Calvinism - HyperCalvinism - TULIP : Simplified

[th1bill]

What are you talking about?

Peter says God is impartial in Acts 10:34. The U and L in TULIP says He is not.



No case?

Explain to me either:

A. How the U and L in TULIP do not support Partiality, or

B. How partiality by a God creator does not make Him pure evil.

-----------------------

I am going to get some popcorn as like @Foghorn @Dylan569 and @Brightfame52 I expect you to either do a dance for me, run away or perform a slight of hand magic trick. I have yet to see a Calvinist or a supporter of theirs take a stab at these questions.

This is your dance and I have no idea what Tulip means other than a flower, let alone why you find it scripturally incorrect. I do not worship, nor do I live by the words of any mortal man, I base my life on scripture and you are avoiding the scriptural proofing with smart-elick answers of zero substance as if you are the king and I am just another surf.

 

[KingJ]

This is your dance and I have no idea what Tulip means other than a flower, let alone why you find it scripturally incorrect. I do not worship, nor do I live by the words of any mortal man, I base my life on scripture and you are avoiding the scriptural proofing with smart-elick answers of zero substance as if you are the king and I am just another surf.

Bill, I know you mean well and are a good person. But you cannot take part in this discussion if you do not know what TULIP is.

 

[th1bill]

Bill, I know you mean well and are a good person. But you cannot take part in this discussion if you do not know what TULIP is.

Actually, when you did not respond I looked it up. Now, to begin with, I am not God's supervisor or His judge. My Scriptura task is:

Matthew 18​

The Greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven​

18 At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?”


2He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. 3And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 4Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. (Thanks to the Bible Gateway)

Having been taught by Ruah, I understand that Yehovah created this Time/Space Continuum for our benefit and understanding that better comes from better than 34 years of study and prayer.

Yehovah existed before He created this place for our proving ourselves and although I have little to relate it to, it is my understanding of Ruah's teaching (Isaiah 46:10) that Yehovah knew, some 6,000 years or better, before I was born that I would curse Him for the first 21 years, seek to find Him for the following 24 and would serve His Holy Being the rest of my life. On the basis of that foreknowledge, He wrote my name in the Book of Life, a.k.a. He chose me.

To call Calvin a Racist is a racist act IMO.

 

[KingJ]

To call Calvin a Racist is a racist act IMO.

How so?

Are you going to be the first person on this site to explain how Calvinism does not push partiality by God?

Explain to me either:

A. How the U and L in TULIP do not support Partiality, or

B. How partiality by a God creator does not make Him pure evil.

------------------

Please don't make an accusation if you cannot support it. I have supported mine. And done so thoroughly!

 

[KingJ]

Yehovah existed before He created this place for our proving ourselves

According to Calvinism this is an incorrect statement. There is no 'proving' ourselves.

and although I have little to relate it to, it is my understanding of Ruah's teaching (Isaiah 46:10) that Yehovah knew, some 6,000 years or better, before I was born that I would curse Him for the first 21 years, seek to find Him for the following 24 and would serve His Holy Being the rest of my life. On the basis of that foreknowledge, He wrote my name in the Book of Life, a.k.a. He chose me.

As I have said before, Calvinism sounds all nice and rosy when YOU are the chosen one.

I don't want to go off track too much, there is so much I could say on this. Let's stay focused, explain the questions above please.

--------------------------

I mean the following statement in the nicest way possible, you, @Brightfame52 @Dylan569 and @Foghorn are coming across like little chihuahua's that yap at a persons ankles when they turn around. You do not face an important question and deal with it.

Please, for the love of God, DEAL with the two questions I have asked. I wish I was a mod. I would instantly ban someone who does not answer a very important question when they are asked it so many times.

Teaching that God is partial, INCRIMINATES God.

 

[Fragrant Grace]

Please note that Talk Jesus does not follow the deception of Calvinism.