Jesus said John 3:13 .And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
The Holy Ghost.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Jesus said John 3:13 .And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
Yes, and since time is relative to space then there could be no space so there would be no measure.In addition to having no beginning nor end of existence since it always was, is and will always be,
the 'Eternal' can not change nature or form, for to change would be the end of one and the beginning of another.
Hello Kirby.All very interesting.
First, I haven't seen anything in the OT to suggest Adam suffered any physical death from eating
the fruit.
And even the NT evidence is vague. Certainly it never explicitly says "Adam had a spiritual death
the day he ate"
That is because he was not completely destined to, he was given a choice. God didn't say you will therefore not eat the fruit, he gave them a choice to eat or not eat. Just like he may knock on your door, but you must open it. You are faced with a choice much like Adam...it is up to you to make the right one!Was Man always destined to eat the fruit?
Hello Kirby.Okay. I think I get it.
Not to get off topic -- though I think it's related -- what is the understanding of why God created man without the capacity to know good from evil in the first place? It seems that love and worship (and fear) of God did not come until Adam and Eve sinned by eating the fruit. Was Man always destined to eat the fruit? If so, then why punish him? And, if not, why create him in a literally uninspired state? Incapable of worshipping God (as Cane and Abel are, following the expulsion.)
Okay. I think I get it.
Not to get off topic -- though I think it's related -- what is the understanding of why God created
man without the capacity to know good from evil in the first place?
I think so but I may be the only one.THISCROSSHURTS: Yes. Quite familiar with it. Does it relate?
But God (as we) must have the capacity to change.
I'm not saying this is absolutely how the story works. But it's how I follow the implications. I'm interested in finding out better ways of reconciling these apparent paradoxes.
Those are the same questions I have.Not to get off topic -- though I think it's related -- what is the understanding of why God created man without the capacity to know good from evil in the first place? It seems that love and worship (and fear) of God did not come until Adam and Eve sinned by eating the fruit. Was Man always destined to eat the fruit? If so, then why punish him? And, if not, why create him in a literally uninspired state? Incapable of worshipping God (as Cane and Abel are, following the expulsion.)
The operative word here is 'initially'. Adam lived 900 plus years after his act ofThe death that took place initially for Adam was a spiritual death resulting in a separation
from God. In the end, Adam and Eve DID die physically as a result.
The operative word here is 'initially'. Adam lived 900 plus years after his act of
disobedience... then he died. The result of Adam's sin is two-fold... spiritual
death, and physical death.
The definition of 'spiritual death' involves separation from God.Question:
After Adam's heart stopped beating, and they buried his body on 6ft under (presumably), did he cease to exist. Was he no longer conscious of anything at all?
Not directed at anyone in particular.
Blessings,
Travis
You are still expecting what is not forthcoming: something for nothing.RE: People being spiritually dead/cut off from God prior to the age of Christ; and ever since (if they lack faith)…
This seems completely at odds with Genesis’ description of the creation of man. It’s quite specific that He breathed into man’s nostrils the breath of life – a divine animation. There are no qualifiers or caveats like, “…and man was only physically alive, but not yet spiritually alive…” Furthermore, at the time of the expulsion, God very specifically enumerates the curses that are Adam and Eve’s punishment: no re-admittance to the garden, eternal hard work in the fields, eternal pains during childbirth. The implication is that these are sufficient to offset their crime as the wages of their sin. And there is no mention of an additional, eternal need for redemption in a Christ.
Why is the Adamic sin not paid for by every generation who simply works for a living and endures pain during childbirth?
This alone is not sufficient for salvation. In order to enter God's realm, you must be perfectly Holy, Righteous and Blameless. But, this is not of yourself but from the one who lives in. As a Christian with Christ in you, God imparts his perfection and righteousness to you; this is how you are reconciled to God and by no other means, by Christ alone! I suggest you stop trying to figure out Genesis / Creation of the Old Testament. You live under the New Testament and that is all about getting Christ in you and nothing else matters quite frankly!Why is the Adamic sin not paid for by every generation who simply works for a living and endures pain during childbirth?
I tend to agree with you,there is more to the picture and like amadeus2 mentioned, the understanding is sort of smeared throughout scripture.This seems completely at odds with Genesis’ description of the creation of man. It’s quite specific that He breathed into man’s nostrils the breath of life – a divine animation. There are no qualifiers or caveats like, “…and man was only physically alive, but not yet spiritually alive
I don't see that God cursed or punished but that these were the natural consequences of Adam being the Judge or observer of the knowledge of good and evil.Furthermore, at the time of the expulsion, God very specifically enumerates the curses that are Adam and Eve’s punishment:
Well "eternal" doesn't fit well with the rest of that,the only eternal pain is the concept of pain and the only eternal work is the concept of work.no re-admittance to the garden, eternal hard work in the fields, eternal pains during childbirth. The implication is that these are sufficient to offset their crime as the wages of their sin. And there is no mention of an additional, eternal need for redemption in a Christ.
Sin means "missing the mark" and it is an archery term.Why is the Adamic sin not paid for by every generation who simply works for a living and endures pain during childbirth?
Technically all unbelievers are under the Covenant of Noah.You live under the New Testament and that is all about getting Christ in you and nothing else matters quite frankly!
Technically all unbelievers are under the Covenant of Noah.