True enough fruits are to be monitored but as we saw in Matt 7 they are not a 100% litmus test without major discernent as the devil can duplicate many things and also his ministers can manifest themselves as angels of light.
Fruits have their root in doctrine. What a man believes normally manifests itself to varying degrees. Thus this current trend of abandoning doctrine is not a fruit of God's Spirit when the Scripture is replete with injunctions to teach sound doctrine and to avoid those who do not.
A lad south of me happily declares that he doesn't teach doctrine because doctrine divides. Well, he just proved he has no clue because the word doctrine means teaching or instruction so obviously he is teaching or instructing people in something. The question is not if he is but rather what doctrine is he teaching and is it sound? Actually, it isn't because he is just teaching marshmallow fluff not even milk let alone meat. Jokes and nice stories don't feed the bulldog let alone the soul.
So doctrine must be placed along side of fruit to get a good picture of the person or movement. I wear glasses and I need two lenses to have perfect vision. Likewise if I don't use doctrine I won't get a clear picture of the fruit or works. If sound doctrine is abused or denied then no matter how sweet the fruit looks it is spoiled and poisoned like what the lads had in Matt 7.
Another fruit to look at is can a leader have his teaching evaluated and challenged without anger or curses being hurled at the one asking the questions? If you get the old "down go up against God's man", touch not his anointed" or "you're a heretic hunter" then he is at best in the flesh and at worst a heretic. If Paul could challenge Peter's actions and Paul was thrilled that the Bereans were checking his doctrine out then there is no pastor/elder/bishop/pope/grand pooba that can't be questioned or ask to prove his doctrine.
I tell my people all the time to be sure and study not just take Chairman Ron's word for it. I don't give them a little red book to memorize MY wisdom or doctrine. I tell them if they think I am wrong don't bring me feelings, cultural stuff, opinions or just what Dr. Goodwords said on the TV but bring me Scripture in context and we will study the issue together and if I am worng I will thank you for not leaving me in my ignorance.
Bottom line- Look at the doctrine that is the root of the fruit and you will know what type of tree you are really looking at.
Fruits have their root in doctrine. What a man believes normally manifests itself to varying degrees. Thus this current trend of abandoning doctrine is not a fruit of God's Spirit when the Scripture is replete with injunctions to teach sound doctrine and to avoid those who do not.
A lad south of me happily declares that he doesn't teach doctrine because doctrine divides. Well, he just proved he has no clue because the word doctrine means teaching or instruction so obviously he is teaching or instructing people in something. The question is not if he is but rather what doctrine is he teaching and is it sound? Actually, it isn't because he is just teaching marshmallow fluff not even milk let alone meat. Jokes and nice stories don't feed the bulldog let alone the soul.
So doctrine must be placed along side of fruit to get a good picture of the person or movement. I wear glasses and I need two lenses to have perfect vision. Likewise if I don't use doctrine I won't get a clear picture of the fruit or works. If sound doctrine is abused or denied then no matter how sweet the fruit looks it is spoiled and poisoned like what the lads had in Matt 7.
Another fruit to look at is can a leader have his teaching evaluated and challenged without anger or curses being hurled at the one asking the questions? If you get the old "down go up against God's man", touch not his anointed" or "you're a heretic hunter" then he is at best in the flesh and at worst a heretic. If Paul could challenge Peter's actions and Paul was thrilled that the Bereans were checking his doctrine out then there is no pastor/elder/bishop/pope/grand pooba that can't be questioned or ask to prove his doctrine.
I tell my people all the time to be sure and study not just take Chairman Ron's word for it. I don't give them a little red book to memorize MY wisdom or doctrine. I tell them if they think I am wrong don't bring me feelings, cultural stuff, opinions or just what Dr. Goodwords said on the TV but bring me Scripture in context and we will study the issue together and if I am worng I will thank you for not leaving me in my ignorance.
Bottom line- Look at the doctrine that is the root of the fruit and you will know what type of tree you are really looking at.