Bill
Loyal
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2018
- Messages
- 4,555
So which is worse, really? The so-called extremist government of Israel, or the ongoing extremist governments of all of the Arab Nations around Israel?‘Al-Aqsa Flood’: The surprise is that some are surprised
article by - Alastair Crooke - Director of Conflicts Forum; Former Senior British Diplomat; Author.
The cry for Al-Aqsa resonated across the entire Islamic sphere. Why did the West not get it?
Al-Aqsa Flood is held to be "Israel’s" greatest ‘intelligence failure’.
Maybe so, but if Israeli and American intelligence did not see the attack coming, it is because of their Western mechanical, literal way of thinking.
If I, and probably thousands of 'Al Mayadeen' readers, broadly knew that this was in the works (but not of course, of its operational details), why was "Israel" blind to it?
Palestinians rallied to the call to safeguard the Holy Al-Aqsa Mosque.
It was not just Hamas; it was West Bank Palestinians and (for the first time, too, 1948 Palestinians who have Israeli passports) who all rose up to protect Al-Aqsa.
Just to be clear, the rallying cry was not for Hamas; it was not for Palestinian nationalism. It was for Al-Aqsa -- an icon that goes to the heart of what it is to be Muslim (Sunni or Shi’a).
It was a cry that resonated across the entire Islamic sphere.
Did the West not get it? Apparently not. It was right under their nose, but super high-tech Intel doesn’t do symbolic meaning.
So, what has this to do with Al-Aqsa Flood?
Well, the political right in Netanyahu’s government has two long-standing commitments.
One is to rebuild the Jewish Temple on ‘Temple Mount’ (Haram al-Shariff).
Just to be clear, that would entail demolishing Al-Aqsa.
The second overriding commitment is to the founding of "Israel", on the "Land of Israel".
And again, to be clear, this (in their view) would entail clearing out Palestinians from the West Bank.
Indeed, the settlers have been cleansing Palestinians from swaths of the West Bank over the past year (notably between Ramallah and Jericho).
On Thursday morning (two days preceding Al-Aqsa Flood), more than 800 settlers stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, under the full protection of Israeli forces.
The drumbeat of such provocations is rising.
This is nothing new. The First Intifada was triggered by (then) Prime Minister Sharon making a provocative visit into the mosque.
I was a part of Senator George Mitchell’s Presidential Committee investigating that incident.
Even then, it was clear that Sharon intended the visit to fuel the fire of Religious nationalism.
At that time, the Temple Mount Movement was a minnow; today it has ministers in Cabinet and in key security positions -- and has promised its followers to build the ‘Third Temple’.
‘Al-Aqsa Flood’: The surprise is that some are surprised
The cry for Al-Aqsa resonated across the entire Islamic sphere. Why did the West not get it?english.almayadeen.net
What does it mean to be extremist? Is it self-preservation, or is it complete annihilation of a whole group of people?
Seems to me that the annihilation of a whole group of people, just for believing the way they do, is more of an extreme set of ideas than anything Israel has come up with. Yet it is a very concept of many Arab Nations