Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

What is sin to a believer?

@Ivar,
Do you speak english to a foreigner who doesn't understand what you're saying, or do you initially speak to them in their own language gradually teaching them? This is what John, James and Peter was doing with their Jewish brethren. They were feeding them milk instead of meat; talking to them in their language so they could understand the basics. John was talking to unbelievers as well as believers, but as we read the chapters, those that were Christians were babes and no telling how many unbelievers. If you desire to use the term "sin" that's your choice, but you have plenty information speaking otherwise. Whether you call is sin, dead works or unfruitful works, if you don't repent from whatever work you call it, you will die. The conversation should be closed on that subject.

The reason I'm on this site is because I like the fellowship. I have never been able to interact talking about Christ this much in a single setting the way I do here. I love it.
 
@Ivar,
Do you speak english to a foreigner who doesn't understand what you're saying, or do you initially speak to them in their own language gradually teaching them? This is what John, James and Peter was doing with their Jewish brethren. They were feeding them milk instead of meat; talking to them in their language so they could understand the basics. John was talking to unbelievers as well as believers, but as we read the chapters, those that were Christians were babes and no telling how many unbelievers. If you desire to use the term "sin" that's your choice, but you have plenty information speaking otherwise. Whether you call is sin, dead works or unfruitful works, if you don't repent from whatever work you call it, you will die. The conversation should be closed on that subject.

The reason I'm on this site is because I like the fellowship. I have never been able to interact talking about Christ this much in a single setting the way I do here. I love it.

@regibassman57
1. I would probably resort to Body language or Google Translate.
2. John, James, and Peter did not need to really break anything down or feed them milk. At least their is not indication of that in Scripture. Most of the disciples to my knowledge were simple minded in the context of easily understood. Is not hard to understand a fisherman. Now a Pharisee of Pharisees/ Lawyer of Lawyers such as Paul is something else. Plus only Paul specifically mentioned that he was feeding the believers milk.
3. I also appreciate talking on these forums but some things come to an end eventually.
 
@Ivar

Hebrews 5:13
For every one that uses milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness:for he is a babe.
Hebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongs to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

This is the principle understanding in life. This is not speaking to one specific groug of people, this is true for every person in Christ. This is needful until a believer is with Christ. We learn about Christ daily and we need milk daily in some area of Christ's teaching. For me to say they were drinking milk is accurate; they were babes.
 
@Ivar

Hebrews 5:13
For every one that uses milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness:for he is a babe.
Hebrews 5:14
But strong meat belongs to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

This is the principle understanding in life. This is not speaking to one specific groug of people, this is true for every person in Christ. This is needful until a believer is with Christ. We learn about Christ daily and we need milk daily in some area of Christ's teaching. For me to say they were drinking milk is accurate; they were babes.
@regibassman57
:grin:
Rom 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
Rom 3:2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
 
@ Ivar,

We know there is no profit in circumcision because Jesus finished the work of circumcision. Israel was given the oracle of the Mosaic Law; this is what they were taught. This is also why they were struggling to understand the simplicity of the Gospel of Christ (2Cor. 11:13). This needed milk instead of meat as they were use to the Mosaic teachings.

I'm writing a post entitled, "Must believers keep the Torah"
 
@ Ivar,

We know there is no profit in circumcision because Jesus finished the work of circumcision. Israel was given the oracle of the Mosaic Law; this is what they were taught. This is also why they were struggling to understand the simplicity of the Gospel of Christ (2Cor. 11:13). This needed milk instead of meat as they were use to the Mosaic teachings.

I'm writing a post entitled, "Must believers keep the Torah"
@regibassman57
Does that mean Romans 3:1-2 is irrelevant, and no longer applies, and is void?
also
Does Christ completing the work of not committing adultery means we are free from such works and free to do so?
 
@Ivar,
Circumcision entered through Abraham first for a Covenant between God and man. It also transfered unto the Mosaic Covenant. Circumcision was a carnal commandment within that those covenants, but once Jesus came He crucified all carnal rituals on the cross. Once Jesus died, He circumcised every man's heart "one time" instead of the circumcision of the flesh of man's forskin.

Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; "neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh"
Rom 2:29
But "he is a Jew", which is one "inwardly"; and "circumcision is that of the heart", "in the spirit", and "not in the letter" (Mosaic Law); whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Gal 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, "Christ shall profit you nothing."

This warning is not just to adult males, but this is also to adults circumcising their children to be justified and obedient to the Law of Moses.
 
of course belivers can sin it say so right here in scripture what to do when it happens

Matthew 18:15
“If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.
 
@Dave,
I don't know if you're addressing your post to me, but I'm through with the sin conversation as we've been beating it up. What you just presented has been answered in my other posts.
 
@Ivar,
Circumcision entered through Abraham first for a Covenant between God and man. It also transfered unto the Mosaic Covenant. Circumcision was a carnal commandment within that those covenants, but once Jesus came He crucified all carnal rituals on the cross. Once Jesus died, He circumcised every man's heart "one time" instead of the circumcision of the flesh of man's forskin.

Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; "neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh"
Rom 2:29
But "he is a Jew", which is one "inwardly"; and "circumcision is that of the heart", "in the spirit", and "not in the letter" (Mosaic Law); whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Gal 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, "Christ shall profit you nothing."

This warning is not just to adult males, but this is also to adults circumcising their children to be justified and obedient to the Law of Moses.
@Ivar,
Circumcision entered through Abraham first for a Covenant between God and man. It also transfered unto the Mosaic Covenant. Circumcision was a carnal commandment within that those covenants, but once Jesus came He crucified all carnal rituals on the cross. Once Jesus died, He circumcised every man's heart "one time" instead of the circumcision of the flesh of man's forskin.

Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; "neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh"
Rom 2:29
But "he is a Jew", which is one "inwardly"; and "circumcision is that of the heart", "in the spirit", and "not in the letter" (Mosaic Law); whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Gal 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, "Christ shall profit you nothing."

This warning is not just to adult males, but this is also to adults circumcising their children to be justified and obedient to the Law of Moses.

@regibassman57
Does that mean Romans 3:1-2 is irrelevant, and no longer applies, and is void?
also
Does Christ completing the work of not committing adultery means we are free from such works and free to do so?
also
could you perhaps be not contextualizing and taking Romans 3:1-2 as well as the entire Chapter of Romans Chapter 2 and Galatians Chapter 5 into account?
Lastly
Why does the final verse of Romans Chapter 3 say:
Rom 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
-----------------------------------------------------
Why does James say
Act 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Act 15:21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.

Why does the words of James seem to please all the Apostle and Disciples to include Peter and Paul?
Act 15:22 Then pleased it the apostles and elders, with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas; namely, Judas surnamed Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the brethren:
 
@Ivar,
Only God can reveal to you that circumcision has been done away with if you don't see it in the prior verses I just sent to you.

Yes, Romans 3:1,2 are irrelevant.

Believers are justified and accountable by what Jesus Christ teaches us we should do or not do and nothing more.

Joh 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he (The Father) hath sent.

If a man believes on Jesus, and is a doer of His word (seeing He is "God's word made flesh," they will be obedient and accepted.

Joh 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, comes unto me (Jesus).


Heb 5:9 And being made perfect, he (Jesus) became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
 
@Ivar,
Only God can reveal to you that circumcision has been done away with if you don't see it in the prior verses I just sent to you.

Yes, Romans 3:1,2 are irrelevant.

Believers are justified and accountable by what Jesus Christ teaches us we should do or not do and nothing more.

Joh 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he (The Father) hath sent.

If a man believes on Jesus, and is a doer of His word (seeing He is "God's word made flesh," they will be obedient and accepted.

Joh 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, comes unto me (Jesus).


Heb 5:9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

@regibassman57
:crying:
Thank you for clarification. No further questions.

However

Rom 11:18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
Rom 11:19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in.
Rom 11:20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Rom 11:21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

@bibleguy
I think this is a good example of Competing Love For Paul / Pauline Doctrine .
Competing Love For Paul / Pauline Doctrine.

Is kind of like when an individual runs to another parent because he does not like what one parent is saying or how they say it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Modern Church perceives this
The Modern Church has instead fallen in love with Paul, or, more correctly, the points in Paul's writings that soften the requirements of costly grace which Jesus taught.
By some of these writings I can only perceive some put up Paul to be The Christ instead of the Disciple of Christ.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
@Ivar,
Thank you for you eagerness to learn through asking questions :)
Satan tries to affect our hearts emotionally sometime in frustration, so some people give up. But as long as we know who it is that is making us feel a particular way emotionally and resist the devil as we've been told, we win. Emotions are the warfare of life (Eph. 6:12). Paul had to learn also who was tempting him emotionally, but he also figured it out and knew it was not him making his own self feel angry, sad, frustrated, lustful, etc.
 
@ Ivar,

We know there is no profit in circumcision because Jesus finished the work of circumcision. Israel was given the oracle of the Mosaic Law; this is what they were taught. This is also why they were struggling to understand the simplicity of the Gospel of Christ (2Cor. 11:13). This needed milk instead of meat as they were use to the Mosaic teachings.

I'm writing a post entitled, "Must believers keep the Torah"

Hi regibassman57! Make sure your post entitled "Must believers keep the Torah" accounts for the 66 objections I've raised against your viewpoint on this subject.

If you don't account for those 66 objections, then your post will be incomplete.

Looking forward to seeing it!

blessings...

PS I'll re-post, here, those 66 objections, just in case you misplaced them....

66 PROBLEMS WITH YOUR POSITION

1. You oppose obedience to Torah. But Jesus said such opposition puts you at risk of being called least in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19).
2. You are a religious person who opposes Torah. But Jesus said that religious people opposed to Torah will be cast away (Mt. 7:21-23).
3. You oppose obedience to Torah. And the consequences of Torah-lessness in Mt. 13:41-42 are too awful for me to even think about.
4. You oppose obedience to the Torah which came form God's mouth. But Jesus said we live by EVERY word from God's mouth (Mt. 4:4).
5. Jesus said that we should love (Mt. 22:37) according to Dt. 6:4-5, in which context, we learn that we should love in obedience to ALL Torah (Dt. 6:25).
6. You claim to be "dead" to all Torah, yet Jeremiah places that very Torah into the New Covenant (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).
7. You claim to be "dead" to Torah, yet Jesus applies Torah directly to YOU (Mt. 22:37,39 citing Dt. 6:4-5 and Lev. 19:18).
8. You claim to uphold the 10 Commandments, but obedience to the 1st commandment entails obedience to ALL the rest of Torah (yet you oppose that very Torah).
9. You routinely cite Pauline Scripture, yet you disregard the many Biblical considerations which confirm that Paul obeyed Torah and taught others to do the same.
10. The prophets (Jeremiah, Isaiah, Ezekiel, etc.) routinely uphold Torah-obedience, yet you oppose the prophets by opposing the Torah which they uphold.
11. The proverbs routinely uphold Torah-obedience, thus you stand in opposition to the Proverbs as well, even though Peter and Paul quote the Proverbs as Scripture which applies to us.
12. Paul said those who obey Torah will be justified (Rom. 2:13). You oppose Torah-obedience.
13. Paul upholds the legitimacy of Gentiles who obey Torah (Rom. 2:27). You oppose Gentile Torah-obedience.
14. Paul said we should obey God's commands (1 Cor. 7:19) which, of course, are contained in Torah (1 Ki. 2:3), yet you oppose many of God's commands.
15. Paul upholds the Psalms which uphold Torah, yet you oppose the Psalms and, thus, you oppose Paul's upholding of the Torah-obedient Psalms.
16. Paul says ALL Scripture (thus, including all TORAH) should rebuke and correct and train your behavior (2 Ti. 3:16), yet you oppose that very Torah which Paul applies to you.
17. Paul believes (thus obeys) all Torah (Ac. 24:14), but you oppose (and promote disobeying) that Torah.
18. Paul believes (thus obeys) everything in the Prophets, and the Prophets routinely uphold Torah-obedience. But you oppose that Torah-obedience which Paul modeled.
19. Paul opposed sin (Rom. 6:15); Torah-disobedience is sin (Rom. 3:20; 7:7); thus, Paul opposed Torah-disobedience; thus, Paul taught Torah-OBEDIENCE. But you oppose Paul here too.
20. Paul said we should live by faithfulness ("emunah" in Hab. 2:4, cited in Gal. 3:11), and the way of "emunah" is Torah-obedience (see "emunah" in Ps. 119:30,86,138). But you oppose Torah.
21. Paul condoned an animal-sacrifice-laden vow to prove he walked "orderly according to the law" (Ac. 21). You oppose such law-obedience.
22. Paul said that Torah-obedience from the heart IS THE WORD OF FAITH WHICH HE PREACHED (Dt. 30:14 cited at Rom. 10:8). But you oppose this Torah-obedient word Paul preached.
23. Paul affirms the New Covenant (1 Cor. 11:25) in which Torah is to be written upon our hearts (Jer. 31:33) so that we would obey it (Dt. 30:14 cited in Rom.10:8). But you oppose New-Covenant Torah which Paul affirmed.
24. Paul said we are in the flesh or in the spirit (Rom. 8:5). The flesh DISOBEYS Torah (Rom. 8:7). The Spirit, by contrast, leads us to OBEY Torah (confirmed, also, in Heb. 10:15-16 and Eze. 36:27). But you oppose the Spirit here.
25. John said we should obey God's commands (1 Jn. 5:3) which, of course, are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3). But you oppose obedience to such commands.
26. Stephen (full of the Spirit and wisdom, grace, power, wonders, and signs, Ac. 6) was falsely accused of being anti-Torah (Ac. 6:13). Thus, Stephen was truly pro-Torah. Yet you oppose this Spirit-authenticated New-Covenant-era testimony of the martyr Stephen.
27. Peter applied Lev. 11 to Christians (1 Pe. 1:16), but you evidently oppose this too.
28. Jesus stated that Torah-obedience is a sufficient condition of eternal life (Lk. 10:25-28), but you have chosen to disagree with Jesus.
29. Jesus sent forth TORAH-TEACHERS (Gr. "grammateus", Mt. 23:34) to properly represent his Torah-upholding Torah-teaching ministry. You, however, oppose Torah-teachers sent by Jesus.
30. Our DEBT (Gr. "cheirographon", Col. 2:14) is cancelled, not TORAH. Torah is not debt. "Torah" is "nomos" (in Greek), not "cheirographon". You have not proven that Torah is debt. Thus, you have not justified your interpretation of Col. 2:14.
31. Of COURSE Jesus fulfilled the Torah! But that's not an excuse to disobey it! "Fulfilled" does not entail "canceled" or "terminated" or "no longer in force". You haven't justified your interpretation of "fulfilled". You can fulfill your marriage covenant today, and does that fulfillment TERMINATE the marriage? Of course not! The marriage goes on!
32. Of COURSE a permanent once-for-all sacrifice (Heb. 10:10) is superior to animal sacrifices, but Torah STILL requires that they be offered (Heb. 10:8), and that same Torah passes directly into the NEW Covenant (Heb. 10:15-16).
33. Of COURSE the Old Covenant (which is obsolete, Heb. 8:13) is taken away and replaced with the second (NEW) Covenant (Heb. 10:9). But the SAME Torah passes into the New Covenant (Jer. 31:33; Heb. 8:10; 10:15-16).
34. You evidently oppose Torah-sanctioned Levitical/ceremonial/sacrificial activity, but some of the 1st-century believers were animal-sacrificing priests! (Ac. 6:7). Thus, you oppose 1st-century church practice.
35. You evidently oppose Torah-sanctioned Levitical/ceremonial/sacrificial activity, but THOUSANDS of 1st-century believers were zealous for Torah (Ac. 21), thus zealous for Torah sacrifices. Again, you oppose 1st-century church practice.
36. Jesus desired that the temple be a house of prayer for all nations (Mk. 11:17), citing Is. 56:7 which entails Torah-sanctioned animal sacrifices. Yet you evidently oppose those sacrifices which Jesus desires.
37. Dt. 30:1-8 is a FUTURE prophecy of 100% full Torah-obedience. Sadly, you oppose this prophecy too.
38. Ezekiel says the Spirit properly compels people to OBEY Torah (Eze. 36:27). Sadly, you oppose this function of the Spirit.
39. Ezekiel says a future temple will be replete with animal sacrifices (Eze. 40-47). Sadly, you evidently oppose this ceremonial/Levitical/sacrificial activity God guarantees for the future.
40. Isaiah says Levitical activity will be restored in the future (Is. 66). Sadly, you apparently oppose this prophecy too.
41. Jesus comes to RESTORE the covenant with Levi (Mal. 3). Sadly, you evidently oppose restoration of Levitical Torah service which Jesus comes to restore.
42. The Davidic Covenant absolutely assures the restoration of fully functioning Levitical activity (Jer. 33). Sadly, you evidently oppose this prophecy too.
43. The entire PLANET will (in the FUTURE) be required to send people to participate in the sacrifice-laden feast of Sukkot (Zec. 14). Evidently you oppose this prophecy too.
44. You wrongly assume that the character of Christ is expressed in the 10 commandments (but not the written Torah of Moses).
45. You have wrongly identified the nature of the fruit of the Spirit and its relationship to Torah. You have also evidently not addressed this problem with your position.
46. You claim "The second is not according to the first." Indeed! We Israelites widely DISOBEYED Torah in the Old Covenant (Heb. 8:9), but we will OBEY Torah from the heart (Heb. 8:10) in the New Covenant. Different covenants, same Torah! (Jer. 31:33)
47. Nothing in Ac. 15 states that believers should not grow in faithful obedience to Torah AFTER being saved through the grace of Jesus. The four rules are an entrance requirement (Ac. 15:20), not an exit exam! And, Paul (present in Ac. 15) taught and obeyed Torah (as I've shown), which you oppose, sadly.
48. Of COURSE you do well to obey Lev. 19:18 (Jas. 2:8). But James ALSO said that God's grace extends to those who are HUMBLE (Jas. 4:6); and humble people OBEY Torah (Nu. 12:3; Ps. 25:9; Zep. 2:3). But you oppose Torah.
49. Of COURSE we are justified by the blood of Christ (Rom. 5:9). But that same Christ (and His apostles) teach us to obey Torah....yet you oppose Torah.
50. You have not shown me a single good reason to suppose a single law of Torah has been "done away with". And, Mt. 5:19 plainly says that if you "do away" with even the smallest of Torah commands, then you may be LEAST in the forthcoming kingdom (Mt. 5:19). I don't understand why you would want to do that.
51. You say: "We as believers are dead to all the Mosaic Law (the Torah) "except" the Commandments of Love " But that's a contradiction! LOVE for God (Dt. 6:4-5) entails obedience to ALL Torah (Dt. 6:25); John agrees (1 Jn. 5:3).
52. Love for Jesus entails obedience to His commands (Jn. 14:15), and Jesus commanded obedience to His teachings (Mt. 28:19-20) which include TORAH-Teachings (Mt. 4:4; 5:19; 7:21-23; 22:37; 23:2-3,23,34; Lk. 10:25-28). But you oppose this Torah-obedient love which Jesus commands.
53. Of COURSE we are dead to the law of sin and death (Rom. 8:2) because we already died in Christ (Rom. 7:4) to that law (Gal. 2:19). But that's no excuse to ignore the Torah of righteousness (Dt. 6:25) and life (Dt. 30:19) which Paul applies to you (citing Dt. 30 at Rom. 10:8) and which is taught and commanded by that same Christ, as I've shown here.
54. Torah is holy (Rom. 7:12); we should be holy (1 Pe. 1:16). Thus we should obey Torah. But you oppose this Torah holiness.
55. Torah is righteous (Rom. 7:12); we should DO righteousness (1 Jn. 2:29; 3:7). Thus, we should do Torah. But you oppose this Torah righteousness.
56. Torah is good (Rom. 7:12); we should do good (Gal. 6:10); thus we should do good in obedience to Torah. But you oppose this Torah goodness.
57. Nothing in Rom. 7 states that all Christians should ignore all Torah except the "love" command. Such an interpretation fails to account for all pertinent Pauline data, as I've shown. And, the "love" command (e.g., Dt. 6:4-25) entails obedience to all Torah anyway! You must interpret ALL Pauline data consistently, not just a few passages (and then ignore others).
58. You wrote: "You are teaching righteousness comes by the law. Jesus is not teaching this." Then read Mt. 5:20 again! Our works of Torah-obedient righteousness must EXCEED that of the Pharisees so as to enter the forthcoming kingdom.
And again, Jesus APPLIES Dt. 6 to you (which states that Torah-obedience is righteousness which we DO). Sadly, you missed this context of Dt. 6.
59. Of COURSE righteousness does not come by FAITHLESS works of law (Gal. 2:16,21). But that's no excuse to neglect your duty to FAITHFULLY do works of Torah-obedience, as required in Scripture, even by Paul (Dt. 30:14 cited in Rom. 10:8).
60. Of COURSE we oppose adult-male-Gentile-convert circumcision (Gal. 5:2-3), because it's not even commanded by God (1 Cor. 7:19). But that's no excuse to ignore infant circumcision which Paul never opposed (Lev. 12:3).
61. Of COURSE those who seek to be justified by law (Gal. 5:4) without faith (Gal. 5:5) are wrong! But, that's no excuse to not walk in FAITHFUL obedience to the Torah of the New Covenant in which you participate, as required by Paul (Dt. 30:14 cited by Paul in Rom. 10:8).
62. You uphold the doctrine of Christ (2 Jn. 1:9), yet that SAME CONTEXT upholds obedience to God's commands (2 Jn. 1:6) which, of course, are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3) which you, tragically, oppose. Thus, you don't even interpret the broader context of that passage consistently.
63. You wrote: "The "doctrine of Christ" is not teaching believer are required to keep the whole Law of Moses." So Jesus was just joking in Mt. 5:19, applying the very SMALLEST of Torah commands to you? Of course Jesus was not joking! Why do you refuse to address this passage?
64. You do try to pick a few passages from Scripture to seek to support your position, but unless you address all my Biblical objections to your interpretations, and unless you address these other problems in your position (detailed here in this post), then you have NOT done a good job of setting forth a more comprehensive and consistent Biblical theological position, relative to mine.
65. You claim our discussion is "fruitless". However, bad fruit (Mt. 7) is likened unto lawlessness (Mt. 7:21-23). Good fruit (e.g., "pistis", Gal. 5:22-23) is from TORAH ("pistis" in Mt. 23:23, commanded by Jesus). So, I set before you the FRUITFUL benefits of growing in faithful obedience to Torah, as required by God, the Messiah, the Spirit, the Prophets, Psalms, Proverbs, Apostles, Epistles, Gospels, Hebrews, even in Revelation.
666. The antichrist desires Torah-lessness (2 Th. 2:3). You also seek to promote an anti-Torah viewpoint. Yikes! Please stop working for the wrong team!
 
@Ivar,
Circumcision entered through Abraham first for a Covenant between God and man. It also transfered unto the Mosaic Covenant. Circumcision was a carnal commandment within that those covenants, but once Jesus came He crucified all carnal rituals on the cross. Once Jesus died, He circumcised every man's heart "one time" instead of the circumcision of the flesh of man's forskin.

Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; "neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh"
Rom 2:29
But "he is a Jew", which is one "inwardly"; and "circumcision is that of the heart", "in the spirit", and "not in the letter" (Mosaic Law); whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Gal 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, "Christ shall profit you nothing."

This warning is not just to adult males, but this is also to adults circumcising their children to be justified and obedient to the Law of Moses.

So Ezekiel is WRONG to prophesy of a yet FUTURE time when PHYSICAL circumcision will again be operative? (Eze. 44:7-9)

Of course Ezekiel is not wrong!

Thus, regibassman57 must be wrong to suppose that physical circumcision is a "crucified" ritual "on the cross".

Just wanted to emphasize that regibassman57 has now opposed Eze. 44:7-9....

blessings....
 
@Ivar,
Circumcision entered through Abraham first for a Covenant between God and man. It also transfered unto the Mosaic Covenant. Circumcision was a carnal commandment within that those covenants, but once Jesus came He crucified all carnal rituals on the cross. Once Jesus died, He circumcised every man's heart "one time" instead of the circumcision of the flesh of man's forskin.

Rom 2:28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; "neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh"
Rom 2:29
But "he is a Jew", which is one "inwardly"; and "circumcision is that of the heart", "in the spirit", and "not in the letter" (Mosaic Law); whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Gal 5:2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, "Christ shall profit you nothing."

This warning is not just to adult males, but this is also to adults circumcising their children to be justified and obedient to the Law of Moses.

Nonsense....the context refers to circumcision of adult-male-Gentile converts.

NOTHING in this passages opposes infant-male-circumcision (as required in Lev. 12:3, and affirmed as valid by Jesus Himself, Jn. 7:22).

Careful! Mt. 5:19 plainly warns against opposition to even the SMALLEST of Torah commands....looks like regibassman57 is disregarding this warning and opposing Lev. 12:3 now.

Please stop!

Thanks....
 
@regibassman57
:crying:
Thank you for clarification. No further questions.

However

Rom 11:18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
Rom 11:19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in.
Rom 11:20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Rom 11:21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.

@bibleguy
I think this is a good example of Competing Love For Paul / Pauline Doctrine .
Competing Love For Paul / Pauline Doctrine.

Is kind of like when an individual runs to another parent because he does not like what one parent is saying or how they say it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Modern Church perceives this
The Modern Church has instead fallen in love with Paul, or, more correctly, the points in Paul's writings that soften the requirements of costly grace which Jesus taught.
By some of these writings I can only perceive some put up Paul to be The Christ instead of the Disciple of Christ.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Ivar,

I see what you mean.

But Paul and Torah and Jesus are not contradictory in any way.

They are ALL consistent.

See my posts here in this thread, today, which confirm this fact.

Thanks....
 
Hi Ivar,

I see what you mean.

But Paul and Torah and Jesus are not contradictory in any way.

They are ALL consistent.

See my posts here in this thread, today, which confirm this fact.

Thanks....

This is what Christ said to Peter

Mat 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Mat 16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
----------------------------------------------------

This is what Peter said about Paul's writings.

2Pe 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
2Pe 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
-----------------------------------------------------------

This is what Paul said about his own writings/words

1Co 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
1Co 3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
1Co 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
1Co 3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
1Co 3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
1Co 3:6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
1Co 3:7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
1Co 3:8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.

1Co 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1Co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1Co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
1Co 9:22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is what was said to the Jews thru Isaiah

Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what Paul himself said concerning Milk & Meat

Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.
Heb 5:14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which in my opinion is why James said "and everyone agreed"

Act 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Act 15:21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This is what Christ said to Peter

Mat 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Mat 16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
----------------------------------------------------

This is what Peter said about Paul's writings.

2Pe 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
2Pe 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
-----------------------------------------------------------

This is what Paul said about his own writings/words

1Co 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
1Co 3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
1Co 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
1Co 3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
1Co 3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
1Co 3:6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
1Co 3:7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
1Co 3:8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.

1Co 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.
1Co 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;
1Co 9:21 To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.
1Co 9:22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is what was said to the Jews thru Isaiah

Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what Paul himself said concerning Milk & Meat

Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.
Heb 5:14 But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Which in my opinion is why James said "and everyone agreed"

Act 15:19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:
Act 15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Act 15:21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for posting those Scriptures.
 
Which sin is everyone referring to?
The universal sin of Adam
Or
The breaking of the Law?
 
Back
Top