Catholics Vs Protestants: Who is Right? 11-2-24

[Rhema]

That's really odd you would offer me Ad Hominem response.

It's really odd that you would think my reply was ad hominem.

 

[Brad Huber]

Bashing is one thing and largely insults and opinions.
Pointing out all they do that IS wrong and is NOT backed by God and the Bible is not hate.

And I would point out that you dont speak for God. You can interpret scripture however you want, and go solo scripture all the way, but you are not God's press secretary.

 

[Garee]

Understood.

In Metaphysics Heel is the root chakra. It's one of three chakras of the lower self. It is hell. Each Chakra is an energy center that governs a part of the human body.

If one doesn't raise the Kundalini (the Christ Oil), then one remains in Hell, as opposed to going to the crown Chakra or heaven. No man comes to the father but by me. The father being God in heaven. Heaven is in your head where the temple is. Jesus is the Christ Oil.

Each month the moon, moves into a position of the zodiac which you are born. Your pineal gland releases a fluid. The fluid is the Christ Oil. It travels down your spine. Jesus lived and ministered for 33 years. You have 33 vertebrae in your spine. Jesus is killed on the cross. He is buried in a cave for three days. The Christ Oil which travels down in your spine rests in the Sacrum Chakra for three days.

During that three days you have one of three options: 1) You can use the Christ Oil and regenerate 2) You can use the Christ Oil and generate or 3) The worse option you can waste it.

I'm going to simplify this for brevity, but preparation is required. The meditation isn't to be taken lightly. If you regenerate, you meditate. During meditation, the Christ Oil goes back up the spine. Jesus resurrects. The Christ Oil returns back to the pineal gland. Once there, the fluid transmutes into a gas which then regenerates your brain and body. Your brain is now at 100% instead of 10%. Your body is renewed. You are reborn. When you accept Christ as your personal savior then you are reborn. This is what the Catholic Church teaches you to take literally when really, it's an allegory. They encoded the bible. The encoding is the allegory. They wrote the Bible barrowing from Druidism.

You are taught to read it literally so that you never acquire your higher self-consciousness keeping you in the lower self-conscious where eventually you die, and your soul recycles. The Catholic Church isn't going to teach you the meditation, but rather talk about it in an allegory, and again where you take it literally that a man was born from a virgin, lived 33 years, ministered, died on a cross, went to hell, defeated death, resurrected and then ascended.

If you generate then you are procreating. The procreation fluids of the male and female is life. You are taking life from you and your spouse is taking life from him or her, putting it together, so that a new soul enters life from the both of you. Each time procreation fluids are excreted then your lifespan is shortened. Once you are out, that's it, you die. What this mean is, each time you excrete procreation fluids, the Christ Oil is exhausted. You had the opportunity to regenerate but didn't. Regeneration renews, you are reborn. Your lifespan increases. This makes procreation unique and special. It creates value. Pleasure is no longer the motivation for procreation, but rather byproduct of procreation. The motivation for procreation is new life. Realizing this creates a new mindset about when to procreate and why you and your spouse decide to do so.

You can waste your Christ Oil. You can spoil it by remaining in the lower self, by eating acidic foods, drinking alcohol, abusing your procreation fluids, using tobacco, marijuana, other drugs, no meditation and no balanced Chakras.

Revisiting sin...
Using fornication as an example. Fornication isn't really sin, but fornicating keeps you in the lower self, the lower three Chakras. If you stay in the lower self never meditating to the higher self, then you remain in hell. You die. Your soul recycles. On the other hand, if you balance between the lower self and the higher self managing your behavior, you can live as long as you desire on earth. At the center is the zero point of inertia where at this frequency you don't age and you don't ascend.

Sin is the sinewave. Your life is sinewave cycle. Think of a guitar string. You strum one string. It makes a sound. The sound is sinewave. When you are born, the wave is strong. The Catholic Church teaches you, you are born into sin. That's allegory for the sinewave. When you die the wave has faded. The strum on the string has faded. Everything is cycle. In the flesh or light manifested into matter the cycle comes to end.

Energy cannot be destroyed. That's your soul. Your body or matter reconverts back into energy or light upon death. Your soul recycles. Again, this is the sinewave. The cycle never ends due to the toroidal field's electromagnetism. The Vatican knows all this. They got it from the Druids. They just don't teach it to you explicitly. They encode it the Bible they wrote in allegories. The truth is hidden in plain sight.

Sola scriptura, all things written in the law and prophets is the final authority in matters of Christ's faith (power) Nothing can be added to or taken away

The Vatican hates that reforming authority

 

[Rhema]

Nothing can be added to or taken away

Then who took away those books from the King James Bible in the late 1800's?

Sola scriptura,

And need I ask who used this phrase as a foundational belief of the Reformation in the 1500's? And when he established this doctrine, just how many books were in his Bible?

(I hope I don't regret asking...)

Kindly,
Rhema

 

[Rhema]

but you are not God's press secretary.

Mr. Huber, if I may ask, ... What does the principle of the Universal Priesthood of all believers then mean to you?

Kindly,
Rhema

(Because you certainly put yourself forward as God's press secretary in a PM to me...)

 

[backNforth]

Then who took away those books from the King James Bible in the late 1800's?

That Apocrypha deflection is a non sequitur, as all pure Bibles viewed these books as non-canonical and said so in their preface.

The Vatican hates that reforming authority

Indeed. Since Catholic bibles include the Apocrypha as scripture, it becomes vital that Bibles no longer include it, even as history.

 

[Rhema]

all pure Bibles viewed these books as non-canonical and said so in their preface.

Obviously you just couldn't let Garee answer for himself.

If you had, you wouldn't need to clean the egg off your face as the Introduction to the King James 1611 says NOTHING about certain books being non-canonical.

Here, why don't you take the time and actually read the Introduction for yourself? It's quite illuminating.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/1611-King-James-Bible-Introduction.php

Of course if you don't trust the scribal text above, please feel free to peruse the photostat before admitting that you've ... blundered.

The Original King James Bible 1611 PDF

www.originalbibles.com

Kindly
Rhema

 

[Brad Huber]

Mr. Huber, if I may ask, ... What does the principle of the Universal Priesthood of all believers then mean to you?

Kindly,
Rhema

(Because you certainly put yourself forward as God's press secretary in a PM to me...)

I am not God's press secretary. And I never said I was. I simply told someone else that they werent. But I can tell you that the Holy Spirit has confirmed to me in mulitple situations... Intellectual christians (and I would include you in this) have a much harder time with faith, and its their loss, for God loves those who have faith and listen to the urgings of the Holy Spirit more so than those who believe they always rightly divide the word of God (as if dividing the word of God was a good thing).

Kindly spoken even though you are not likely to believe it.

 

[Rhema]

I am not God's press secretary. And I never said I was.

No, you never said that. You simply acted that way.

I simply told someone else that they werent.

This is the classic log and speck parable. You may wish to reconsider. (Kindly spoken even though you are not likely to believe it.)

But I can tell you that the Holy Spirit has confirmed to me in mulitple situations...

For which you then act as press secretary. (See my point?)

Intellectual christians (and I would include you in this) have a much harder time with faith

You have no idea who I am or what the Lord has wrought in my life. If you DID have this "Holy Spirit" access to God, then maybe He would tell you exactly who I am. But you don't. Though you think you do.

Intellectual christians (and I would include you in this) have a much harder time with faith,

Non-intellectual Christians are more easily swayed by Satan into believing they have some special divine insight when really, they don't. Their own ignorance deludes them. This is the exact reason that the JW's eject intelligent people from their midst. Pentecostals and Charismatics (to the despair of God) do the same thing.

God loves those who have faith and listen to the urgings of the Holy Spirit

And your "Intellectual Christian" can far better discern the actual voice of the Holy Spirit from imaginative "urgings."

more so than those who believe they always rightly divide the word of God (as if dividing the word of God was a good thing).

You use a Shibboleth without adequate comprehension. (Which kind of proves my point.)

Rhema

 

[B-A-C]

And your "Intellectual Christian" can far better discern the actual voice of the Holy Spirit from imaginative "urgings."

Job 5:13 "He captures the wise by their own shrewdness, And the advice of the cunning is quickly thwarted.
Prov 3:7 Do not be wise in your own eyes; Fear the LORD and turn away from evil.
Prov 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, But a wise man is he who listens to counsel.
Prov 26:12 Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.
Prov 28:11 The rich man is wise in his own eyes, But the poor who has understanding sees through him.
Isa 5:21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes And clever in their own sight!
Rom 12:16 Be of the same mind toward one another; do not be haughty in mind, but associate with the lowly. Do not be wise in your own estimation.

1Cor 1:20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?
1Cor 1:21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
1Cor 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, "He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS";

 

[Rhema]

Job 5:13 "He captures the wise by their own shrewdness, And the advice of the cunning is quickly thwarted.
Prov 3:7 Do not be wise in your own eyes; Fear the LORD and turn away from evil.
Prov 12:15 The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, But a wise man is he who listens to counsel.
Prov 26:12 Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.
Prov 28:11 The rich man is wise in his own eyes, But the poor who has understanding sees through him.
Isa 5:21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes And clever in their own sight!
Rom 12:16 Be of the same mind toward one another; do not be haughty in mind, but associate with the lowly. Do not be wise in your own estimation.

1Cor 1:20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?
1Cor 1:21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
1Cor 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, "He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS";

Exactly. Satan loves when scripture is interpreted this way. Weaponized to be used against anyone having a smattering of education and reason. (Does it make you feel better to put others down?)

 

[backNforth]

The Original King James Bible 1611

LOL @ "the original" KJB 1611.

...the King James 1611 says NOTHING about certain books being non-canonical.

Yet another non sequitur from Rhema who's still sippin' that bitter tea.

Unlike pure early English Bibles, such as the KJV, 1611, which separated the Apocrypha from the Bible, the corrupt Catholic bibles (e.g. New Jerusalem Bible) and their manuscripts (e.g. Vaticanus from which the TNIV, ESV, HCSB NIV, and NASB are translated) intersperse these corrupt books among those of the Bible.

Here, why don't you take the time and actually read the Introduction for yourself? It's quite illuminating.

The Wycliffe Bible warned in its Prologue that only those books written in Hebrew were canonical. Others, it said,

“...shall be set among Apocrypha, that is, without authority of belief...[that] be not of the authority of bible ancient Hebrew...

[R]eceiveth not them among holy Scripture...that be not ancient Hebrew and be not of the number of holy writ;

[T]hey aught to be cast far away...for me doubteth the truth thereof” (Prologue, pp. 1, 2).

Wycliffe said that when the “Word of God is not heard, spiritual death broods over all” (Schaff-Herzog, s.v. Wyclif, pp. 464, 466).

“[H]e designated the Bible as the one authority for believers, and so teaching, traditions, bulls, symbols, and censures go by the board as far as they do not rest on Scripture.”

Tyndale and Coverdale did not approve of the Apocrypha. King James, himself did not approve of it.

Tyndale would not translate the Apocrypha. Coverdale removed the Apocrypha from the Old Testament scriptures. He prefaced his intertestamental section saying, these books “are not reckoned to be of like authority with the other books of the Bible neither are they found in the Canon of the Hebrew...[and] are not judged among the doctors to be of like reputation with the other scripture...And the chief cause thereof is this: there be many places in them, that seem to be repugnant unto the open and manifest truth in the other books of the Bible” (Dore, 2nd ed., p. 110).

Rogers’ Thomas Matthew’s Bible said, “the books called Apocrypha...are not found in the Hebrew nor in the Chaldee” (Dore, 2nd ed., p. 116).

Samuel Ward was among a few who were assigned the task of translating the Apocrypha. King James I said:

“As to the Apocryphal books, I omit them because I am no papist.” (Basilikon Doron ).

Most Christians shared the King’s desire for a Bible without the bulky Apocrypha. As early as 1612 printers (London: Barker), anxious to supply the large demand, printed Bibles without the appendage of the unnecessary Apocrypha. They were following the pattern of the quarto edition of the Great Bible (ed. 1549), some copies of the 1599 Geneva, a quarto edition of the Bishops’ Bible, dated 1577, and many personal hand-sized earlier Bibles. Antiquarian booksellers today offer for sale numerous early copies of the KJV without the Apocrypha (e.g. 1612, 1629 (Norton and Bill “Printers to the King’s Most Excellent Majesty”), 1637, 1653, 1662, 1682; Peter Cresswell, Antiquarian Bibles, South Humberside, England: Humber Books, Catalogue 23 et al,; TBS, No. 31).

The Apocrypha is a series of books, written between B.C. 250 and B.C. 100, which exemplify the “superstitious” “traditions,” “imaginations,” and “commandments of men” which Jesus and Paul warned against (Acts 17:22, Matt. 15:9, Rom. 1:21, Gal. 1:14). The Apocrypha characterizes the “cultural, ethical, and religious background” which surrounded the time of Christ. Even Princeton’s Bruce Metzger writes:

“This body of literature also supplies important information regarding the life and thoughts of the Jewish people during a significant period of their history, namely the period just prior to the emergence of Christianity. By becoming acquainted with these books, therefore, one will be better able to understand the political, ethical, and religious background of the contemporaries of Jesus Christ” (Bruce Metzger, An Introduction to the Apocrypha, NY: Oxford University Press, 1957, p. viii).

For the same reason, current Study Bibles, like the Scofield Reference Bible (“From Malachi to Matthew”) and Dake’s Annotated Reference Bible (“Between the Testaments”) include a section between the Old Testament and the New Testament, explaining the events, history and beliefs of the intertestamental period. The KJV translators, like early Bibles, simply included the real thing. No one today thinks that Scofield’s notes are a part of the Bible, just as no true Christian in 1611 thought that the Apocrypha was a part of the Bible. Bible Prologues stated ‘up front’ that the Apocrypha was not scripture. The Great Bible’s Prologue stated that the Apocrypha was not “found in the Hebrew” Bible. Wycliffe’s Prologue said that the Apocrypha “is, without authority.” Luther’s Bible (1534 ed.) stated that the Apocrypha is “not to be considered as equal to Holy Scriptures.” The early Westminster Confession of Faith stated that the Apocrypha is “no part of the Canon of Scripture; and therefore are of no authority in the church of God; nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of, than other human writings.” The KJV translators said that the Apocrypha was not scripture because it was not written in Hebrew, nor ever accepted by the Jews or early Christians, nor ever mentioned by Jesus Christ -- because it detailed those “superstitious” “traditions” which Jesus and Paul warned about.

Early Bibles, including the KJV, placed numerous non-Biblical items within the binding of the Bibles for practical reasons. They included things like calendars, genealogies, maps, gazetteers, metrical Psalms for singing, and the Apocrypha (which shed light on just exactly what “superstitions” and “traditions” were being followed by the Jews). Even today Bibles include concordances, dictionaries, notes, histories, commentaries, and cross references. No one mistakes these for being equal to the scriptures. In 1611 and before, few people had a collection of books, most owned only one book, the Bible. Binding other materials within it served a practical need. Even today it is less expensive to print and purchase one book of 1200 pages, than two books each having 600 pages.

Unlike pure early English Bibles, such as the KJV, 1611, which separated the Apocrypha from the Bible, the corrupt Catholic bibles (e.g. New Jerusalem Bible) and their manuscripts (e.g. Vaticanus from which the TNIV, ESV, HCSB NIV, and NASB are translated) intersperse these corrupt books among those of the Bible. Rather than including them as a warning of exactly what “commandments of men” Jesus was warning about, these corrupt versions placed Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees after the book of Nehemiah; they placed Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus following the Song of Solomon and Baruch following Lamentations. The Song of Azariah, Susanna, and Bel and the Dragon are included in the book of Daniel. Why? The Catholic church has adopted the “traditions of men” expounded in these books. Some of the heresies included in these books include the following taken from the New Jerusalem Bible:

1.) “[A]lmsgiving expiates sins” and “almsgiving saves from death and purges every kind of sin” (Ecclesiasticus 3:30, Tobit 12:9).

2.) Purgatory, and prayers for the dead (2 Maccabees 12:39-45).

3.) “[T]orments and the rack...irons” for the “disobedient” (Ecclesiasticus 33:24-29).

4.) The immaculate conception of Mary; reincarnation and transmigration of souls for New Agers and Hindus (Wisdom 8:19, 20).

5.) Monism and pantheism. “For your imperishable spirit is in everything!” (Wisdom 12:1). Even new versions changes, like the NKJV’s “God is spirit” (John 4:24) echo the New Age concept that god is in “everything.”

Again, since Catholic bibles include the Apocrypha as scripture, it becomes vital that Bibles no longer include it, even as history.

 

[Rhema]

Yet another non sequitur from Rhema who's still sippin' that bitter tea.

You may wish to look up the term non sequitur. And then use it correctly.

But, I shouldn't expect much from a pure internet troll and Google scholar.

The Wycliffe Bible warned in its Prologue that only those books written in Hebrew were canonical. Others, it said,

Then why did Wycliffe write "The first book of Maccabees was found written in Hebrew," (LINK)

be not of the authority of bible ancient Hebrew...

That's not in the text. (See LINK above.)

King James I said: “As to the Apocryphal books, I omit them because I am no papist.” (Basilikon Doron ).

Well it certainly didn't keep his son from having his head chopped off by those elitist Puritans, eh?

Hmm... it would seem that God has better things for me to do at this point.

 

[backNforth]

Yet another unsavory Nothing Burger from Rhema.

Hmm... it would seem that God has better things for me to do at this point.

He does; but continuing to sip that bitter tea is not one of them.

 

[Garee]

Then who took away those books from the King James Bible in the late 1800's?


And need I ask who used this phrase as a foundational belief of the Reformation in the 1500's? And when he established this doctrine, just how many books were in his Bible?

(I hope I don't regret asking...)

Kindly,
Rhema

Hi thanks

Catholiscim as a law of the fathers. . oral traditions of dying mankind . They make claim of the cannon assemblers. By puffing up there dying fathers above all things written in law and prophets (sola scriptura)

Every word of Christ is inspired by Him all of cannon is inspired of Christ, the one cannon assembler.

1 Corinthians 4 6-7And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.;For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?

Same ones that puffed themselves up as the supposed cannon assemblers

The reason for the first century reformation false prophets showing thier hatred for sola scriptura .

Paul went from murderer Acts chapter 22 to preacher of sola scriptura Acts 24

Acts 24:13-14 Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.; But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

Rather than worshiping the unseen eternal Holy Father . Mankind served there own dying flesh a legion of father (patron saints)

 

[backNforth]

Hi thanks

Catholiscim as a law of the fathers. . oral traditions of dying mankind . They make claim of the cannon assemblers. By puffing up there dying fathers above all things written in law and prophets (sola scriptura)

Every word of Christ is inspired by Him all of cannon is inspired of Christ, the one cannon assembler.

1 Corinthians 4 6-7And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.;For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?

Same ones that puffed themselves up as the supposed cannon assemblers

The reason for the first century reformation false prophets showing thier hatred for sola scriptura .

Paul went from murderer Acts chapter 22 to preacher of sola scriptura Acts 24

Acts 24:13-14 Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.; But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:

Rather than worshiping the unseen eternal Holy Father . Mankind served there own dying flesh a legion of father (patron saints)

Yeah, I get your gist. And you are correct. Those blind guides, which strain at a gnat and swallow a camel, are littered throughout forums and the world at large. They are forced to play word-game catch-ups when they are confronted with the spirit of truth. Keep preaching the truth and don't let the worldly "puffers" steal your breath.

 

[Brad Huber]

No, you never said that. You simply acted that way.

This is the classic log and speck parable. You may wish to reconsider. (Kindly spoken even though you are not likely to believe it.)

For which you then act as press secretary. (See my point?)

You have no idea who I am or what the Lord has wrought in my life. If you DID have this "Holy Spirit" access to God, then maybe He would tell you exactly who I am. But you don't. Though you think you do.

Non-intellectual Christians are more easily swayed by Satan into believing they have some special divine insight when really, they don't. Their own ignorance deludes them. This is the exact reason that the JW's eject intelligent people from their midst. Pentecostals and Charismatics (to the despair of God) do the same thing.

And your "Intellectual Christian" can far better discern the actual voice of the Holy Spirit from imaginative "urgings."

You use a Shibboleth without adequate comprehension. (Which kind of proves my point.)

Rhema

You are simply too arrogant to accept that you are wrong about anything. Look at who Jesus picked as His 12 apostles. And Jesus said if you want to get to heaven, you must be trustful like a child. I dont disdain intellect, I respect the truth and seek it out, but I also respect God enough to know that without the guidance of the Holy Spirit, you will be pretty much like the pharisees and teachers of the law in His time on earth of whom Jesus made very clear His feelings about them. And just because the Lord sometimes shares info with me through the Holy Spirit doesnt mean I know everything about everything as if I was His press secretary. He gives me the equivalent of a drop of water from His ocean of knowledge. Because its not that important to be all knowing about all things, its what led to the downfall of satan, pride. What I dont know for sure, I say so if the subject arises, and simply put it on the backburner for a time when if and when the Lord decides to share that knowledge with me. I dont try and put my faith in stone about what is right and wrong about everything. But you have answers for nearly everything as if you DO know it all, and on the rare occasions you ask a question, you already know what you believe the answer is, but want others to comment to either agree with your foregone conclusion on the matter, or if they believe differently you "kindly" (yeah, right) tell them they are lacking for some reason or another.

 

[backNforth]

You are simply too arrogant to accept that you are wrong about anything...you have answers for nearly everything as if you DO know it all, and on the rare occasions you ask a question, you already know what you believe the answer is, but want others to comment to either agree with your foregone conclusion on the matter, or if they believe differently you "kindly" (yeah, right) tell them they are lacking for some reason or another.

I agree with that observation, but our time is finite, a gift, and ought not be wasted. So let's not give any more life to that dead thing i.e. let's stop feeding it. Declare the truth and move on. We don't wrestle against flesh and blood...

Who prays for discernment and protection before he enters this site? Who prays for the welfare of its less-than-gracious posters?

 

[Rhema]

Every word of Christ is inspired by Him all of cannon is inspired of Christ, the one cannon assembler.

Okay Garee, I get it. Your canon was delivered by a stork.

I knew better than to ask.

Thanks,
Rhema

 

[Rhema]

You are simply too arrogant to accept that you are wrong about anything.

Brad, the simple truth is that I don't post about anything for which I might be wrong. There's a difference. Again you don't know me and your perception of arrogance comes from your imaginative "urgings."

Besides, you are quite welcome to post anything that might actually show me to be wrong. But you don't, because you can't. And you can't, because I don't post anything about which I might be wrong. Starting to get it? (It shouldn't be hard.)

I dont disdain intellect, I respect the truth and seek it out,

I'm sure you've convinced yourself of this, but from my perspective, you're pretty much one of the Pharisees that Jesus spoke about.

He gives me the equivalent of a drop of water from His ocean of knowledge

I'm sorry your cup runneth over. But your judgments about me don't come from the Holy Spirit. And God would tell you that, even in a small drop, if you were so "sure led."

But you have answers for nearly everything as if you DO know it all,

He gives me the equivalent of a FIRE HOSE from His ocean of knowledge. And again, only an idiot would post about things he does not know, being unable to prove with sufficient sources and reasons the things that he teaches.

or if they believe differently you "kindly" (yeah, right) tell them they are lacking for some reason or another.

My posts to other members are crafted for their ears. Why are yours so ringing? You have no knowledge of private conversations I may have besides your initial condemnation of me. (But you should answer the phone, God might be calling you.)

And Jesus said if you want to get to heaven, you must be trustful like a child.

You mean trust you? Your imaginative "urgings"?

Trust your translators? (That might be part of your problem here.)

But no. God hasn't selected you to do any press releases for any of those drops.

Rhema

PS: Perhaps you could be so kind as to rephrase the following so it would make sense.

I dont try and put my faith in stone about what is right and wrong about everything.