I am really eager to see what each of you interprets or simply reads into your belief of Revelation.
It is interesting that thought the exercise is still in the ‘read-only’ stage, there are those who are already expressing wrongful interpretations.
Im intrigued how anyone can read that God gave Jesus a Revelation:
- “The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,”
And yet say here that ‘Jesus is God’.
An interesting discussion follows if the one giving to another is the same one who is the one who receives what was given!
Jesus gave, via the angel, to John what God gave directly to Jesus ... if Jesus is God because God gave Jesus the Revelation... then logically, the Angel must be Jesus because Jesus gave that revelation to the angel to give to John. And John must be the angel because the angel gave him the revelation that Jesus gave to the angel - who thus must be Jesus... and since Jesus is God because God gave Jesus the revelation, then the angel is God, also, and, ipso facto, John is also GOD! So goes the false reading!!
But the text says: ( ‘—>’ : ‘Gave Revelation to’)
[Almighty God —> Jesus Christ]
[Jesus Christ —> Holy Angel]
[Holy Angel —> Apostle John]
[Apostle John —> human Congregation]
Simple! How is it gotten from this that Jesus is Almighty God?
See what I mean...If responders here are stumbling at the very first verse... the OP is going to have a very difficult time with interpretations that are so far removed from truth that no credible agreements will be achieved.