To my knowledge, the apostles Peter and Paul weren't rivals, viz: they weren't
constantly trying to outdo each other.
Not rivals, but certainly of different approaches and mindsets.
• Phil 1:27 . .Whatever happens, conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the
gospel of Christ. Then, whether I come and see you or only hear about you in my
absence, I will know that you stand firm in one spirit, contending as one man for
the faith of the gospel.
• Jude 1:3 . . Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our
common salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend
earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.
Given the peace-loving nature of true God-given Christianity, I seriously doubt
either Paul or Jude mean for Christians to get involved in inquisitions and crusades.
Instead, contending for the faith means taking a serious interest in helping to
prevent your Church from becoming infected with, and/or influenced by, godless
ideologies, e.g. liberalism and so-called political correctness.
Agreed. The crusades and the Inquisition were not, imho, conducted in the name of Jesus Christ. I agree that contending for the faith includes what you've stated, but also includes unashamedly proclaiming the good news to the lost and the afraid that are without Christ in tbeir lives.
Just metaphors; and besides, those are individual responsibilities rather than teams.
More than metaphors; more like instructions, directions, commands for the individual and the collective.
I fail to detect rivalry in that activity. In point of fact, armor is an individual
responsibility rather than teams.
Again, it is more instructive, directive, commanding for both the individual and the collective. One for all and all are One.
• 2Tim 2:15 . . Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does
not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Some folks construe rightly dividing the word of truth as instructions to keep the
Old Testament completely separate from the New. But that's not even close to what
Paul is told his friend Timothy.
The Bible is one narrative, imo, and all sixty-six books are the whole counsel of God.
Paul was a blue collar tradesman: he fabricated portable shelters for a living (Acts
18:3). The Greek word for "rightly dividing" is orthotomeo (or-thot-om-eh'-o) which
means: to make a straight cut-- as opposed to a crooked cut --or a cut that misses
the line and yields a piece of material that's either too long, too short, or the wrong
contour; thus resulting in a tent whose pieces won't join properly when it comes
time to sew them together. The results? A distorted tent and a black mark for the
craftsman.
Perhaps Paul used language he was accustomed to as a tent-maker in order to get his point accross, but rightly dividing the word is akin to saying: "keep it in context, stay on point, and what is said in letter A can be used to build on what is said in letter B, C, D, E, etc." The letters were all written as one long run-on sentence, in some cases. The letters were likely read aloud in their entirity to the assembly so as to keep the entire message in context.
The intent is not one of severing the Bible in half and treating each as a separate
book, nor of breaking the New Testament in two pieces with the gospels in one and
the epistles in the other; but to be accurate in the whole's interpretations and
applications so that it all fits together perfectly from first to last, like a well made
armoire instead of a hastily constructed rabbit hutch.
Agreed. The entire Bible is the Counsel of God.
_