Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

John 3:16 - What does it mean?

RJ

You: That's right Stickz, you made my point for me, thank you!

You can only imply that Judas recieved what Jesus gave and indeed healed the sick and cast out demons.

And my initial point, RJ, was that you needed to take it up with Jari because it was he who had brought up that Judas had performed these works to begin with. When I tried to point that out to you, you insisted that I answer for what Jari had said, post scripture for something that was originally not even my comment. I was glad to do it, of course, but next time you should really try to better keep up with what is being posted in the thread.

You: The scripture that I and others offered you has no assumed implication it is fact. John 12:4-6
Judas was a Thief and evil.

I have not at any time denied that Judas was a thief, RJ. I have not tried to make him out to be a saint, or anything like that. I'm not real sure why there is such a big deal being made over what was said about this scripture. I actually remember acknowledging that I understood why Jari had said what he had said about Judas stealing from the bag. I read mostly from other versions of the Bible that do not specifically say it, so I had never actually understood that he had done so. If you would only attempt to put yourself in my place for a moment, you might actually see how innocent my asking Jari for scripture on it was.

So, RJ, for MrsMree's sake, do you believe that non-believers can cast out devils, or prophesy, or heal people?
 
Hey Sticko? Are you getting my PMs? They're not showing up in my sent messages folder....
 
RJ



And my initial point, RJ, was that you needed to take it up with Jari because it was he who had brought up that Judas had performed these works to begin with. When I tried to point that out to you, you insisted that I answer for what Jari had said, post scripture for something that was originally not even my comment. I was glad to do it, of course, but next time you should really try to better keep up with what is being posted in the thread.



I have not at any time denied that Judas was a thief, RJ. I have not tried to make him out to be a saint, or anything like that. I'm not real sure why there is such a big deal being made over what was said about this scripture. I actually remember acknowledging that I understood why Jari had said what he had said about Judas stealing from the bag. I read mostly from other versions of the Bible that do not specifically say it, so I had never actually understood that he had done so. If you would only attempt to put yourself in my place for a moment, you might actually see how innocent my asking Jari for scripture on it was.

So, RJ, for MrsMree's sake, do you believe that non-believers can cast out devils, or prophesy, or heal people?

So, RJ, for MrsMree's sake, do you believe that non-believers can cast out devils, or prophesy, or heal people?

No.
So what is your point?
 
No, MrsMree, I have not received anything from you in quite some time. I sent you a PM a while back and waited for some time for a response but it never came. Apparently, I should have asked you about it ...? Sorry, I have been dealing with something, and just assumed that you were busy and would get back to me when you were ready. I still cannot get into the Chat and do not know why, but if you have Yahoo Messenger feel free to contact me that way.

My point, RJ, is that you agree with me, that's all. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Sorry I am trying to add you Stickz and failing miserably. I thiiiink I have done it now... are you online?
 
A topic that pains my heart. Where does God say that someone becomes unsaved? Or that he will leave them? Can I be un-born having been reborn? Can the Christian go to the lake of fire?

For the first three years of my journey with Christ I believed that nothing could possibly happen that would cause me to loose my salvation. No one could convince me otherwise. I was on the other side of this very discussion. I gave all of the points to consider that have been given me and backed up my claim with the same scripture and logic that is being shown to me to say that I am wrong in my understanding. As I stood on the mountain tops screaming OSAS is doctrinal, I never thought in a million years I could be wrong. After all I had studied the bible for years.

One day I came upon a scripture that said, be ye not deceived. My heart about stopped. I could be deceived I thought? You mean everything that I think could be wrong? A picture of the Pharisees may as well went through my mind wondering how they could have the OT and be deceived of its true meaning. What should I do? I went to prayer absolutely begging God not to let me be deceived. Asking him to show me his ways. Telling him I understood if he would say no because I am not worthy of saving. I remembered how Jesus sent up prayer and supplication with strong crying and tears to the one who was able to save him from death and was heard in that he feared. My bible reading changed. Things weren't adding up right. The doctrines I had formerly held became in question. I went through a period of confusion as I had new things I was understanding from scripture while the old were still engrained in me. Over time the truth gave way to that which is false and for the first time in my Christian life I didn't have to add to the scriptures for them to all make sense together. I didn't have to 'understand' the seeming contradictions anymore. There were none.

Today when I look at scripture I see what my eyes have been opened to see. It is simple and straight forward. My heart goes out to those who cannot see what I do and I always try to make clear that I understand that I could be the one who is blind (how would I know) but with the way the scriptures read clearly to me today it seems like an impossibility that Satan is leading me astray. I offer the following for meditation. I know that there are crafted answers to refute the claims of reading the scripture straight forward but I will try none the less.

Can a Christian die the 2nd death?

8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive; 9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. 10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. 11 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.

In a letter unto Smyrna, a church of born again Christian believers it is told to them that in order not to be hurt of the second death they must overcome. So in essence those who do not overcome will be hurt by the second death. Born twice, die twice.

1 And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead. 2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God. 3 Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee. 4 Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy. 5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels. 6 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

In a letter to the church at Sardis it is written that there are a few who had not defiled their garments and these are called worthy because they did not do the works that would defile them. Only those who overcome do not have their name blotted out of the book of life.

16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? 17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

Here we have a direct statement about a Christian who has the indwelling Holy Spirit. God will destroy him if he defiles the temple of his body.

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

In order to have your name taken out of the book of life it must be in there first. To have a part in the Holy City one must be headed for the Kingdom of heaven. If a bible believing Christian takes away from the book of this prophecy he will be taken out.

18 For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. 19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. 20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. 21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

In the context of false teachers we find the statement about believers who knew the way of righteousness but turned after the false teachers instead. This would make them heretics and heretics will not inherit the Kingdom of heaven (Gal 5).

But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father who is in heaven forgive your trespasses. Mk 11:26

This cannot be refuted without adding to the scripture a personal explanation of how this doesn't apply to eternal life. Adding to scripture never gives truth.

12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God. 13 But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;(Heb 3)

A clear warning to born again Christians that it could happen to you. There is the big "IF" in there about being made partakers. Where there is an if there is a condition that is possible not to meet. Meditate on this truth.

1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2 Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 3 And this will we do, if God permit. 4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. 7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: 8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
9 But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak

Following the warning in Chapter 3 we find this in Chapter 6. Notice the author begins by summarizing the principle doctrines of Christianity and then says we will move on from these if God permit. Very important to understand that if your going to understand why he would then warn them of apostasy. The idea is getting the foundation secure and moving on to grow. Remember that he just called his audience 'dull of hearing' in Chapter 5. He is being plain and open with them but states they still might not get what he is saying because they are slow to hear. The connecting term 'For' used in verse 4 connects the two thoughts. The thought of the impossible return to repentance is connected to the thought of finishing the foundation of belief. It simply says look here is what we covered you better hear 'quickly' because there are no second chances if you leave. In verse 7 we have the connecting term again 'For' to connect the illustration to the previous thought. The unfruitful field that gets burned. Followed in verse 9 to pull it all together to a climax 'But' a contradictory contraction to connect this thought to the previous. But we believe you will be saved. The whole thought can be summed up as, here is the foundation laid secure if you fall away you will be damned but we don't believe you will.

26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Continuing in the same book with the same thought process the author has used from the beginning. Once again he warns against willful disobedience. This book is written to Jewish believers who are holy brethren and partakers of the heavenly calling (Heb 3:1). The call back to chapter 6 is clearly seen here when the author speaks of no more sacrifice for sin. You cannot crucify Jesus a second time to yourself.

Time would fail me to tell of the man who if he eats against conscience would be damned, or the young widow who remarries being damned having cast of her first faith, or the man who is worse than an infidel that has denied the faith by not caring for those of his own household, or Judas who by transgression fell (Acts 1:25) in order to fall you must first be standing.

I think one of the hardest principles to teach Christians is what is unbelief. Only unbelief can keep you out of heaven. Only faith can get you in. If one honestly reads all of these accounts with the idea that 'faith' must be 'justified' by works and the 'faith' that saves is Abrahams (Rom 4:11-12), then the truth can be easily understood.



To anyone who would reply to this post I have 2 questions.

  1. Do you love me?
  2. What does that look like?

In the love of Christ

Gary
 
That's just the thing right there Gary, they have merely tasted. They had come close as experiencing the holy spirit. Yet they recrucify Christ for them self.

they seem to go back to trying to earn all that they have tasted instead of believing in one time sacrafice and that it's of grace they got so close at the first place.

Also it doesnt say they leave "believing" now they continue religiosity by recrucifying christ for the self because they think this thats the way....
it doesnt actually say they were apostate. or that they were not interested anymore. They simply fall away from what they tasted.

Also their action of recrucifying christ puts him to open shame. why? its something they publically do.

the definition of the words "put him to an open shame." :
From G3844 and G1165; to show alongside (the public), that is, expose to infamy: - make a public example, put to an open shame.


And it doest say they have indwell of HS. they became partakers but it doesnt imply indwell. As holy spirit can be experienced in many ways.
Even in Old testament king Saul and his men were overcome by holy spirit. that doesnt mean they got holy spirit permanetely but they just experienced it.

Jari, you add a lot to scripture to try and explain what it all means. It doesn't say they tasted of the Holy Spirit but yet partook. It says nothing about going back to try to earn anything, it just says they left the right path (fall away). It says they cannot re crucify him. It doesn't have to say that the Holy Spirit was indwelling them but simply partakers. As soon as one believes they are given the gift of the Holy Spirit. Your trying to tell me that those mentioned here who fall away never believed. You can't fall way from something you don't believe.

I hope you will study this again without all the added explanations that can only come from the imagination.

With love in Christ

Gary
 
agua

First of all, I posted all of the translations of that verse because of what RJ had posted about it. Secondly, I have never made the connection that he stole from the treasury because I read mostly from one of those versions that doesn't specifically say that he took from it; it only says that he carried the bag.


Oky doky. I didn't get the gist of the confusion between you and RJ.

It has always been clear to me that Judas stole from the bag because the connection was made that he wanted the money from the sale of the oil "not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief".
All translations I've seen imply this.

** I just read back a couple of posts and see there's no more confusion about Judas stealing from the bag **
: /

The word 'choose' is very similar to the word 'elect' which means that Judas had been elected.


Jesus use of "choose" concerning Judas doesn't mean he was elected for salvation. It simply means Jesus chose him as a follower.
Identifying Judas as a devil makes it clear he wasn't a true believer.


I believe that all this is showing is that sometimes people are placed in the churches by God to fulfill His purposes, and sometimes those people turn out to be and do bad things. Aren't all of us chosen by God to fulfill His purpose? I wonder how man:secret:y of us are confused about what are purpose is exactly? I don't believe that it is possible that Judas was bad through and through, or any worse of a person than the rest of us.
Yeah God does choose particular people for His purposes but I don't think we can compare a backsliding/disobedient Christian to Judas. ( If that's your point ? ) Judas was chosen by Jesus as part of His ultimate redemption plan. Jesus didn't force Judas to be "a devil" but knew his heart and what he would do. If people are in our Churches today in the vein of Judas we can be sure they aren't true believers.
What was it that it says Judas had obtained? A part in this ministry? You say that he was never one of them but scripture seems to say that he was.



Act 1:17 NKJV for he was numbered with us and obtained a part in this ministry."

Judas was numbered with the disciples but this doesn't mean he was a true believer/follower. Jesus was numbered with the transgressors remember but we know He wasn't one. Judas obtained his place with the group just as any professing Christian can be a wolf in sheep's clothing.


.......
Hindsight. In a thousand years, perhaps, even some of the people in this forum will be able to be likened to a false prophet too, but most probably see that as an impossibility.
It's possible many professing Christians are false prophets . Interesting eh.
 
Last edited:
Jari, you add a lot to scripture to try and explain what it all means. It doesn't say they tasted of the Holy Spirit but yet partook. It says nothing about going back to try to earn anything, it just says they left the right path (fall away). It says they cannot re crucify him. It doesn't have to say that the Holy Spirit was indwelling them but simply partakers. As soon as one believes they are given the gift of the Holy Spirit. Your trying to tell me that those mentioned here who fall away never believed. You can't fall way from something you don't believe.

I hope you will study this again without all the added explanations that can only come from the imagination.

With love in Christ

Gary

Consider this , The disciples were not born again at first. They were not given the Holy spirit first. It was only after resurrection they were given Holy spirit. So yes you can be partaker in Holy spirit like Judas was and not be saved if you don't believe like Judas didnt believe in Jesus as savior. Joh 20:22

I think i have explained how hebrews shows in its context what recrucifying meant... obviously it was an error. and i think it was caused by unbelief.

I hope you see what i mean. I think i have perfectly reasonable explanation because saying that born again would recrucify and fall away does not make sense since this shouldnt be possible for born again. As I have already shown you verse that says its not possible.

But if you dont agree with my explanation can you tell me what does "recrucifying the Son of God to your self afresh" mean?
 
Last edited:
agua: Jesus use of "choose" concerning Judas doesn't mean he was elected for salvation. It simply means Jesus chose him as a follower.
Identifying Judas as a devil makes it clear he wasn't a true believer.
So, sometimes "chosen" or "elected" doesn't mean that one was chosen or elected for salvation, thanks for clearing that up. I agree, agua, that Judas did not turn out to be a true believer. He was given the opportunity, was given an office, but he messed things up.

agua: Yeah God does choose particular people for His purposes but I don't think we can compare a backsliding/disobedient Christian to Judas. ( If that's your point ? )
If a person dies in a backslidden/disobedient state, we still could not compare them to Judas? And why is that exactly, agua? What exactly is the difference between a disobedient Christian and whatever it is that you think Judas was?

agua: Judas was chosen by Jesus as part of His ultimate redemption plan. Jesus didn't force Judas to be "a devil" but knew his heart and what he would do. If people are in our Churches today in the vein of Judas we can be sure they aren't true believers.
Again, I agree, if it turns out that a person doesn't follow Christ wholly, then in the end, we could say that they weren't really true believers to begin with.

agua: Judas was numbered with the disciples but this doesn't mean he was a true believer/follower. Jesus was numbered with the transgressors remember but we know He wasn't one. Judas obtained his place with the group just as any professing Christian can be a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Are you saying that you believe that Judas' motivation for following Jesus and the other disciples around, for three years, was because they kept enough money in that bag for him, to steal from, to appease his "devilishness"?

Today, it is easy for someone who doesn't truly believe to go and sit in a church building on Sunday ( or Saturday if that's your thing ) and pretend to be a true Christian, but we are talking about an entirely different set of circumstances when we are talking about someone who followed Jesus around for three years. Often out in the weather conditions, probably often without a lot of food, constantly criticized, constantly being rebuked by Jesus ....
I just see where Judas had to have had a little bit of motivation to have hung in there for three years. Do you think that Judas' motivation was because he had been planning to betray Jesus from the start?

agua: It's possible many professing Christians are false prophets . Interesting eh.
Isn't it? Even those who are absolutely sure that they are saved. The best deceiver would be one whom is deceived himself.

Hebrews 6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. ( KJV )

Hebrews 6:6 then falling away, it is impossible for them again to renew to repentance, crucifying again for themselves the Son of God, and putting Him to open shame. ( Green's Literal Translation )

Hebrews 6:6 and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put him to an open shame. ( NASB )

The verse seems to obviously be referring to someone who had at one time before been renewed to repentance: hence the word 'again'.

Jari

Show scripture and explain what you mean when you say that Judas was a partaker in the Holy Ghost. I think that I have already covered some of this for you, but I want to see it in your words, please.
 
So, sometimes "chosen" or "elected" doesn't mean that one was chosen or elected for salvation, thanks for clearing that up.


Jesus chose Judas for a purpose and this has nothing to do with him being elect as regarding salvation. I'm not sure what I cleared up.

I agree, agua, that Judas did not turn out to be a true believer. He was given the opportunity, was given an office, but he messed things up.
We don't agree. You are suggesting at some time Judas was a true believer. Jesus made it clear Judas was a devil.

Joh 6:70 Jesus answered them, "Did I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?"
If a person dies in a backslidden/disobedient state, we still could not compare them to Judas? And why is that exactly, agua? What exactly is the difference between a disobedient Christian and whatever it is that you think Judas was?
Judas was a devil. He didn't start out as a true believer and fulfilled the purpose Jesus knew he would. Judas was exactly how Jesus described him and I accept that as true. A disobedient Christian is one who isn't a devil I suggest.

Again, I agree, if it turns out that a person doesn't follow Christ wholly, then in the end, we could say that they weren't really true believers to begin with.
Again we don't agree on the comparison of Judas to a backsliding Christian. You are implying Judas was a true believer at some stage when he wasn't. He was among those that were in the same vein as a professing Christian can be a church member while never having true belief.

Are you saying that you believe that Judas' motivation for following Jesus and the other disciples around, for three years, was because they kept enough money in that bag for him, to steal from, to appease his "devilishness"?



I am saying Judas heart was never in good standing and that he stayed with Jesus for selfish reasons one of which has been portrayed in scripture as money. Are you suggesting money wouldn't make someone follow ? Have you never seen a money driven professing Christian before ?

Remember even hypocrites are capable of doing good deeds.


Today, it is easy for someone who doesn't truly believe to go and sit in a church building on Sunday ( or Saturday if that's your thing ) and pretend to be a true Christian, but we are talking about an entirely different set of circumstances when we are talking about someone who followed Jesus around for three years. Often out in the weather conditions, probably often without a lot of food, constantly criticized, constantly being rebuked by Jesus .... I just see where Judas had to have had a little bit of motivation to have hung in there for three years. Do you think that Judas' motivation was because he had been planning to betray Jesus from the start?




Professing Christians can go to church all their lives and yet not have true belief. Some televangelists have been reaping monetary rewards by following Jesus for far longer than 3 years. Money can be a sore motivator and seductive master.

Judas was identified as a devil by Jesus and acted upon the desires of his heart. Judas couldn't have planned on betraying Jesus from the start because no one had any idea of the direction Jesus ministry would take. When the opportunity arose for him to make a large profit by betraying Jesus he acted according to his nature and fulfilled the prophecy for people such as himself.

Once again Judas was never a true believer at any stage and was numbered with the disciples in spite of this.


Isn't it? Even those who are absolutely sure that they are saved. The best deceiver would be one whom is deceived himself.


Yes many people deceive themselves and then attempt to draw others into their world. Unfortunately both the leader and the follower fall into a pit.


 
Last edited:

Jari

Show scripture and explain what you mean when you say that Judas was a partaker in the Holy Ghost. I think that I have already covered some of this for you, but I want to see it in your words, please.
[/COLOR][/COLOR]

sorry what did you cover for me? I have forgotten what exactly that was. Well id say the scripture that Judas was partaker of HS is that Jesus send the disciples to cast out demons and heal the sick and they did so.

No mention that judas would have failed in this.
Also i already mentioned how people experienced HS in old testament. just random people really.
So does mere experience of HS make one born again? well it could but not nessarily. it didnt make judas. He still betrayed Jesus after all that.

And king saul had many experiences and even had Holy spirit from God but God also took it away. Seems like he wasnt born again either.
 
OVERCOME, OR ELSE -- These final Sapaugh statements are typical of the Overcomer teaching, i.e., "faithfulness" and "good works" to the "very end," or it is "outer darkness" for you!

Now imagine standing before God and seeing all you have lived for reduced to ashes. How do you think you would feel? How do you think you would respond? Picture yourself watching saint after saint rewarded for faithfulness and service to the King--and all the time knowing that you had just as many opportunities but did nothing about them.
We cannot conceive of the agony and frustration we would feel if we were to undergo such an ordeal; the realization that our unfaithfulness had cost us eternally would be devastating. And so it will be for many believers.

Just as those who are found faithful will rejoice, so those who suffer loss will weep. As some are celebrated for their faithfulness, others will gnash their teeth in frustration over their own shortsightedness and greed .





<DIR>Though he [a disciple] had found the narrow gate and, by faith, passed through it on the restricted way, yet the question remained about how and where he should now construct his life’s experience. And to this there could be one answer for him also. He must build on the words of Jesus, for if he did not, calamity awaited him as well--not the calamity of eternal hell, to be sure, but calamity just the same.

No wonder then that Paul strove to run a winning race and to avoid disqualification by his Judge (I Cor. 9:27). No wonder he entertained the thought that the life’s work of a man might be consumed by the flames of the Judgment Seat of Christ (1 Cor. 3:11-15). It is quite true that Paul taught justification apart from works. But he did not teach Christian living apart from works .

All of this Overcomer structure is built upon Matthew's Parable of the Wedding Banquet. If it is admitted to be but a symbolic, metaphorical parable, how is it that their leaders draw from this non-literal, parabolic, source to construct a doctrine upon which the eternal future of the Christian hinges? Parables are not the basis of doctrine.

There is no suggestion here of punishment or torment. The presence of remorse, in the form of weeping and gnashing of teeth, does not in any way require this inference. Indeed, what we actually see in the image itself is a man soundly "trussed up" out in the darkened grounds of the king’s private estate, while the banquet hall glows with light and reverberates with the joys of those inside. That is what we actually see. And that is all!

"If by grace, then is it no more of works; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace..." (Rom. 11:6).




</DIR>
To be sure, we have also accepted an invitation to live in God’s kingdom. That destiny can be ours by simple faith alone, and is never subject at all to divine review. But to set forth on the pathway to Christian living is to hear God’s call to the highest privileges which eternity affords. It is to respond to the challenge to become joint-heirs with the King and to enter richly into His special joys. But before the celebration begins, there must come the review!
 
Last edited:
Jari: sorry what did you cover for me? I have forgotten what exactly that was. Well id say the scripture that Judas was partaker of HS is that Jesus send the disciples to cast out demons and heal the sick and they did so.

No mention that judas would have failed in this.

I was just trying to explain your point of view on something, Jari, and according to this post of yours, I didn't do too bad of a job. Thanks for your response, Jari.

agua

You are correct, we do not agree, but I have learned something. Thanks.


 
... Well id say the scripture that Judas was partaker of HS is that Jesus send the disciples to cast out demons and heal the sick and they did so.

No mention that judas would have failed in this.

There is also no mention that Judas cast out demons or healed the sick. It is an assumption to think he did.

[/QUOTE]
 
Honestly, by reading some of your posts concerning America in another thread, obviously you really don't seem to understand it.

Start with the first prepositional phrase of verse 16.
"For God so loved the world".

Is it inclusive or exclusive?
John 3:16 is stated clearly for those who believe. Nobody else.
 
There is also no mention that Judas cast out demons or healed the sick. It is an assumption to think he did.

Jesus rebuked them of failing only in one case. The one that needed much fasting and prayer.

I think its reasonable assumption that Judas did. They came all back rejoicing.

Actually there was 70 of them, not just the disciples.


Luk 10:17 And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name.

But none of these people we not born again yet...

So its still assumption who used Jesus name to do this. But basically they did it in group somehow or in pairs.
The point still remains that none of them were born again yet.
 
Last edited:
OVERCOME, OR ELSE -- These final Sapaugh statements are typical of the Overcomer teaching, i.e., "faithfulness" and "good works" to the "very end," or it is "outer darkness" for you!

Now imagine standing before God and seeing all you have lived for reduced to ashes. How do you think you would feel? How do you think you would respond? Picture yourself watching saint after saint rewarded for faithfulness and service to the King--and all the time knowing that you had just as many opportunities but did nothing about them.
We cannot conceive of the agony and frustration we would feel if we were to undergo such an ordeal; the realization that our unfaithfulness had cost us eternally would be devastating. And so it will be for many believers.

Just as those who are found faithful will rejoice, so those who suffer loss will weep. As some are celebrated for their faithfulness, others will gnash their teeth in frustration over their own shortsightedness and greed .
First off, if one lives selfishly and wastes his life in profligate living despite his Christian 'profession', that profession will mean absolutely nothing in the final analysis. There are three parables in Matthew 25 which all speak to those who claim Christ but did not live up to their profession.
#1, the foolish virgins. Because they did not have enough oil in their lamps and went in search of some too late, they were shut out of the kingdom. Jesus came, but they were missing. This parable is set in context of the second coming. Only those who have oil (Holy Spirit) in their lamps (living by the word of God) will be saved.
#2, the talents. The unprofitable servant , when all was finally judged, was cast into the outer darkness where there will be wailing, weeping, and gnashing of teeth. In Matthew 8:10-12 Jesus compares the weeping and gnashing of teeth in the outer darkness as a separate place to the kingdom of heaven. Same could be said of the wedding guest that refused to wear the wedding garment in Matthew 22:13.
In Luke 13:24-30 Jesus is being decidedly clear and succinct when He describes those weeping in the outer darkness as being workers of iniquity, shut out eternally from the kingdom of God.
#3, the sheep and the goats. The goats went into everlasting punishment. All three parables are given to describe the comparison between those that are finally saved, and those who are finally lost. They all end with the same result, but seen from different perspectives, in order to describe different people, and their lifestyles. The bottom line is that Jesus is making clear that their is only one way to finally attain to everlasting life. And that is through faithful loving service to God as seen in our loving faithful service to one another, based on our acceptance of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and allowing Him to do His works through us. We are judged by those works. If the works are missing, then that is all the evidence God needs to ascertain that Jesus was missing. God would have it though any other way, that is why Jesus throughout His life repeatedly warned of the right way.


<dir>Though he [a disciple] had found the narrow gate and, by faith, passed through it on the restricted way, yet the question remained about how and where he should now construct his life’s experience. And to this there could be one answer for him also. He must build on the words of Jesus, for if he did not, calamity awaited him as well--not the calamity of eternal hell, to be sure, but calamity just the same.







</dir>
Take another look at Luke 13:24-28
24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.
25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:
26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets.
27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity.
28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out.


Jesus is speaking here again of those who are in the outer darkness, weeping and gnashing their teeth. The exact same expression used elsewhere. Dare we presume this place of outer darkness is a different place that that place described elsewhere in His other parables? Of course not, it must be the same place. Jesus, in the above passage of scripture, makes it abundantly clear that those in the outer darkness did not enter the narrow or strait gate, unlike the assertion in the above quote. I hope you wouldn't suggest that those who tried to enter the strait gate but were refused entry for some reason are still in heaven, only weeping because of lost opportunities. That is far far away from the message Jesus is at great pains to deliver.
I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity.
 
Back
Top