus was Jehovah and the Messiah.
Since Jesus was God Himself and a sinless man, an anointing by a sinful human and anointing with symbolic oil was not enough. Instead, Jesus was anointed directly by the Spirit of God. Thus, at His baptism in water, Jesus was officially anointed for the beginning of His earthly ministry, not by symbolic oil but by the Spirit of God in the form of a dove.
The baptism of Jesus does not teach us that God is three persons but only reveals the omnipresence of God and the humanity of the Son of God. When God speaks to four different people on four different continents at the same time, we do not think of four persons of God but of God’s omnipresence. God did not intend for the baptism to reveal to the monotheistic Jewish onlookers a radically new revelation of a plurality in the Godhead, and there is no indication that the Jews interpreted it as such. Even many modern scholars do not see the baptism of Christ as an indication of a trinity but as a reference to “the authoritative anointing of Jesus as the Messiah.”
Believe me I also wish there wasn't such a division among us on the nature of God. I think the hardest thing to get past is using "distinct" and "separate", for an indivisible God, when talking about the nature and character of God. Those words alone mean separation.
The "independence of action" refers to how God can operate in these various roles simultaneously or separately while maintaining the same character, nature, and essence of deity. For instance, God as the Father is the Creator and Sustainer, God as the Son is the Redeemer who lived among us in human form, and God as the Holy Spirit is the Comforter who indwells and guides believers. Despite these differing roles, there is no division in God's essence or being; it is the same God acting in different capacities. I believe that, so really where are our differences?I call it independence of action in the same character, nature, and essence of deity.
The "independence of action" refers to how God can operate in these various roles simultaneously or separately while maintaining the same character, nature, and essence of deity. For instance, God as the Father is the Creator and Sustainer, God as the Son is the Redeemer who lived among us in human form, and God as the Holy Spirit is the Comforter who indwells and guides believers. Despite these differing roles, there is no division in God's essence or being; it is the same God acting in different capacities. I believe that, so really where are our differences?
I perfectly agree with that assessment.Well, I was speaking of independence in the example of Matt. 3:16-17 where all three are in action separately, at the same time but for one common cause.
I perfectly agree with that assessment.
"The concept of 'independence of action' refers to how the one God, maintaining the same character, nature, and essence, can operate in various roles either simultaneously or separately. For example, at Jesus' baptism as recorded in Matthew 3:16-17, we see the Father speaking from heaven, the Son being baptized, and the Holy Spirit descending like a dove. This demonstrates that God can perform distinct actions in these roles at the same time, all working together for a common purpose. Despite these differing roles and simultaneous actions, there is no division in God's essence or being; it is the same God acting in different capacities to fulfill His divine will.
If only we (which is very difficult at times) would examine Scripture and let it interpret itself aside from denominational and philosophical thought and private interpretation. Then we can better understand the nature of God. I try my best to list most prominent Scriptures but when I give my interpretation is derived from all scriptures on the subject.Our difference is that when you use the word "God" you are speaking of one entity performing the actions.
I'm referring to "God" as three distinct persons performing the actions independent of one another. These three distinct persons are One God.
I can't go along with one entity at action in three roles. That is out of the question for the majority.
Jesus Christ is understood as God manifest in the flesh, fully divine and fully human. This we agree on.
What we apparently don't agree on is I believe that God is Indivisible and inseparably one. Which I don't know why in light of these Scriptures.
Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD."
Isaiah 44:6 "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God."
Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me."
Isaiah 45:21-22 "Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me. Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is none else."
Deuteronomy 4:35 "Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that the LORD he is God; there is none else beside him."
Deuteronomy 32:39 "See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
1 Kings 8:60 "That all the people of the earth may know that the LORD is God, and that there is none else."
2 Samuel 7:22 "Wherefore thou art great, O LORD God: for there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears."
1 Chronicles 17:20 "O LORD, there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears."
Mark 12:29 "And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord."
Mark 12:32 "And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he."
John 17:3 "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."
Romans 3:30 "Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith."
1 Corinthians 8:4 "As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one."
1 Corinthians 8:6 "But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him."
Galatians 3:20 "Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one."
Ephesians 4:6 "One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all."
1 Timothy 2:5 "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus."
James 2:19 "Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble."
I affirm that Jesus Christ was truly human, with all the essential components of humanity, including a human soul. I don't deny Christ's humanity but rather emphasize that the one God manifested Himself in human form.
The divine and human natures are united in the person of Jesus Christ without confusion or separation. This includes Jesus having a human soul.
I don't reduce Jesus to merely a divine appearance but recognizes Him as fully experiencing human life, including possessing a human soul. So the "empty shell" comment is not applicable because Jesus is fully divine and fully human, with both natures coexisting in His person.
Bible teaches that Jesus Christ was truly human, possessing all essential components of humanity, including a human soul. He experienced human emotions, needs, and limitations, which are indicative of a complete human existence.
The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.
But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and to keep back for yourself part of the proceeds of the land? While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? Why is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to man but to God.”
Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.If only we (which is very difficult at times) would examine Scripture and let it interpret itself aside from denominational and philosophical thought and private interpretation. Then we can better understand the nature of God. I try my best to list most prominent Scriptures but when I give my interpretation is derived from all scriptures on the subject.
Both our perspectives are deeply rooted in scripture and seek to honor the mystery of Christ's incarnation, but we approach it from different theological frameworks. Bridging this divide requires mutual respect, careful study of scripture, and a willingness to engage in dialogue that acknowledges the complexity of these doctrinal differences while seeking unity in essential Christian beliefs. Ultimately, we both affirm the centrality of Jesus Christ and His Full Divinity in the faith and share a common commitment to proclaiming Him as Lord and Savior, despite our theological distinctions.
pretty much if we flip our terminology when I say manifestations or roles and you say persons we are saying the same thing. If I said persons instead of manifestations I don't believe there would be a debate. I believe the Three manifestations can exist simultaneously and at the same time, because God is Omnipresent.The way I see it, if we are trusting in the finished work of Christ for our salvation and not our own work, we are doing well.
The interpretation of Scripture is very important, but not nearly as important as finding our salvation in Christ.
You can get all the doctrines wrong, but if you get Jesus Christ right, you're going to make it into His Kingdom.
pretty much if we flip our terminology when I say manifestations or roles and you say persons we are saying the same thing. If I said persons instead of manifestations I don't believe there would be a debate. I believe the Three manifestations can exist simultaneously and at the same time, because God is Omnipresent.
I believe the Three manifestations (In biblical terms, "manifestations" refer to the visible or perceptible ways in which God reveals Himself to humanity. These manifestations can take various forms, including physical appearances, divine actions, or direct communications that make God's presence and attributes known to people (Jesus Christ being the ultimate visible expression of God). Throughout the Bible, God manifests Himself in different ways to interact with His creation, convey His will, and demonstrate His power and glory.) can exist simultaneously and at the same time, because God is Omnipresent.But yet we are so far apart. The Scripture definitely speaks of Oneness, but also speaks of distinct persons.
I believe the Three manifestations (In biblical terms, "manifestations" refer to the visible or perceptible ways in which God reveals Himself to humanity. These manifestations can take various forms, including physical appearances, divine actions, or direct communications that make God's presence and attributes known to people (Jesus Christ being the ultimate visible expression of God). Throughout the Bible, God manifests Himself in different ways to interact with His creation, convey His will, and demonstrate His power and glory.) can exist simultaneously and at the same time, because God is Omnipresent.
Now I ask is anything wrong with what is written here?