vhusley
Active
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2021
- Messages
- 295
So, let's try this again. I will give you another chance to see if you can truly grasp what I am attempting to show and to see if you are able to respond without getting your hackles up and screaming "heresy!"
I actually fully agree with that definition. So, if you have already BEEN (fully) saved (past tense), then according to your understanding and the definition you just gave......this means you have already stood before God and faced the "punishment of your sin" and He has already spared you from it?Saved by the cross means spared from the punishment of our sin.
So again, I ask you....Have you already stood before God's judgement? Is repentance a one-time deal or is it granted to us as an ongoing process to take place as long as we are living? What did the Apostle Paul mean we he said, "I die DAILY...."?To suggest we are not saved when we confess our sins is to suggest repentance from anyone does not pass God's judgement Jer 17:9-10
Was there a point in anything that I posted where I suggested that God only accepts repentance temporarily? Is it possible that we could turn your statement around and suggest that "it is God who grants us repentance and it is beholden to us to accept it and walk in it daily?" Could it be that WE at some point in our relationship with God could develop an unrepentant heart....even after initial repentance? Could that be what God's Word is referring to in so many places when it refers to man's heart being "hardened"?To suggest God temporarily accepts the repentance of someone is to imply He cannot truly judge the heart.
Is anything WE can do or offer really "good enough" for God? Isn't our righteousness "as filthy rags" before Him? Isn't it ONLY by the grace and mercy of God that He grants us repentance and thereby gives us access to the Cross? Aren't we expected to "take up our cross daily" and "die daily" to the flesh and to sin and to the temptations of the world if we truly belong to Him? And finally, aren't you creating a false dichotomy here when you are equating a single decision from the (wicked) heart of a man to Jesus' act of sacrifice on the cross?To suggest a single decision from the depth of our heart is not good enough for God is to imply that the single act by Jesus on the cross is equally meaningless. Jesus must keep dying for us before we believe He really loves us?
Is this biblical?A single decision at a depth of intent is all it takes.
Are you certain? Will those who "endure to the end" during the Great Tribulation have the Holy Ghost present here on Earth? Are these of whom Jesus speaks (in Matthew) and of whom John the Revelator speaks (in Revelation) being saved the same way? Will the Spirit be present on Earth to indwell them, guard them, and guide them? Or at some point, will the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit be removed?This is why those who die for Jesus in the tribulation get an eternal crown Rev 2:10.
Are we having a civil discussion? Is this language one would typically use in a civil discussion?Heresy, heresy, heresy! False teaching